Lisa Owen interviews Northland GP Lance O'Sullivan
On The
Nation:
Lisa
Owen interviews Northland GP Lance
O'Sullivan
2014 New Zealander of the
Years say National’s benefit increases are “a step in
the right direction”, but calls on Government to do
more Backs Government’s move to require
beneficiaries to start working when their child turns three;
“that’s a good initiative” “If we could get
an opportunity to get these children out of those
[dysfunctional] environments, and these are 3-year-old-plus
or even earlier, perhaps, for six hours a day, five days a
week, I think we should”. Argues the Government
should be implementing “a comprehensive plan” to tackle
poverty working across all government departments Would like to see NZ Super trimmed to allow for greater
spending on health and education for
children
Lisa Owen: We’ve heard a lot
this week about what politicians and commentators think
about the Budget, but what about those on the front line in
the struggle against poverty? Well, Lance O’Sullivan is a
Kaitaia GP, public health champion and last year’s New
Zealander of the Year. He’s come into the studio today.
Good morning. Thanks for joining us.
Lance
O’Sullivan: Kia ora, Lisa.
You wanted to see a
greater focus on health and social needs of children. Does
this Budget deliver? Does it go far
enough?
Yeah, I think it’s been a bit of a
surprise. We certainly—the lead-up to the Budget
announcement in terms of media commentary was that there
wasn’t going to be a lot in that area. I think, yeah,
it’s certainly a step in the right direction. As a doctor
that works in a high-needs community with vulnerable
children, I think this will make a difference to my job on
Monday, at least when the initiatives start coming into
play.
In what way?
Well, look, you
know, certainly $25 a week extra in households in my
community can be a significant percentage income for their
disposable income, and so that’s useful. Though $25 a week
is probably not, you know, the end game, I think this is a
step in the right direction, but it’s not going to be the
magic bullet. I— I have an interesting feeling that the
encouraging parents back to work at age 3, I feel that’s a
good initiative. I like the initiative around increasing
access to early childhood education, especially for
vulnerable children. So, yeah, I think those are two or
three really good initiatives that have come out of this
Budget.
Well, Bill English says that kids who are
living in families on a benefit need to get a decent
upbringing. You said 25 bucks is a step in the right
direction, but can they get a decent upbringing for that?
Would you like to see it go higher?
Yeah, I
think the question is, you know, what is it? Is it just
putting more money into people’s pockets that are living
on welfare and in vulnerable situations, or is it having,
you know, a whole package of greater care and services
around these people?
So which is it, do you
think?
It’s probably a combination of both,
actually. I think, you know— I do think that there needs
to be some prescriptive measures around the increased income
that could be made available to families with vulnerable
children.
What do you mean by
that?
Well, I would really want to see that $25
being put to the best use, okay, so I would like to see that
being used for— you know, if it could be used to have
children be put into early childhood centres, that would be
fantastic. You know, things—
So ring-fencing
the increase? So if you want to see more money go to them,
ring-fencing it so you have to spend this money on food or
you have to spend it on early childcare?
Well, I
think, you know, that would be a possible consideration,
yeah.
Okay, well, the Children’s Commissioner
has said that this is a one-off increase; it’s not a plan.
Do you think we need something – a bigger picture, a plan,
a comprehensive plan with targets and a clear
strategy?
Yeah, well, I’m a simple GP working,
doing a simple job, although it seems pretty complex at
times, but I would say, yeah, again this is a step in the
right direction. I guess it requires, I believe, you know,
if we’re talking about child poverty, a comprehensive plan
that goes across sectors, obviously driven by our finance—
our Treasury department, but, you know, looking at more than
just increasing dollars in people’s hands but actually,
you know, greater connectedness between all of the sectors
that work with vulnerable communities, okay, so whether it
be MSD, the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education,
Justice, all of these players that actually can influence
positive outcomes for these communities, in particular
vulnerable children.
When you’re talking there
when you say about other people who can influence the lives
of vulnerable children, you talk about that it’s a good
thing that children as young as 3 will be in childcare. Why
do you say that? Why?
Oh, look, I’m absolutely
a believer. Well, look, the communities I serve, you know,
the children I’m serving and looking after are typically
coming from very chaotic backgrounds, okay, so if they’re
on welfare, they’re more likely to be exposed to social
dysfunction. Now, that could be alcohol-drug abuse, that
could be violence, that could be mental health problems,
that could be problems with incarceration of any number of
the families, housing problems, so, you know, if we could
get an opportunity to get these children out of those
environments, and these are 3-year-old-plus or even earlier,
perhaps, for six hours a day, five days a week, I think we
should. I think we should be able to expose them to positive
environments, keep them warm, safe and dry and give them a
learning opportunity that will prepare them for school,
because I don’t believe we should wait till age 5. I mean,
the chief scientific advisor, who used to be my dean at the
medical school, Peter Gluckman, believes in this. I
certainly tautuku his expertise in that area.
All
right. Well, the Government has talked a lot about targeted
help, so is it right that all kids under the age of 13 get
free doctor’s visits? Because that means a millionaire
could take her kids along to the doctor for free. Would that
money be better spent elsewhere?
Yeah, look, I
have for a long time felt we needed to be more targeted with
our, you know, what we have. We have a limited resource and
we have a scattered distribution in need, so the need at the
lowest end, the investment there is going to pay significant
more dividends than investment at the higher end. And, you
know, that requires some people viewing they’re giving up
something. My guess the aversion to targeted funding is that
the political popularity of that, you know, it’s great to
that all of our children in New Zealand are going to get
free access to care, despite the fact that probably only
about 25% really need that because of their
vulnerability.
We’re talking about people
giving something up there. We’ve just been having a
discussion about superannuation. Do you think it’s right
that someone can collect a super while still earning a full
wage? Would you like that money to go somewhere
else?
Yeah, well, look. Yeah, well, just looking
at the Budget overview today, the biggest spend in the
Government cost is social security and welfare – $25
billion in this budget. And then it’s 15 billion for
health and 13 billion for education. I’d really love to
see that flipped on its head and see education and health
being the top spenders in a budget. So how are we going to
cut down the welfare costs? Well, there is a really big
section of the country who are beneficiaries that we forget
to talk about, and that’s superannuates who have
contributed a marvellous—made a marvellous contribution to
New Zealand society and the nation building, and we can’t
forget that. How do we support them through into their
retirement? But the question is, where—at what end of the
age spectrum are we having the greatest challenges, and how
can we get the biggest dividend, I guess, for our
investment? And I would be saying there, looking at how we
rejig the superannuation as a smart move,
yeah.
Right, thank you so much for joining me
this morning, Lance O’Sullivan.
Transcript provided by Able. www.able.co.nz