Short-Sighted Budget Short-Changes Vulnerable Groups
Short-Sighted Budget Short-Changes Vulnerable Groups
- Caritas
Short-sighted policy changes
taking with one hand while giving with the other may leave
vulnerable groups short-changed in this year’s Budget,
says Catholic social justice agency Caritas Aotearoa New
Zealand.
Caritas Director Julianne Hickey says the
Catholic agency assesses the impact of Budget measures
through the lens of the common good: what will contribute to
and achieve the full human potential of each of us and of
all of us? ‘Catholic social teaching sees a person as more
than their cost or value on a balance sheet. A myopic view
of people simply as economic units cannot enhance our
wellbeing as a society.’
Mrs Hickey says it is
hard to see the full impact of Budget changes because, while
the detail of new spending has been given, the detail of
‘savings’ or cost-cutting is less transparent. However,
she says aspects of the Budget seem hard to understand or
even illogical, particularly where funding cut-backs are
occurring apparently in areas of priority to
government.
‘For example, it is shortsighted to
set goals that beneficiaries with young children will return
to the workforce and that participation in early childhood
education will increase, while simultaneously making formal
childcare less affordable by freezing childcare subsidies.
It is shortsighted to open an Advanced Technology Institute
to increase skills in science and technology, while
simultaneously eliminating student allowances for
post-graduate study.
‘Similarly, it is
shortsighted to set goals to increase educational
achievement at NCEA level, while reducing class-to-teacher
ratios. And it is shortsighted to partially sell state-owned
power companies to fund infrastructure development in rail
– which is only required because of past, failed
experiments in privatisation.’
Mrs Hickey says
Caritas is seeing a lack of integration and coordination
across the multiple changes taking place in social and
economic policy. ‘We have a deep concern that the combined
impacts will hit some groups harder than others, and will
have a negative impact on poor and vulnerable members of
society.’
Among the immediately obvious losers
in the Budget are: school children with after-school jobs;
elderly rest home residents with assets close to the
eligibility margins; tertiary students intending to take
further study; beneficiaries with disabilities; and working
parents with children in childcare.
The Budget has
also extended penny-pinching into overseas aid. A goal to
increase our aid spending to $600 million a year has been
continually deferred in recent Budgets, such that it is now
targeted to be reached in 2015-16. That would mean about
0.25 percent of our Gross National Income being spent on
overseas aid at that time, well below the international
commitment New Zealand has made to reach 0.7 percent.
Caritas is in the dark about overseas aid funding
allocated through non-government agencies. Previous funding
schemes for NGOs have been subsumed along with many other
areas into ‘International Development Assistance’.
Budget figures show little detail on how this will be
allocated among different programmes.
Caritas
acknowledges that external factors, including the ongoing
impacts of the 2008 economic crisis and the Christchurch
earthquakes, are restricting new government expenditure.
However, Mrs Hickey said questions need to be asked about
whether the 2010 tax cuts which benefited the wealthiest New
Zealanders are still affordable, if the government now needs
to claw back the tax rebates of working children and
international aid in order to fund its
programme.
‘We can only expect to see inequality
grow if Budget cost-cutting bites into the most vulnerable
groups in society and the world,’ Mrs Hickey
says.
Caritas Aotearoa New Zealand is a member of Caritas Internationalis, a confederation of 165 Catholic aid, development and social justice agencies active in over 200 countries and territories.
ENDS.