Doubling ETS tax acceptable to Minister but not to Kiwis
The New Zealand
Climate Science Coalition
16 September 2011
Doubling ETS tax acceptable to
Minister but not to Kiwis
“The Caygill Review’s
recommendation for doubling the current emissions trading
scheme (ETS) energy levy over the next three years my be
acceptable to the Minister for Climate Change, but It is
certainly not acceptable to the people of New Zealand”,
said Hon Barry Brill, chairman of the New Zealand Climate
Science Coalition.
“The Government’s constant
refrain has been that New Zealand will not try to be a world
leader and that kiwis will never be forced to do more than
their ‘fair share’ in reducing emissions” said Mr
Brill.
“What’s ‘fair’ about the ETS?
• No
other country has an ETS on petrol.
•
• No other
country has an ETS on the diesel used for key export
industries.
•
• No other country’s ETS covers
the transport sector - "a tax on
everything".
•
• No other country has considered
putting an ETS on food production and
farming.
•
• No other country has an ETS on
methane, ozone and nitrous oxide;
•
• No other
countrty has an ETS which increases the price of ALL
electricity;
•
• No other country has enacted an
ETS since 2004.
•
• No other country outside of
Europe has EVER enacted an ETS.
•
•
“New
Zealand was not only the first country in the world to enact
a national ETS, we are also the only country to have one
now, in 2011”, said Mr Brill. “We were world leaders all
right, but nobody followed.”
“The Government’s
excuse for the legislation in 2009 was our huge future
liability under the Kyoto Protocol. We now know that the
protocol will expire next year, and won’t be repeated. The
review found a ‘dominant view that international
uncertainty would prevail’ in the foreseeable
future.
“Hon Nick Smith says he is ‘calibrating
New Zealand’s approach relative to our key trading
partners’. Can this be true? USA, China, Japan, Canada and
South Korea, have all considered and rejected a national
ETS. That leaves Australia – where an electorate which
voted against carbon pricing might (or might not) have a
temporary tax imposed by a single vote.”
“Opinion
polls here and elsewhere have recorded a constant erosion of
support for climate policies. In most democracies, the
views of the majority are respected.”
“Carbon
trading is in disarray all over the globe. The Chicago
market is bankrupt, the European market is beset by endless
scandals, and sub-prime credits are flooding into the New
Zealand market”, said Mr Brill.
“At the same time,
the received wisdom paraded as ‘the science’ is
flummoxed by the fact that there has been no global warming
this century, and its frayed paradigm is under real
threat.”
“New Zealand is struggling to recover
from a long recession, while coping with the Christchurch
earthquakes. This is not the time for doubling energy
taxes” concluded Mr Brill.
Ends