Q+A: Paul Holmes Interview with Annette King
Q+A: Paul Holmes Interview with Annette King
Points of Interest:
Former Police Minister reveals details of high-powered meeting held the night before Urewera raids.
Despite briefing, King was “surprised” at raids the next day: “I had no idea that that was going to be the way an operation was mounted.”
Expressing concern at police actions, says “most of the cabinet and the caucus were dismayed at the way people were upset in that community that had to do with anything that had been going on in that area”.
Solicitor-General David Collins advised ministers that the police were right to proceed under the Terrorism Suppression Act
Helen Clark and King both questioned Collins and were “assured by the Solicitor General that it [The Terrorism Suppression Act] was appropriate.”
It was “dismaying” to later have Collins say the Act couldn’t be used.
King says “…then to find that in fact that the law we were told was incoherent and they weren’t able to proceed, and in fact much of the evidence that had been gathered was not able to be used now was a big disappointment.”
“The regrettable thing is that so many people were frightened by the operation,” said King.
IPCA inquiry into operation Eight is finished and should be released.
Government wrong not to reform Terrorism Suppression Act: “we ought to re-look at that law.”
Q+A, 9-10am Sundays on TV ONE. Repeats of Q&A will screen on TVNZ7 at 9pm Sundays and 9am and 1pm on Mondays.
Interviewed by
PAUL HOLMES
PAUL
Let me now go to Annette King in Queenstown. Good morning,
Annette King.
ANNETTE KING – Former Police
Minister
Good morning, Paul.
PAUL
I’m pleased to see it doesn’t look like it’s raining
today.
MRS
KING Well, it almost
is, so be quick.
PAUL
Do you think the police will have learnt lessons from those
raids?
MRS
KING I would believe
they would, and I think what’ll help the police is the
independent police inquiry that’s been carried out by the
IPCA. And I understand it’s finished, it’s ready to be
released, and I think it ought to be released so that we can
see what methods they used, the operation itself, whether it
was appropriate or not, and I think the police would welcome
that, but so would so many New Zealanders.
PAUL
Well, that’s right. Might the police have learnt, for
example, that you can’t dress up in frightening ninja
outfits and jump on vans of kohanga reo kids – with
weapons – and scare the hell out of them?
MRS
KING Well, I think the
regrettable thing is that so many people were frightened by
the operation, and listening to the Police Commissioner’s
statement today, obviously they regret that as well, so from
this and from the report that we will soon see, I’m sure
that lessons would have been learnt.
PAUL
Can we go back to 2007? You were the police minister. When
did you first know an action was imminent, that an
investigation had been underway?
MRS
KING We were called to
a meeting – a meeting that was requested by the police
commissioner in the Prime Minister’s officer, actually.
The Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister, the Minister
of Justice, myself, the Solicitor General, the Commissioner
of Police, and I think the head of the prime minister’s
department to advise...
PAUL
So, just to get these names – it was Helen Clark, it was
in Helen’s office. Michael Cullen, Annette King...
MRS KING Helen’s
office, but Michael Cull... Mark Burton...
PAUL
As justice minister.
MRS
KING ...Howard Broad
and David Collins as the solicitor general. And there may
have been somebody else, Paul.
PAUL
OK.
MRS
KING We were called to
a meeting the night before the operation took place to
advise us that an operation was taking place – Operation
Eight was taking place. It was a heads-up that the operation
was taking place, and the reason why was because it was the
first operation, if you like, under the new suppression of
terrorism act.
PAUL
Alright, can I just stop you there? Were you told what the
investigation had been into? Were you told, for example...?
MRS KING
Yes, we were told there were serious issues that the police
had been investigating, and that these issues were serious
enough that they were going to be carrying out an operation
the next day. Can I just make one thing clear, though, Paul?
And it’s often been asked of me why didn’t I interfere
in the operation. The government of the day had absolutely
no involvement in the operation, nor did we have any say
over the operation, because when a police minister and a
government does start to tell the police who they
investigate and arrest, you have a police state. That
doesn’t happen in New Zealand . We were advised of it. We
were advised, also, that the actions that were being taken
by the police were the appropriate actions, and we asked
questions about that.
PAUL
Alright, just let me slow you down there just for a second.
So you had been told that any charges that would be made or
the investigation itself had been done under the Terrorism
Suppression Act, yes?
MRS
KING That’s right.
PAUL
You
understand also this was the first time this act was being
used, is that correct? You were reminded of this?
MRS KING That is
correct, yes That is correct.
PAUL
Did you ask then at that meeting...?
MRS
KING I understand,
Paul..
PAUL
Can I ask you, did you ask as police minister at that
meeting for advice on whether such action under that act was
appropriate?
MRS
KING Yes, not only did
I ask, but so did the Prime Minister and we were assured
that it was appropriate, that... And we were assured by the
Solicitor General that it was appropriate, and we did
question that.
PAUL
Alright, alright...
MRS
KING And so we took
the advice we were given.
PAUL
The Solicitor General was in the room. Did you actually turn
to him and say, “Is the action under this act
appropriate?”
MRS
KING In my memory of
it, the first person who turned to him and asked that was
the Prime Minister, Helen Clark.
PAUL
And the answer was?
MRS
KING Yes, it was
appropriate, and so we were assured the actions being taken
that day under that act were the appropriate actions, but
the truth is, Paul, we did not have knowledge of exactly
what information they had, what evidence they’d gathered.
We didn’t expect to have this. This was a police
operation...
PAUL
No, I understand this.
MRS
KING ...and we were
only being advised by courtesy.
PAUL
Now, Mrs King, you’ve made that clear. But later, of
course, after the great day happens – the Ninja Turtle Day
– later David Collins, about a month later, would say that
those rounded up under the Suppression of Terror Act could
not be charged under it, that the use of the act in this
case was wrong, that the act was coherent. Did that dismay
you that he should make this decision?
MRS
KING Yes, it did, at
the time, because we had relied on the advice that we were
given that everything that was being done was being done
correctly, and so then to find that in fact that the law we
were told was incoherent and they weren’t able to proceed,
and in fact much of the evidence that had been gathered was
not able to be used now...
PAUL
So let me just clear this up.
MRS
KING ...was a big
disappointment.
PAUL
Senior ministers that night, having been told by David
Collins that the use of the act was appropriate, suddenly
hear him say the act can’t be used. That must have been
very dismaying. And then there’s talk about...
MRS KING It was
dismaying.
PAUL
Yes. And then when you saw the pictures on the news that
night after the day of the action – the ninja day, for
want of a better word – what was your reaction when you
saw that stuff?
MRS
KING Well, I think,
like many New Zealanders, I was very surprised at the
actions, particularly around children, around older people.
I had no idea that that was going to be the way an operation
was mounted. It’s not something a police minister gets
involved in. And I think many of the cabinet – probably
most of the cabinet and the caucus were dismayed at the way
people were upset in that community that had to do with
anything that had been going on in that area.
PAUL
Yes. So you’re saying that as police minister, you had no
idea and the cabinet had no idea that the police, in
conducting this operation, were going to conduct themselves
as they did, frightening and traumatising so many innocent
people?
MRS
KING Of course not. I
mean, the police carry out many operations, Paul, and
sometimes it is with the Armed Offenders, sometimes it’s
with their Special Tactics group. They decide how they do
it. They decide what they wear and how they carry it out. It
is not a government or politician’s role to decide how
they carry out their operations, but our role in that is the
law under which they carry it out. And that is our role in
this...
PAUL
And changing our mind on the law...
MRS
KING ...and we found
out later that the law was not...
PAUL
Right. Changing our mind on the law was a problem because...
MRS KING
...was very disappointing.
PAUL
Yes, because we never get to answer the question what were
these people doing wandering around in the bush with Molotov
cocktails, weapons that kill people, calling themselves a
revolutionary army actually up to.
MRS
KING That is correct,
and we will probably never know that. And if we’re going
to keep this law, then it does need to be amended, but I
gather that the minister doesn’t wish to review it. I
gather that the Law Commission said it needed to be reviewed
and has started to look at it. So either we keep this law...
But let’s remember when it was brought in. It was brought
in after 9/11, when many countries were aligning their law
internationally against terrorism, and 12 years later, you
know, the world is a different place.
PAUL
That’s right.
MRS
KING And I think we
ought to re-look at that law.
PAUL
So have the police done damage to their reputation amongst
Maori? Yes or no?
MRS
KING I think from the
statement you had from Peter Marshall, they accept that it
has done damage, and they are keen to repair that damage.
And I hope they do, because the police do work very well
with different communities, particularly Maori communities
with their liaison officers. So I hope that they do repair
that relationship as fast as possible.
PAUL
You mentioned right at the top of the interview that the
Independent Police Complaints Authority – forgive me,
whatever they’re called these days – have done an
inquiry. Do you think there should be a broader inquiry into
the police tactics that day? If so, what level should that
inquiry be?
MRS
KING Well, in fact I
think the IPCA would have done a very thorough inquiry.
Judge Goddard is a very independent woman, and she’s
carried out many inquiries, and I would not question her
ability to carry out an independent inquiry. I think what
needs to happen, Paul, is we need to see it. It’s there, I
gather, finished. Let’s get it out there so that the
police can have lessons from this and the public can see
what went on in terms of the operation that day.
PAUL
Annette King, I thank you very much for making the time this
morning in Queenstown.
MRS
KING Thank you.
ENDS