In a recent report titled 'Working for the Few: Political capture and economic inequality' Oxfam informs us that 'Almost half of the world's wealth is now owned by just one percent of the population'. Their report goes on to
recommend that the World Economic Forum, an elite gathering held annually in Davos, Switzerland, take economic and political measures to ensure a more
equitable distribution of wealth.
And in his explanation of why he attended the recent Forum in Davos, Kumi Naidoo, the Executive Director of Greenpeace
International tells us 'If we manage to shift the consciousness of one CEO or senior political leader, who may do the
same with a couple of his peers, then I think it is worth it. It is also worth being there, listening and observing,
understanding some of the forces that shape our world and importantly feeding that information back to the rest of Greenpeace and other civil society allies.'
As anyone who pays even the slightest realistic attention to the global elite already knows, the elite's efforts to
maximise its political and economic clout, and hence its wealth, at the expense of everyone else and the Earth itself,
are carefully crafted. And this is not going to change on our recommendation or because we talk to them, or even because
we listen to them. Moreover, the reason is simple.
The global elite is insane. And it is incredibly violent.
I would like to illustrate this insanity and violence briefly, explain what I mean by 'insane' and then outline a
strategy to resist it.
In a video statement in 2012, the world's richest woman, Gina Rinehart, called for Australian workers to be paid $A2 per day in a national economy where the current legal minimum wage is $A124 per day for a full-time adult worker. But Rinehart
is not alone in advocating or, indeed, implementing such policies. Slave 'wages' are a common occurrence all over the
world as most factory workers, particularly those employed by the world’s largest corporations in Africa, Asia and
Central/South America, can readily testify.
We also know that 50,000 people (85% of them children) die in Africa, Asia and Central/South America each and every day
essentially because they do not have enough to eat. This is a death rate that results in a cumulative death total that dwarfs both the death rate and the total number of
deaths in all war throughout human history.
Incredibly, even the number of deaths on 6 and 9 August 1945, when nuclear weapons were dropped on Hiroshima and
Nagasaki, resulted in less than 50,000 individual deaths for each of these two days (and each of those subsequent).
Apart from this, we know that about one billion people around the world go to bed in a semi-starved condition each
night. Moreover, we know that the global elite takes deliberate measures to maintain and exacerbate this cruel state of
affairs by planning and working to implement such atrociously unjust economic arrangements as those outlined in the
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA) on top of the already highly damaging
economic structures and relationships of capitalism.
How do you feel when you read these facts? If you are like me, you are horrified at the thought that you might starve
yourself, you empathise deeply with those who suffer this fate and you make some effort to ameliorate it or change it
(ranging from giving a donation, preferably to an organisation with more political savvy than Oxfam and Greenpeace, to
campaigning to resist implementation of the TPP and TAFTA). You do this because you feel empathy, sympathy and
compassion. You do this because you perceive the injustice and you want to take some action, at least, to change it. You
identify with your fellow human beings who are suffering.
Insanity is widely understood to refer to a state of mind that prevents normal perception, behaviour or social
interaction; it describes someone who is considered to be seriously mentally ill.
Do you believe that individual members of the global elite share your perception (which is shaped by your empathy,
sympathy and compassion)? Who is normal: you or them? Are individual members of the global elite behaving and
interacting as you would? Do they share your conception of what a desirable human community – with its basis in such
values as love, solidarity, equity, justice and sustainability – might look like?
It is clear to me that, as a result of the violence they each suffered as a child, we can readily conclude that each
individual within the global elite falls within the definition of 'insane': someone who is incapable of 'normal
perception, behaviour and social interaction', someone who is incapable of love, compassion, empathy and sympathy. And
this is why they do not join efforts to restructure the global economy to ensure distributive justice for all and
disburse their personal wealth to those most in need as a measure of their commitment to the creation of a humane world
based on equity, justice and sustainability.
So how did this insanity occur? In essence, these individuals suffered an extraordinary level of terror and violence
during childhood leaving them particularly badly emotionally damaged. Specifically, for example, two central psychological characteristics of these individuals are that they are terrified
and self-hating but, because they unconsciously suppress their awareness of this terror and self-hatred (because it is
too painful to feel), they project it as fear of and hatred for 'legitimised' victim groups, including working people
and 'poor' people in Africa, Asia and Central/South America. Because of the violence they suffered as children, these
individuals never developed a conscience, they never developed the capacity to love, and they never developed the
emotional responses of compassion, empathy and sympathy. And this is why they do not care.
It takes persistent violence inflicted throughout childhood to destroy an individual's innate capacity to develop love,
compassion, empathy and sympathy. Tragically, any member of the global elite, as well as any of their paid agents in the
professional class (the political lackeys who generate the delinquent legislative frameworks that facilitate the
exploitation of ordinary people, the business executives who undertake the daily management of this exploitation, the
academics who justify it, the judges and lawyers who defend it and repress its opponents, and the media personnel who
obscure the truth about it), has suffered this degree of violence, or very close to it, throughout their childhood.
And this is why these individuals are incapable of understanding that hoarded money and resources cannot provide them
with security, particularly in the world that is coming. They are incapable of understanding that true security is the
result of cooperative human relationships and a cooperative relationship between humans and the natural world.
Resisting Elite Violence Strategically
So how do we strategically resist the insanity and violence of the global elite? How do we replace elite-controlled
structures with ones that meet the needs of all human beings as well as the planet and other species? And how do we do
all of this within a timeframe in which the Earth’s ecological limits are not fundamentally breached?
To do all of these things, we need an integrated strategy that tackles the fundamental cause of violence while tackling
all of its symptoms simultaneously. This strategy has four primary elements.
First, and most importantly, we must review our child-raising practices to exclude all types of violence (including
those I have labelled 'invisible' and 'utterly invisible') so that we no longer create insane individuals and perpetrators of violence and 'Fearless Psychology and Fearful Psychology: Principles and Practice' let us create people of conscience, people of courage, people who care.
Second, we must non-cooperate, in a strategic manner, with elite-controlled structures and processes while
simultaneously creating alternative, local structures that allow us to self-reliantly meet our own needs in an
ecologically sustainable manner. Anita McKone and I have mapped out a fifteen-year strategy for doing this in 'The Flame Tree Project to Save Life on Earth'
Third, we must keep planning and implementing sophisticated campaigns of nonviolent resistance to prevent/halt wars, end
economic exploitation and save threatened ecosystems, as well as strategies of nonviolent defense to liberate
Palestinians, Tibetans and other oppressed populations in those circumstances in which elite violence must be directly
confronted (see Robert J. Burrowes 'The Strategy of Nonviolent Defense: A Gandhian Approach', Albany: State University
of New York Press, 1996 and Gene Sharp 'The Politics of Nonviolent Action', Boston: Porter Sargent, 1973).
And fourth, we must courageously pay the price of violent elite repression when we resist nonviolently, knowing that
many of us are going to be imprisoned (sometimes as 'psychiatric' patients), some of us will be tortured and a great
many of us will be killed.
In summary, if we are to effectively resist the elite's violence in our lives and take concrete steps to create our
nonviolent world community, then we must recognise that individual members of the global elite are insane and cannot
take responsibility for ending their violence. Instead, we must take responsibility for ending their violence while
creating a world in which damaged individuals are unlikely to be created and, if they are created, they cannot wreak
havoc on the rest of us.
If you would like to consider publicly committing yourself to helping to make this nonviolent world a reality, you can
read (and, if you wish, sign online) 'The People's Charter to Create a Nonviolent World'
Biodata:
Robert J. Burrowes has a lifetime commitment to understanding and ending human violence. He has done extensive research since 1966 in an effort to understand why human beings are violent and has been a
nonviolent activist since 1981. He is the author of 'Why Violence?'
ENDS