Food Safety Minister Needs To Question GE Food Safety and Labelling.
Food Safety Minister Kate Wilkinson needs to ensure a comprehensive review of the labelling of genetically engineered
(GE) food ingredients and GE food safety in New Zealand, now that 40 different GE food applications have been approved
for use in New Zealand, including foods derived from 61 GE plant lines (1), according to the Soil & Health Association of New Zealand. Soil & Health says the latest approvals (2) have gone through despite an increase in evidence of the health risks from GE
food.
GE plant lines approved include canola, corn, potato, cotton, soy bean, lucerne (alfalfa), sugarbeet, and rice. Further
GE corn, cotton and soybean applications are being processed. Fourteen approved microbial-based food processing aids
have also been approved with another being considered.
The Food Safety Minister’s meeting in Adelaide last Friday with the Australia New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial
Council (Ministerial Council) (3) ended with a joint communiqué (4) that included, “agreeing in principle to commission
an independent, comprehensive review of food labelling law and policy.” However Soil & Health is concerned that the “independence” is unlikely to be more than a sham, and points to repeated GE food safety
concerns by expert independent scientific researchers being consistently overridden.”
“Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ), which takes direction from the Ministerial Council, has never yet
turned down an application for the introduction of a genetically engineered food line, and its past so-called
independent advice has invariably used research supplied by the mega food industry applicants,” said Soil & Health spokesperson Steffan Browning.
“The ‘independent panel’ to undertake the Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy will be appointed by the Ministerial
Council, and if it is anything like last year’s New Zealand Food Safety Authority’s (NZFSA) so-called independent review
of some of its decisions, it will be a rubber stamp for whatever convenient business focused direction the Ministerial
Council wants.”
“The NZFSA review including A1-A2 milk, artificial sweetener aspartame and Campylobacter, lacked the independence
required. In a fox-in-charge-of-the-henhouse scenario, the NZFSA, which was being criticised for its decisions, decided
on a review, drafted the terms of reference, and then chose its own reviewer. There were no surprises in the review’s
findings.”
“This exercise, as in the NZFSA review, is unlikely to be anything more than a whitewash of FSANZ practices and a Trojan
horse for even more harmonisation with international food standards regulator Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex). New
Zealanders will lose even more sovereignty and control of their food supply and its safety.”
“However Soil & Health and New Zealand consumers will be blissed out if Kate Wilkinson gets in now and reviews just how many of the
numerous GE food ingredients are not identified on the supermarket shelves. While she is putting that right, she should
also get Mandatory Country of Origin Labelling (MCoOL) underway,” said Mr Browning. “The Minister doesn’t need the
Aussies for either of those, the Aussies have MCoOL already, and any of the Minister’s staff can show what a joke GE
food labelling (5) is in NZ. When did NZFSA last check on compliance of the weak rules?”
“NZFSA’s own broad based Consumer Forum voted unanimously for MCoOL, yet NZFSA continues to advise government against
it, and like FSANZ advises that GE foods are safe.”
“The Indian government has just overridden its GE crop regulator and put on hold the permission for GE aubergine there,
because of protest and scientific criticism. One such scientist who assessed the GE food’s applicant Monsanto-Mahyco's
molecular transformation methods, New Zealand’s Professor Jack Heinemann from the University of Canterbury, was quoted
saying, “I have never seen less professionalism in the presentation and quality assurance of molecular data than in this
study,"
Heinemann, who is genuinely independent, has also questioned FSANZ decisions affecting New Zealanders exposure to GE
foods but again the applicant’s own substandard science was preferred by FSANZ. (6)
“Independent animal GE food feeding studies including foods approved for New Zealand are increasingly showing food
safety risks, yet FSANZ has yet to turn down an application. Studies include showing multi generational infant
mortalities and disorders of the reproductive, immune and blood clotting systems. This can include increased cases of
pre-cancerous growths. (7,8,9)
“While buying organic food avoids exposure to GE food components, Soil & Health points out the broad consumer preference to not be eating GE foods, yet current GE labelling requirements are
both weak and under-enforced,” said Mr Browning.
“Soil & Health maxim, Healthy Soil, Healthy Food, Healthy People, is a lead to a sustainable environment, safe and nutritious
food, and a healthy nation. Consumers should at least have the choice and the Minister can ensure they do.”
ENDS