Comment on Education Minister's visit to Israel
Comment on Govt Press Release
regarding
Education Minister's
visit to Israel
Press Release | 02
October 2016: Palestine Human Rights Campaign Aotearoa/New
Zealandwww.palestine.org.nz
The New Zealand Government issued a Press Release on 1
October 2016 concerning what it called Education Minister
Hekia Parata's significant visit to Israel in
which she extended her education visit in order to
represent New Zealand at the state funeral for Shimon
Peres.According to the Press Release, Hekia Parata
commented: “It was a privilege to mark the passing of a
national and international leader whose long life was
committed to the service of his country, and to the
relentless pursuit of peace”. To say that Peres had
committed his life to peace is an assertion detached from
reality enough, but to embellish such a claim with the term
'relentless' is to venture further into fantasy. It is
difficult to believe that our Education Minister could be
unaware of a history so replete with
inhumanities.
Nuclear weapons and ethnic
cleansing
Shimon Peres introduced nuclear weapons to the Middle
East and the Zionist state remains the only-nuclear-armed
power in the region. It was Peres who fostered Israel’s
collusion with the UK and France to invade Egypt in 1956.
The Israeli historian Ilan Pappe wrote of
the:
“zeal Peres showed under Ben-Gurion’s
guidance and inspiration to Judaize the Galilee. Despite the
1948 ethnic cleansing, that part of Israel was still very
much Palestinian countryside and landscape. Peres was behind
the idea of confiscating Palestinian land for the purpose of
building exclusive Jewish towns such as Karmiel and Upper
Nazareth and basing the military in the region so as to
disrupt territorial contiguity between Palestinian villages
and towns. This ruination of the Palestinian countryside led
to the disappearance of the traditional Palestinian villages
and the transformation of the farmers into an underemployed
and deprived urban working class. This dismal reality is
still with us today.”
Bloody
barbarity
An eyewitness to one of Peres’s
contributions to peace, journalist Robert Fisk, remembered entering a UN camp in
Lebanon sheltering civilians that had been attacked during
an offensive ordered by Peres. Fisk reported:
“When
I reached the UN gates, blood was pouring through them in
torrents. I could smell it. It washed over our shoes and
stuck to them like glue. There were legs and arms, babies
without heads, old men’s heads without bodies. A man’s
body was hanging in two pieces in a burning tree. What was
left of him was on fire. On the steps of the barracks, a
girl sat holding a man with grey hair, her arm round his
shoulder, rocking the corpse back and forth in her arms. His
eyes were staring at her. She was keening and weeping and
crying, over and over: “My father, my father.” If she is
still alive – and there was to be another Qana massacre in
the years to come, this time from the Israeli air force –
I doubt if the word “peacemaker” will be crossing her
lips.”
“I saw the results: babies torn apart,
shrieking refugees, smouldering bodies. It was a place
called Qana and most of the 106 bodies – half of them
children – now lie beneath the UN camp where they were torn to pieces
by Israeli shells in 1996. I had been on a
UN aid convoy just outside the south Lebanese village. Those
shells swished right over our heads and into the refugees
packed below us.”
Peres tried to evade
responsibility, saying “we did not know that several
hundred people were concentrated in that camp. It came to us
as a bitter surprise.” But that was a lie, Fisk tells
us:
“The Israelis had occupied Qana for years after
their 1982 invasion, they had video film of the camp, they
were even flying a drone over the camp during the 1996
massacre – a fact they denied until a UN soldier gave me
his video of the drone, frames from which we published in
The Independent. The UN had repeatedly told Israel
that the camp was packed with
refugees.”
The man of peace
posture
There is more, much more concerning the
inhumanities perpetrated by Shimon Peres in pursuit of the
Zionist ambition in the Middle East. But thanks to the
mainstream news media and Western-aligned politicians the
world knows only of the record of Shimon Peres in
association with the Oslo Accords and the so-called peace
process. There are reasons why the Accords have achieved
nothing but the loss of even more Palestinian land and
liberty. The American Professor Emeritus of International
Law at Princeton University, Richard Falk, Special UN
Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the
Palestinian Territory Occupied since 1967,tells us
that:
“Peres never even wanted to reach a
sustainable peace agreement with the Palestinians, but he
fooled many people, including the committee in Oslo that
selects the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize. He was
unyielding in his refusal to grant Palestinians dispossessed
in 1948 any right of return. He early favoured, in fact
helped initiate, and never really confronted the settlement
movement as it encroached upon the West Bank and East
Jerusalem. He consistently pretended to be more
peace-oriented than he was.”
The 'peace process'
has provided nothing more than a cover for Israel’s
expansionist designs that rely on a total denial of equality
to Palestinians in their own land. In 1993, Richard Falk
heard Peres speak at Princeton, not long after the famous
handshake on the White House lawn between Rabin and Arafat.
Falk remembered that Peres had observed that the
'Palestinians’ were ‘Arabs’ and that it was for the 22
Arab countries to absorb the Palestinian refugees. Falk
noted a tone of racism in Peres's voice when said his plans
for normalising conditions in the Middle East would involve
a plan to benefit the region in which “Israel would
supply the brains, while the Arab would supply the brawn,
and the combination would be a productive regional body
politic.”