NZ bullying Over Pacific Free Trade Deal - Report
Media Release, for immediate release
Pacific Network on
Globalisation
Pacific Churches, and Pacific trade
watchdog, release report on Australian and NZ bullying to
launch Pacific free trade deal
SUVA, Thursday July
30.
Today the General Secretary of the Pacific
Conference of Churches has released a report documenting the
use of ‘power politics’ by the Australian and New
Zealand governments to push Pacific island countries to
launch free trade negotiations at the Pacific Islands Forum
Leaders’ meeting in Cairns next week.
Trade
officials from Australia and New Zealand have held informal
discussions with their counterparts from the Pacific islands
over the past 14 months, with a view to extending the
Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations to a new free
trade deal (PACER-Plus). General Secretary for the Pacific
Conference of Churches, Fei Tevi, today said that while
these discussions were being held, the island countries had
faced concerted pressure from Australia and New Zealand to
launch free trade negotiations well before they were
ready.
He said the trading relationship between the
Pacific island countries and Australia and New Zealand
“should be based on justice, and should enhance social
development in the Pacific”.
“Unfortunately
Australia and New Zealand have taken advantage of the fact
that there is no clear rulebook for trade negotiations, and
have pushed the region to launch free trade negotiations on
terms that reflect their own political and economic
priorities,” said Mr Tevi. “This report puts them on
notice that we are watching closely, and that any
‘backroom pressure’ of the Island countries will be
resisted.”
The report (entitled Speaking Truth to
Power – Australian and New Zealand use of power politics
to launch Pacific free trade negotiations) was produced by
the Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG).
PANG
coordinator Maureen Penjueli said the report exposed the
often secret world of regional trade discussions - where
meetings between Pacific government officials and their
Australian and New Zealand counterparts are held 'behind
closed doors'.
She said the Australian and New
Zealand officials had used this 'secret environment' to push
Pacific countries to launch PACER-Plus four years ahead of
schedule, and before the Pacific governments have
established an Office they hope will guide the Islands
through complex negotiations with their largest trading
partners.
Ms Penjueli said one way the island
countries might “redress the compromises they have been
bullied into during the PACER-Plus process so far” would
be to support Fiji ’s call for a moratorium on any
decisions under PACER until consultations over its unlawful
exclusion from the trade talks have produced a satisfactory
outcome.
“Pacific island countries should use
this opportunity to renegotiate the terms of the regional
Office of the Chief Trade Advisor and the timeline for
negotiations (contained in the Joint PACER-Plus Roadmap) to
seek better outcomes for the Pacific,” said Ms Penjueli.
“It may be a high-risk strategy, but then so too is a free
trade agreement negotiated on terms dictated by Australia
and New Zealand .”
This week a Diplomatic Note
from the Solomon Islands Trade Minister, William Haomae, was
circulated by the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat to all
governments party to the original PACER agreement. That
note indicated that the Solomon Islands government supports
Fiji ’s call for consultations to be held among all PACER
parties to discuss Fiji ’s exclusion from PACER related
discussions. The Diplomatic Note further indicated that
the “Solomon Islands would like to register its support
for Fiji’s suggestion that the spirit of approaching such
consultations in good faith requires that there be no
discussion of PACER matters by Parties until …
consultations can be brought to a mutually satisfactory
conclusion”.
Ms Penjueli said the note from Trade
Minister Hoamae meant Pacific Leaders should refrain from
launching PACER-Plus negotiations in Cairns . “Now is
the time to step back and consider the issues relating to
possible free trade negotiations with Australia and New
Zealand in the absence of arbitrary timelines,” said Ms
Penjueli. “The need to launch negotiations in August is
only an Australian political consideration – it has
nothing to do with development in the
Pacific.”
Speaking Truth to Power documents
veiled and overt threats by the Australian and New Zealand
governments – directed at Pacific trade officials (and
even Ministers) to secure a launch of PACER-Plus
negotiations when Australia hosts the Pacific Islands Forum
Leaders' Meeting in Cairns next week. The report also
highlights attempts by Australia and New Zealand to control
studies relating to PACER-Plus, and the training of Pacific
officials who will take part in PACER-Plus
negotiations.
The report draws widely on public
announcements, media reports, internal briefing notes,
confidential reports and interviews with trade officials
from across the Pacific (many of whom have asked to remain
anonymous out of fear of reprisal).
PACER-Plus will
have considerable commercial benefit for Australia and New
Zealand . Any gains to the Pacific are likely to be much
smaller, and PACER-Plus entails considerable risks for
Pacific countries – including government revenue losses,
business closures, job losses and a reduction in policy
space.
An e-copy of the report; Speaking Truth to
Power: Australian and New Zealand use of power politics to
launch Pacific free trade negotiations is available
here
Australian and New Zealand use of power politics to launch Pacific free trade negotiations (pdf)
ENDS