How to Solve the Housing Crisis – A Less than Honest Process

Published: Thu 15 Jun 2017 01:25 PM
How to Solve the Housing Crisis – A Less than Honest Process
Chris Barfoot QSM, a former director of Barfoot and Thompson, is today strongly speaking out against Government plans to pass a law that removes consultation and silences community objection to the sale of a large section of Point England Reserve for housing.
“I have always regarded the National Party as a party of integrity which has prided itself on doing the right thing and acting in an open and transparent manner” Mr Barfoot said today. “My experience of the Point England Development Enabling Bill has shaken my confidence in the Party.”
“It appears the zeal of Minister Smith has convinced Cabinet that building on reserves is the only way to solve the housing crisis and anyone who opposes this policy is adding to the crisis, including local people who protest at the loss of a significant part of their favourite park which provides both active and passive recreation.”
The Government anticipated this protest and ensured by clever timing that any public outcry would be ineffectual - Minister Smith announced the Bill the day before it was introduced to parliament, just before Christmas with submissions closing by the end of January this year.
“The Bill deliberately bypasses the usual statutory processes of the Reserves Act and Resource Management Act so that the Government does not need to take any notice of public objections, even though public submissions are almost unanimously opposed as is the Local Board. The main stakeholders apparently do not know best. The Government is determined to ‘improve’ the reserve by putting houses on it.”
‘This is not the only misrepresentation. It is claimed the houses will be affordable but market level is expected to be round the one million dollar mark per house and there is no provision in the Bill for any social or affordable houses. The Bill is supposed to be a Treaty settlement when there is no mention of the Treaty Settlement in the Bill, negotiations have been secret and it is by no means certain the iwi will secure the land.”
“Perhaps the greatest blindness on the part of the Government is the dereliction of its duty as kaitiaki of this unique waterfront land, supposedly held in trust for future generations, in what has become the most intensive urban development in New Zealand, the Tamaki Regeneration Zone.”
‘The future city of Tamaki has a projected population of 60,000 but will have no major passive recreation reserve, no place where one can get away from it all, no Cornwall Park. This will all be lost, for the sake of 300 houses!”
“The Government can choose to use its majority to override all objections. But it will have lost its integrity” stated Mr Barfoot.
Chris Barfoot has worked for many years with local Iwi on the Tahuna Torea and Wai-0-Taiki Nature Reserves.

Next in New Zealand politics

Regional fuel tax for Auckland a step closer
By: New Zealand Government
Waikato DHB investigation findings
By: State Services Commission
Explainer: Why you should care about Cambridge Analytica
Initiative to boost teacher supply extended
By: New Zealand Government
High Court Decision on Dotcom v AG on Obama request
By: New Zealand High Court
Practice Guidelines to support disabled people into work
By: New Zealand Government
Amendments proposed to forestry rights screening regime
By: New Zealand Government
Govt handing Akl Council the ‘tax and spend’ keys
By: New Zealand National Party
National urges Aucklanders to submit on fuel tax
By: New Zealand National Party
Regional fuel tax a nonsense
By: Road Transport Forum
Auckland fuel tax a step closer
By: Auckland Council
Nigel Murray saga: DHB board member believes more money owed
Stern warning to DHBs about spending but...
By: Association of Salaried Medical Specialists
Lessons for Waikato DHB out of report
By: New Zealand Government
Waikato DHB Responds to SSC Report
By: Waikato District Health Board
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media