LWR director receives six year sentence
Media Release
25 November
2013
LWR director receives six year sentence
Two defendants were sentenced in the Christchurch District Court today on charges laid by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in relation to Canterbury clothing manufacturer, Lane Walker Rudkin Industries (LWR).
Kenneth James Anderson (66) was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. In October he pleaded guilty to three representative charges brought under the Crimes Act of dishonestly using a document (s228) and one further representative charge, also under Section 228 of the Crimes Act.
Mr Anderson’s charges related to the provision of false financial statements which were used to obtain and retain lending facilities, and the use of false documentation to obtain funds under a letter of credit facility, from Westpac New Zealand Limited. As a result of the fraud, losses of $70 million were suffered.
The second person, who, during a trial last month, also pleaded guilty to a charge for their part in the use of false documentation to obtain funds under a letter of credit facility, was fined $2000.
SFO Director, Julie Read, recognised the high level of public interest in this case.
“We feel for the staff who contributed to the once successful LWR brand and who were then victims of its collapse due to the activities of the defendants. The SFO hope this result will help deter similar crimes and maintain the integrity and credibility of New Zealand businesses,” she said.
ENDS
Note to editors
Background
to investigation
Lane Walker Rudkin Industries
Limited and associated entities were placed into
receivership on 28 April 2009.
After considering a
complaint received from the receivers, BDO Spicers, the
Director determined that an investigation into the affairs
of LWR Group may disclose serious or complex fraud.
Crimes Act Offences
Section
228 Dishonestly taking or using document
Every
one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7
years who, with intent to obtain any property, service,
pecuniary advantage, or valuable consideration,—
(a)
dishonestly and without claim of right, takes or obtains any
document; or
(b) dishonestly and without claim of right,
uses or attempts to use any document
About the
SFO
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) was
established in 1990 under the Serious Fraud Office Act in
response to the collapse of financial markets in New Zealand
at that time.
The SFO’s role is the detection, investigation and prosecution of serious or complex financial crime. The SFO’s focus is on investigating and prosecuting criminal cases that will have a real effect on:
• business and investor confidence in our financial
markets and economy
• public confidence in our justice
system and public service
• New Zealand’s
international business reputation.
•
The SFO
operates three investigative teams:
• Evaluation and
Intelligence;
• Financial Markets and Corporate Fraud;
and
• Fraud and Corruption.
•
The SFO operates
under two sets of investigative powers.
Part I of the SFO Act provides that it may act where the Director “has reason to suspect that an investigation into the affairs of any person may disclose serious or complex fraud.”
Part
II of the SFO Act provides the SFO with more extensive
powers where: “…the Director has reasonable grounds to
believe that an offence involving serious or complex fraud
may have been committed…”
The SFO’s Annual Report
2013 sets out its achievements for the past year, while the
Statement of Intent 2013-2016 sets out the SFO’s three
year strategic goals and performance standards. Both are
available online at: www.sfo.govt.nz
This message may contain information that is confidential and may be subject to obligations of secrecy in terms of Sections 36, 39 or 41 of the Serious Fraud Office Act 1990. A breach of these secrecy provisions is an offence. If you are not the intended recipient you must not peruse, use, copy or disclose the contents to any other person. Messages sent or received by members of the Serious Fraud Office are not private and may be subject to monitoring. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender. Thank you.