4 March 2013
Federation welcomes UN recommendations on racial discrimination
The New Zealand Federation of Multicultural Councils welcomes the recommendations made to the New Zealand Government
this week by the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.
The Committee considered New Zealand’s performance in race relations in Geneva on 22-23 February, and has now published
its conclusions. Minister of Justice and of Ethnic Affairs Hon. Judith Collins led the New Zealand delegation that met
with the Committee.
“The Committee’s 15 recommendations cover some of the most important race relations issues that we face as a society in
New Zealand”, says Federation President Tayo Agunlejika. “They range from Treaty issues, racial inequalities and
structural discrimination to languages, racism on the internet and asylum seekers.”
“We support all the recommendations but are particularly pleased that the Committee has taken up two issues raised by
the Federation: discrimination against migrants in employment and the proposed abolition of the designation of Race
Relations Commissioner in the Human Rights Commission. We particularly urge the Government to act on these
recommendations.”
Mr Agunlejika said that the Committee had expressed concern at the remarks by MP Richard Prosser, and recommended that
the Government “intensify its efforts to promote ethnic harmony through, inter alia, raising awareness in order to
combat existing stereotypes and prejudices against certain ethnic and religious groups.”
Other recommendations of particular relevance to the Federation’s members concerned support for the maintenance of
community languages, action to address racism on the internet, and non-detention of asylum seekers.
The full text of the Committee’s report is available here.
Federation submissions and Committee recommendations:
Discrimination against migrants
What the Federation submitted:
“There is considerable research that indicates that one of the major forms of discrimination that migrants and ethnic
minorities face in New Zealand is in relation to employment. This is also the experience of our members. Employment
discrimination takes a number of forms. One significant form is that many overseas professional qualifications are not
recognised by New Zealand professional bodies, meaning that migrants are employed (if they achieve employment) in work
below their level of qualification. Although we recognise the need for registered qualifications we believe that this is
used by some professional and registration bodies to protect their members from competition by migrants despite the need
for these skills. We submit that this represents discrimination in terms of the right to work under Article 5 € (i) of
the Convention”
What the UN Committee recommended:
16. The Committee is concerned at reports of persistent discrimination against migrants, particularly of Asian origin,
in the labour market, including reports of inadequate recognition of their educational qualifications, which leads to
their concentration in low-paying jobs (Articles 2 and 5).
The Committee recommends that the State party ensure the full and effective enforcement of the measures taken to protect
Asian migrants, including targeted measures to strengthen equal access to the labour market in order to alleviate the
concentration of qualified individuals in low paying jobs. The Committee further urges the State party to support a
system for the objective assessment of their educational qualifications.
Role of the Race Relations Commissioner
What the Federation submitted:
“The Federation is concerned that the Human Rights Amendment Bill currently before Parliament will abolish the
designation of Race Relations Commissioner and make the role subject to the direction of the Chief Human Rights
Commissioner. The Office of the Race Relations Commissioner was established in 1972 in order for New Zealand to comply
with the Convention, and was merged with the Human Rights Commission in 2002. Assurances were given by the government at
the time to ethnic communities that this merger would not affect the role or indepedence of the position of Race
Relations Commissioner, which replaced that of Race Relations Conciliator. The present amending legislation will, in our
view be a breach of that assurance and will reduce the visibility, accessibility and indpendence of the position. We
consider that this will compromise the government’s obligation under Article 6 of the Convention to provide effective
protection and remedies to persons experiencing racial discrimination.”
What the UN Committee recommended
6. While noting that the proposed Human Rights Amendment Bill is designed in part to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of the Human Rights Commission and to broaden its mandate to cover matters such as disability, the Committee
is concerned that this amendment may negatively affect the visibility, accessibility and independence of the Race
Relations Commissioner (Article 2).
The Committee recommends that the State party considers retaining the designation of the Office of the Race Relations
Commissioner in order to maintain its visibility and accessibility in the State party. The Committee also recommends
that the State party ensure that any change effected by this amendment guarantee the independence of the Office of the
Race Relations Commissioner to undertake its mandate effectively.
ENDS