MEDIA RELEASE – For immediate use, 23 September 2015
Law Society identifies problems with “bright-line test”
The New Zealand Law Society is concerned that the proposed two-year “bright-line test” for sales of residential property
will unfairly catch ordinary taxpayers who need to sell property within two years of purchase because of changes in
their personal circumstances.
While the proposed Taxation (Bright-line Test for Residential Land) Bill is intended to target speculators who are not
meeting their income tax obligations, ordinary taxpayers are more likely to be impacted, provided they don’t fall within
an exception, New Zealand Law Society spokesperson Stephen Tomlinson said before today’s select committee hearing.
The exceptions include the sale of an owner’s main home, inherited property and the transfer of property under a
relationship property agreement.
“It is likely that the proposed bright-line test will subject the sale of land to tax where the taxpayer genuinely did
not have a purpose or intention of disposal at the time of acquisition. However it will not catch speculators who are
currently not meeting their income tax obligations, as they will simply change their behaviour so that land will not be
disposed of within the two-year period.”
Officials have justified the introduction of the bright-line test, saying the disposal test in section CB 6(1) of the
Income Tax Act 2007 can be difficult to enforce due to its subjectivity. However, the burden of proof in such matters
falls on the relevant taxpayer and not the Commissioner, the Law Society says.
“The proposed test should not be enacted as it is likely to be ineffective in achieving its stated objective. If
officials are concerned about difficulties in enforcing the existing land gain taxation provisions, then there should be
a comprehensive review of those provisions, rather than reform being made on a piece-meal basis.”
The bright-line test is also unnecessary because the new property disclosure rules to be introduced by the Land Transfer
Amendment Bill and the Tax Administration Amendment Bill (formerly the Taxation (Land Information and Offshore Persons
Information) Bill) will make enforcement of the existing land sale rules much easier than at present.
Given the potential effects of the proposed legislation, Stephen Tomlinson also took issue with the limited time frame
and lack of consultation. He said a call for submissions was made on 9 September, yet submissions were due on 17
September, with a proposed enactment date of 1 October 2015.
“We strongly recommend that the period for making submissions is extended so that proper consideration can be given to
reforms that could inadvertently affect so many.”
The select committee is due to report back to the House on 22 October.
A copy of the New Zealand Law Society submission is available at https://www.lawsociety.org.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/95144/Taxation-Bright-line-Test-for-Residential-Land-Bill-17-9-15.pdf