Productivity Commission investigation critical to tackling the big issues:
Media Release
9 December 2015
"The Productivity Commission’s Better Urban Planning issues paper zeroes in on some of the biggest issues that
contribute to rising housing costs, congestion, infrastructure deficiencies and poor environmental outcomes,” says
Stephen Selwood CEO of the New Zealand Council for Infrastructure Development.
"The Commission is seeking feedback on changes to the principal laws which guide urban planning and development – the
Resource Management Act, Local Government Act and Land Transport Management Act.
"District plans, council long term and annual plans, regional transport strategies and a range of other essential public
documents which determine rates and transport spending, as well as what your community looks and feels like all fall
under these three Acts.
"Currently decisions about land use planning and consenting for development, roads, water and other critical
infrastructure are made under the RMA. But decisions about public investment for these same activities are made under
the LTMA and the LGA.
"Different Acts mean different timeframes, processes and agencies. This creates opportunities for policy misalignment,
the most obvious of which is inadequate infrastructure to support growth.
"Achieving better environmental outcomes, reducing complexity and compliance costs and integrating growth management
will require substantive change from the status quo.
"It is therefore pleasing to see the Commission tackle hard questions around whether the environmental protection
components of the RMA need to be separated from the planning components and what role the biggest service provider in
the country – the Government – should play in planning.
"Yet even a flawless prescription from the Commission will not be enough to overhaul unstably high house prices,
declining environmental performance and an infrastructure investment bow-wave if the institutions making decisions at
the end of the day are under-resourced, poorly incentivised and incapable of delivering on the aspirations of their
communities and the country.
"A council can plan all it likes for growth to concentrate in one area, but if the roads and water services are not in
place to meet that growth, nothing is going to happen. Government can preach all day about the need for councils to
release land, but as long as councils shoulder the cost of new development while the Government hoards the upside, the
outcome is never going to be optimal.
"Ideally, institutions which make and enforce planning decisions should be the same as the institutions who bear the
cost of those decisions.
"A regional spatial planning approach to infrastructure and development which balances social, economic, cultural and
environmental outcomes and receives the buy-in of central government is the Holy Grail of integrated planning, but
unless the money’s there to back plans up, delivery will continue to undershoot aspiration," Selwood says.
ENDS