Chinese Buy Up Of Dairy Farms
Get Used To It. This Is What A “Free” Trade Agreement Looks Like
The most unbelievably naÃ¯ve reaction to the news that a mysterious Chinese company is hoping to buy up to $1.5 billion
worth of dairy farms came from Federated Farmers, which said that this is an “unintended consequence” of the NZ/China
Free Trade Agreement. Pull the other one. There’s nothing unintended about this consequence, this is how “free” trade
agreements are supposed to work. They all come with embedded investment agreements which protect the rights of investors
from the countries which are party to the Agreement, and those foreign investors’ rights are backed up by the force of
legal sanction. For example, the NZ/China FTA includes a provision that NZ cannot make or amend laws (without China’s
permission) that “discriminate” against Chinese investors. So this is the outcome of what our brilliant politicians
(both Labour and National) have signed us up to.
And this is only chickenfeed compared to what will happen if we keep up this mad headlong rush into an FTA with the US
via the new Trans-Pacific Partnership (negotiations started this month). Dairying is the white gold of NZ agriculture at
present, and it would be thrown wide open to the predations of the massive agribusiness transnational corporations that
dominate US agriculture. And it gets worse – the politically very well connected US dairy lobby has already made it very
clear that it will fight, tooth and nail, Fonterra’s access to the US market. To quote Bernard Hickey (NZ Herald, 23/3/10, “Why bother with a US FTA?”): “Get the picture? These guys really want to use the Trans-Pacific Partnership
to shut out Fonterra from America…These FTAs are never about free trade from an American point of view. They are about
creating another opportunity to strong-arm smaller countries into granting trade concessions to large American
businesses”. CAFCA could not have said that better ourselves.
So, cow cockies, be very careful what you wish for, as you join the lemmings of politics and their media cheerleaders
charging towards the cliff of a US FTA (the “holy grail” to its proponents). You may well end up with the worst of both
worlds – locked out of the American market and finding your own dairy farms being bought up from under your feet and you
being reduced to the position of Third World peasant farmers, waving goodbye to your product at the farm gate, while
others make the money from it. Some holy grail.
As for the Chinese agribusiness buyup of dairy farms, the description of it by its own mouthpieces paints a perfect
example of vertical integration, whereby the Chinese owners control every stage of the process from NZ paddock to the
sales of the finished product in China. They clip the ticket at every stage of the hermetically sealed process, with
minimum benefit to NZ. It’s simply a new, Chinese, version of the British economic colonisation that dominated this
country’s agriculture up until the 1970s. So, instead of being a “farm for Britain”, NZ will be a milk cow for China.
Apologists for foreign land ownership always say “they can’t take the land away”. Why would they want to? It is much
more profitable for them to leave it right here, and milk it (pun intended) for all it’s worth.
The media has already highlighted a number of aspects of this proposed massive buyup that look distinctly Mickey Mouse.
The Chinese company was actually a mining company which has changed its name to Natural Dairy (NZ) Holdings Ltd. That
sounds much more nice and “green”, doesn’t it? The company is registered in the Cayman Islands tax haven; it lists a
street address in Hong Kong but has no phone number; and one of those involved in the deal is the subject of her own
article in today’s Herald, again by Bernard Hickey, entitled “Should May Wang be allowed to buy NZ’s dairy farms?”. The fact that the only
confirmed part of the deal is that Natural Dairy is buying Alan Crafar’s fallen empire of dairy farms shows the dangers
of monoculture in farming, of putting all one’s eggs into one basket, of the gold rush mentality (it used to be
forestry, kiwifruit, goats, ostriches, Chathams Islands crayfish) and of a complete lack of any overall planning when it
comes to the most vital productive sector of our farming industry. Crafar is the perfect illustration of an era just
past when every man and his dog got into dairying – in his case, the dog might have done a better job.
This is definitely not “foreign investment” – it’s a mortgagee sale. And don’t expect our “oversight” authorities to do
anything about it. Natural Dairy has already bought four farms and “neglected” to get approval from the Overseas
Investment Office. No worries to our heroic rubberstampers – it “rebuked” them (what exactly does that mean?) and gave
them retrospective consent, a standard procedure for the OIO. Expect more of this stuff as the realities of an “open
economy committed to foreign investment and free trade” become more glaringly obvious by the day.
Never mind Gerry Brownlee throwing the conservation estate open to foreign miners, the Chinese are already here to mine
milk. And the Americans won’t be far behind if the Government (either National or Labour) persists in this childlike
fixation with “free” trade.