Collins' Claim Drop in Crime Due to National's Policies Simplistic Nonsense

Police Minister Judith "Crusher" Collins claim that the drop in reported crime is due to National's "tough on law and order campaign" is simplistic nonsense says Labour's Wairarapa candidate Michael Bott.

What has been happening is that since around September 2010 there has been a change in charging policy directed to be followed by all Police Districts across New Zealand from Police National HQ. Also alongside this there has been a greater use of representative charges (i.e one charge representing a "batch" of similar offending). So the use of "alternative resolution" to charging for minor offences has accounted for a reduction in crime stats. The use of discretion is a good thing, but it should not be seen as a result of National's crime policy. Interestingly while reported crime may be down the prison population is up.

Under the pre-charge warning process offenders are still held to account for their actions through arrest, processing at a police station and police recording their warning for future reference.

When an arrest is made a senior officer will consider whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain a charge in court and whether it is in the public interest to take the charge through the court process.

When it is deemed not to be in the public interest to put the person through the court system they will be formally warned.

The process is available for minor offending only and more than 75 percent of offending will be victimless crime.

According to Police policy documents a pre-charge warning can only be considered when the following criteria are met:

•The offender must be 17 years or over.

•The offence must carry 6 months imprisonment or less.

•Victim considerations must be taken into account but the issuing of a formal warning is not contingent on the victim being agreeable.

•Reparation considerations must be taken into account but the issuing of a formal warning is not contingent on reparation being made.

•Criminal history or previous formal warnings must be taken into consideration but do not exclude a prisoner from receiving a second or subsequent formal warning.

•Family violence offending is excluded.

•Possession of methamphetamine offences are excluded.

So the reality is very different from the spin. Reported crime is down because fewer people are being charged because Police are quite properly doing something they have had the power to do for decades yet have often failed to do in the past - exercise their prosecutorial discretion. Also there has been a greater use of representative charges. This is a good thing, but it is patently dishonest to claim that a harsher sentencing regime is leading to the drop in the crime statistics.

ENDS

© Scoop Media