INDEPENDENT NEWS

Open letter: Kim Dotcom challenges John Banks

Published: Wed 20 May 2015 09:22 PM
Open letter: Kim Dotcom challenges John Banks
John Banks
Your claims of lies and threats: it’s time to go on the record
I have seen your Court of Appeal decision and note that you have been discharged and the reasons for this. I too have been a victim of prosecutorial misconduct and am confident I will be vindicated.
However, I am concerned by your comments that I and others have lied and that I stated that if you would not assist my release from prison, I will destroy you.
While you may be celebrating the conclusion of this prosecution and seeking to place yourself in the best light possible, you know these comments are not true.
At your press conference yesterday you said:
“The witnesses told bare-faced lies, innuendo and half-truths in the knowledge that they came to court to destroy me.”
“The judgment speaks volumes about Kim Dotcom. He was the man that told me ‘If you don’t help me get out of jail, I’ll destroy you. I’ll fucking destroy you. He gave it his best shot and lost. He gave it his best shot and lost."
I have never lied about our meeting at the Mansion where you asked for a donation and I agreed. In fact in your Police interview, played in Court, you admitted a meeting took place, and admitted that you asked for a donation and that I said I would give you a donation. What you were not prepared to admit, at that time or since, was only that you had asked me to make two separate donations or the amounts. I made the donation in the way you requested, as you knew I would as a result of our discussion. The reasons I was prepared to do so were given in Court.
Irrespective of your claim about not asking me to do this, I am sure that most people will wonder how anyone would come to write two cheques without a request to do so, when one would be enough. Or how it could come about that the cheques I wrote out were identical in the amount to other “anonymous” donations you received. I do not think that anyone can credibly claim that this was a coincidence, not even you.
Your claim that I would “destroy you” if you didn’t assist me to get out of prison is also false. You know that I never threatened you. If I had made such a threat, which I did not, it could only have been through the Prison phone system. You know that all prisoner phone calls are recorded. No such statement has been made by me to you and you know this.
You know that if you continue to assert that I have lied, when I have not, and to make it appear as though you have been set up, when you haven’t, my only recourse would be defamation proceedings. This would take time and in the meantime you would claim that I am not to be believed. Some people may choose to blindly believe you. In the meantime I have to endure this continued conduct. I do not think this is fair given I have been drawn into this case.
I have a better idea and one that is more immediate. One that will allow the public you seek to deceive to make a judgment call right now about your credibility and mine.
If you want to persist in claiming that I have lied, then I am more than prepared to go on the record again to confirm what happened and why, as I have already in my Police statements and on oath in Court.
You should take the opportunity of doing the same, given that you chose not to at your trial.
You have repeatedly claimed that you have nothing to fear and nothing to hide. Well, you can now prove it. You refused to give evidence on oath in the District Court, or at your High Court trial, or during the Appeal. What I suggest is that an independent interviewer be provided with all the relevant evidence and then with an opportunity to interview both of us about what took place. This can be recorded or live. Other journalists could be present and take part.
If you do not want to take up this offer, despite what you are saying, then you may wish to retract your comments. I will then accept that and we can move on. If you decline the offer to go on the record, but persist in making such statements, the public will have all they need to know who is speaking the truth.
Kim Dotcom

Next in New Zealand politics

Jacinda Ardern’s remarks following summit
By: New Zealand Government
NZTA Board refreshed and refocused
By: New Zealand Government
Climate Change Adaptation and Risk Assessment Framework
By: New Zealand Government
Mana whenua reach decision on Ihumātao land
By: RNZ
PM to visit Japan and attend the UN General Assembly
By: New Zealand Government
PM's Post-Cab 16/9/19: A Way Forward
By: The Scoop Team
Gordon Campbell on allegations of left wing media bias
By: Gordon Campbell
Tighter gun laws for the safety of all
By: New Zealand Government
New Zealand-Japan relationship strengthened
By: New Zealand Government
eGates open to Japanese travellers
By: New Zealand Government
Twyford is the issue, not the board
By: New Zealand National Party
Too little too late for funding switch from rail to road
By: New Zealand National Party
First national voluntary emissions offset guidelines
By: New Zealand Government
NCCRA a start but local focus needed
By: LGNZ
Forest & Bird calls for urgent action on ocean acidity
By: Forest And Bird
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media