Government Must Separate GE Foods In New Zealand Shops
Soil & Health Association of New Zealand
(Est.
1941)
Publishers of ORGANIC NZ
10 April 2011
Government Must Separate GE Foods In New Zealand Shop Shelves
New Zealand’s Minister of Consumer Affairs John Boscawen, and Minister for Food Safety Kate Wilkinson, need to follow the Cypriot Parliament’s lead and give New Zealand consumers the choice of whether to eat genetically engineered (GE) foods or not, especially as a new report casts doubt on GE food safety, according to the Soil & Health Association of NZ.
The Cypriot Parliament
has on Thursday passed a bill that will have genetically
engineered (GE) foods placed on separate shelves to non-GE
foods, and last month a French report showed weaknesses in
GE food safety evaluation, and pointed to possible kidney,
liver and reproductive health concerns.
(1,2)
“Democracy, despite pressure from the USA, has
led to the people of Cyprus getting the type of consumer
choice that New Zealanders should be able to expect,” said
Soil & Health – Organic NZ spokesperson Steffan
Browning.
“GE foods, of which New Zealand allows approxiamately70 different GE lines, spread through numerous processed products, must now be displayed on separate shelves in supermarkets and shops in Cyprus, with strong fines for non-compliance.”
“GE foods and those with GE ingrediants, will need prominent signage in three different languages. The Cypriots are serious.”
Originally mooted in 2005, Cyprus was subject to US embassy pressure saying that such a Bill would be “like a poke in the eye to the US” and likely to damage US-Cyprus relations. However the Bill was passed by unanimous vote, regardless of industry and US wishes.”(3)
Wikileaks has shown that the USA has been exerting pressure on numerous countries, including New Zealand to relax regulatory conditions and allow more GE foods and crops. The USA is the world’s leading developer and producer of GE products and has been part of a major public relations push in New Zealand to soften public resistance to GE.
“Soil & Health – Organic NZ reported last year that there were 64 plus GE food lines allowed by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) into the New Zealand food supply, consisting of GE corn, soya, alfalfa, potatoes, canola, cotton, sugar beet and rice, and numerous GE processing aids. This has increased to approximately seventy with several applications in process at any one time,” said Mr Browning. (4)
“FSANZ has yet to turn a GE food application down despite growing concern over GE food safety and flimsy food safety studies. Independent studies show very real risks but the same regulators that took decades to ban endosulfan continue to protect trade interests ahead of consumers.”
“The latest Seralini report uses available data to show that the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is not testing adequately for health risks from GE foods. Independent research has previously shown organ, hormone and reproductive changes in animal GE feeding studies.”
Soil & Health – Organic NZ has an Organic 2020 vision similar to the Cypriot people of a GE Free country with clear choice of what is consumed.
Notes
(1)
http://www.cyprus-mail.com/cyprus/separate-shelves-gm-foods-now-law/20110408
http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=13044:separate-shelves-for-gm-foods-now-law
(2)
http://www.enveurope.com/content/23/1/10/
(3)
http://documents.foodandwaterwatch.org/biotechWeb.pdf
(4)
http://www.organicnz.org/soil-and-health-press/ge-food-ingredients/
(5)
Seralini et al have conducted studies showing organ damage
in rats fed GE food. The latest report is using the material
including industry funded studies and shows the food safety
authority is not adequately testing GE foods. Extract from
latest French report (2): The 90-day-long tests are
insufficient to evaluate chronic toxicity, and the signs
highlighted in the kidneys and livers could be the onset of
chronic diseases. However, no minimal length for the tests
is yet obligatory for any of the GMOs cultivated on a large
scale, and this is socially unacceptable in terms of
consumer health protection. We are suggesting that the
studies should be improved and prolonged, as well as being
made compulsory, and that the sexual hormones should be
assessed too, and moreover, reproductive and
multigenerational studies ought to be conducted too.