Internet Freedom Monitoring in New Zealand
Internet Freedom Monitoring in New Zealand
Summary
We conclude that of
the 29 Internet Freedom indicators in the La Rue Framework
New Zealand:
• 14/29 compliant including: basic legal
framework; no generic bans / restriction on political
content; high levels of access , no State sponsored cyber
attacks and strong privacy laws
• 4/29 non-compliant:
child sexual abuse images filter has no legal basis;
protection of journalists and bloggers is weak; access to
legal information needs improving; and the private sector is
not transparent on content removal;
• 11/29 unclear:
these include access issues for marginalised and vulnerable
groups and proposed laws on national security and
counter-terrorism (which were not developed at the time this
research was completed, but have since become law).
Where
we are doing well
• New Zealanders are generally free
to express themselves online
• There is no criminal
defamation
• New Zealand’s legal structure applies to
and supports freedom of expression on the Internet
•
Content blocking for solely political reasons does not occur
and policies for operation of .nz adhere to rule of law in
relation to takedown of online content.
• Government
actions generally adhere to the rule of law and due process
but there are significant exceptions which raise serious
concerns
• The local Internet community is active in
promoting human rights in Internet policy
• Internet
access rates are high, there is diverse content and
infrastructure development and improvements
Where we need
to do better:
• There is a high degree of soft
censorship and an apparent acceptance of this by many
internet users. This is a concern given lack of transparency
and few opportunities for input into filtering and content
blocking policies of Internet service providers.
•
Overall, Internet freedom related public policy is
fragmented and contradictory: for example, on the one hand
the law on Internet intermediary liability and the lawful
basis for filtering of child sexual abuse images are unclear
and have not been tested in the Courts. On the other hand
there is increasing specificity and control over regulation
for some online content and proposed new laws for online
communications will set a lower legal standard for removal
of online content than would be possible for offline
content.
• Privacy laws are strong, but there are
increasing concerns about privacy breaches by government
agencies and the need to protect whistleblowers.
• The
private sector is doing poorly in transparency reporting and
is not generally engaged in Internet freedom debates.
•
New Zealanders have access to some legal information for
free, but access is poor for those who cannot afford premium
fee-paying services and for access to secondary legal
information, including case
law.
ENDS