Q+A: PR Disaster Will Slash Export Education Market
PR Disaster Will Slash Important Export Education Market for NZ: Immigration Agent.
The
changes made to foreign students coming to study in New
Zealand have been misinterpreted in India will mean a
“huge decrease” in the number of student visa
applications from that very significant market, says one
Indian immigration consultant.
Speaking to One News
political reporter Katie Bradford in India, Munish Sekhri
said an urgent PR effort was needed so the market wasn’t
completely lost.
“We’ll see a huge decrease in the
number of student visa applications because people see it in
totality, that, ‘If I’m not going to get a pathway to
residency, I’m sorry, I’m not going to study
there.’” “The changes are good, but [their]
interpretation has been very, very negative in India. And I
think the New Zealand Government should infuse some money
and energy to hire a PR agency in India and try to do some
kind of a damage control,” he told Q+A.
Mr Munish says
there should be mandatory licensing for on and offshore
advisers sending students to New Zealand. There are
currently around 2000 agents operating in the Indian market,
with only about 30 of those official licensed.
END
Q
+ A
Episode
34
MUNISH
SEKHRI
Interviewed by KATIE
BRADFORD
GREG An immigration
consultant in India says our government should ask the
Indian government to press charges against the agents who
sent students to New Zealand with fraudulent applications.
About 150 international students are facing deportation
after the fraud was discovered. Munish Sekhri, part of an
organisation that represents licenced agents in India, also
talked about the recent changes to our immigration policy.
He told Katie Bradford that it would have a big impact on
the number of Indians wanting to move here to study and
live.
MUNISH The
major motivation for Indian students to study in New Zealand
are migrants is to go and try and settle in New Zealand
through study or through work routes to improve their
quality of life, right? Now, for Indians the first
preference is always going to US or Canada or to Australia,
so we have to agree that New Zealand is the third or the
fourth choice for students or for migrants right now. It’s
a good thing that the changes are happening, but the problem
is there has been a lobby which is working against the
requirements or the expectations or the goals of Education
New Zealand and government of New Zealand as a whole. And
that lobby is of those unlicensed and unregulated agents in
India who used to say up to two years ago that New Zealand
is one of the easiest countries to settle in. You don’t
need English. You don’t need old funds. All you need is to
pack your bags and take a flight to New Zealand. And that
was before the rule 18 was introduced by NZQA, where English
language requirements became mandatory. Now the same agents
are interpreting this policy in a very bad light, and
they’re saying, ‘Please do not go to New Zealand any
more. New Zealand has shut down its doors.’ Now nobody is
countering this rhetoric in India or in New
Zealand.
KATIE And
how many registered agents versus unlicensed are
there?
MUNISH As
per the Immigration New Zealand information available on
their website and various newsletters that we receive from
INZ Mumbai, there are more than 2000 agents operating in the
Indian market, and there are only about 30 or 33 licensed
immigration advisors throughout India. So our organisation,
Lianz, had been lobbying, had been making representations
that we would like to see the mandatory licensing happening
for offshore advisors as well. We’re not looking to
monopolise the business. What we’re looking for is that
more and more people should be brought into the licensing
fold so that some accountability can be brought to this
industry. Now, I’m sure all of us have heard quite a lot
about the students being deported from New Zealand and
they’re protesting in front of the member of
Parliament’s offices and they’re doing whatever best
they can to stay back into the country. Now, many of the
students have also said that they are being victimised,
which might not be the case if you look into the case
details, but there is one fact behind this — that the
agents that put them in this wrong spot have gone scot-free.
Nothing has happened to those agents. So with the Prime
Minister’s visit to India, I hope there could be a mutual
diplomatic solution to this problem, where if somebody, some
agent in India’s found to be doing something wrong or been
exploiting or doing some fraud in this industry, I think,
through diplomatic channels, a complaint would be lodged
with the Indian authorities so that a message could be sent
out to the market. So I hope that the prime minister of both
the countries and the other diplomats could reach something
like this. In the past we have seen that there has been
action taken against agents on the complaints from
Australian and British High
Commissions.
KATIE How
much of the fraud we’ve seen is the students’ fault and
how much is the licensed operators? Do you know the number?
There must be some students, for instance, who know they
don’t have the money, who know they don’t have the
English
requirements?
MUNISH That’s
right. See, I would say that it goes both ways. Yes, there
would be a few cases where the students were really innocent
and they didn’t know what was going on in their
application. We see that on a daily basis. But we see even
more is where a student comes with his parents and wants or
expects the agent to provide everything, right from a
gap-filling education or work-experience document, to
provide funding. So it is wrong to suggest that the students
are purely innocent. The students entice the agents that,
‘We would pay you any money. Help
us.’
KATIE Do you
think the changes we’ve seen and the changes that may come
— what effect do you think that will have on numbers
coming to New
Zealand?
MUNISH What
we see is that the government ideally wants to attract good
talent, good education, good students with good English.
That’s fine. But before it gets better, it’s going to
get much more worse in short-term to medium-term, and with
that I mean about three to six months are going to be very
interesting. We’ll see a huge decrease in the number of
student visa applications because people see it in totality,
that, ‘If I’m not going to get a pathway to residency,
I’m sorry, I’m not going to study there.’ But then at
the same time, there are so many students who’d like to
study in New Zealand, but the Immigration New Zealand fund
requirements do not allow them. The changes are good, but
its interpretation has been very very negative in India. And
I think the New Zealand Government should infuse some money
and energy to hire a PR agency in India and try to do some
kind of a damage
control.