INDEPENDENT NEWS

Green Party proposes a carrot rather than stick

Published: Sun 16 Jul 2017 03:12 PM
Green Party proposes a carrot rather than stick approach to welfare
This is a media release made by Kay Brereton an independent beneficiary advocate.
Ms Brereton a beneficiary advocate says: “I applaud the Green Party for proposing welfare policy which appears designed to help rather than punish people who need assistance. Far too often people tell me they “just don’t like going in there” (W office).”
“At the moment Case managers don’t have incentives to offer people, rather they have obligations to impose, these seem to be designed to punish a person for not having a full time job.”
“People feel threatened and vulnerable seeking help from an agency which begins your interaction by explaining the three pages of obligations you must obey so that your benefit is not reduced or stopped.”
“The first thing the system imposes when a person asks for help, is a one or two week stand down from any assistance, and it is likely to be weeks longer before they get any payment.”
“I support them creating the incentive for people to move into part time work by changing the abatement rates. At present, if you look at it in simply financial terms it’s hardly worth someone on a benefit taking part time work. But a change in the abatement rates combined with a change to the bottom tax rate, is the incentive needed and will support people into part time and casual work.”
“As more employers are offering part time and casual jobs this response is a needed policy partner for the movement to a living wage for full time employees.”
“This seems to me to be a package which recognises the precarious labour market,and sets a policy framework which would empower MSD to react supportively and responsively as people fill ‘short term market needs’, while also ensuring sufficient money for household needs; keeping families healthy, housed and fed.
I see people at the moment quite literally starving, and hungry people can’t work they’re not ‘productive’.”
“The benefit needs to be at a level which will meet people’s basic needs, they will still move into employment when the have the chance because they have ‘wants’, but people without employment must be treated with dignity by the system, and this policy could enable that.”

Next in New Zealand politics

National’s health report card gets an ‘F’ for funding
By: PSA
Education Crisis Unaddressed
By: Education for All
PSA national secretaries vote for equal pay on Suffrage Day
By: PSA
Dairy farms using same amount of water as 60 million people
By: Ropere Consulting
Labour and Greens confirm commitment to restoring democracy
By: Greenpeace New Zealand
Another day – another health crisis
By: New Zealand Labour Party
GP letter more evidence of failure in mental health
By: New Zealand Labour Party
National’s health report card shows need for new plan
By: New Zealand Labour Party
Apologise now Jonathan
By: New Zealand Labour Party
Kiwis need a healthy health system
By: New Zealand Council of Trade Unions
Government’s record on health funding a fail for members
By: E Tu
RANZCP calls for focus on mental health in NZ election
By: Royal Australian and NZ College of Psychiatrists
Bereaved Mum gives National an F- on health
By: YesWeCareNZ
Dave Macpherson on Baby's Death at Waikato Hospital
By: Waikato District Health Board
Major parties’ views on exercise and fitness
By: Make Lemonade
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media