Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

ERMA Shown As Failing Parliaments Intentions


ERMA Shown As Failing Parliaments Intentions.

The High Court has ruled against ERMA’s decision to allow genetically engineered (GE) animals, after an appeal by GE Free New Zealand. The appeal success against these bizarre and open-ended applications for GE animals by Crown Research Institute AgResearch supports the feelings of most New Zealanders, according to the Soil & Health Association of New Zealand.

The June 5 High Court judgement ordered that “ERMA’s decision to accept the Applications as applications under s 40 of HSNO is set aside and ERMA is to take no further steps towards hearing and assessing the Applications.”

Polling commissioned by Soil & Health and the animal advocacy organisation SAFE last year (1) confirmed that most New Zealanders oppose GE in animals. More than 1700 people submitted against the applications of AgResearch that potentially allowed 18 types of animal to be genetically modified with animal cell lines (including human and monkey) and E.coli and yeast, at Ruakura and other unidentified facilities. The animals included cows, goats, sheep, pigs, deer, llama, horses, rats, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, chickens and the cell-lines from humans and monkeys.

“The AgResearch applications did not specify which GE constructs would be used, or on what animals, or where in New Zealand the GE laboratory experiments, or field trials, would take place, therefore making risk analysis by the public very difficult, and the High Court has agreed,” said Soil & Health spokesperson Steffan Browning.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

“Our poll showed twice as many New Zealanders oppose GE in animals than support it, and like GE Free NZ, Soil & Health and hundreds of submitters to the AgResearch applications, the High Court has agreed that “the applications are simply too generic to enable the risk assessment called for by the Hazardous Substance’s and New Organism’s Act (HSNO) to be meaningfully undertaken.”

Judge Clifford had also stated, “that the information necessary for effective public input here has not been made available,” and … “To enable effective public participation, sufficient particularity is required at the application stage.”
                 
“Every ERMA approved field trial, whether plant or animal, has fallen down on its conditions. For AgResearch to be loosely applying for a veritable zoo to play with, was risky, unethical and went against New Zealand’s point of difference in the world: clean green, 100% Pure and essentially GE Free,” said Mr Browning.

“AgResearch’s applications continued the arrogance displayed by other CRIs. Scion disregarded consent conditions originally imposed by ERMA with its GE pine tree field trial, and Plant & Food Research allowed GE brassicas to illegally flower at its Lincoln site. ERMA effectively ignored hundreds of submitters opposed to those trials and the submitters concerns were later realised with the CRIs flouting community concern and the few conditions imposed by ERMA.”

“We are very pleased that ERMA’s complicity with poor compliance of the HSNO Act has been showed up again by this High Court judgement. The high level of complicity with Scion last year by ERMA and MAF Biosecurity New Zealand, and slow action against Plant & Food Research following its December 2008 breaches, shows that the regulatory bodies in New Zealand appear to be manipulated by the pro GE science lobbyists.”

“The High Court decision noted the use of a Mr Slattery as a consultant providing advice to AgResearch on the applications and that previously he had been employed by ERMA as Applications Manager, and that his evidence did not differ greatly from that of the current Application manager. Soil & Health suspects an element of revolving door with Mr Slattery having appeared in another forum as an independent consultant and not declaring his genuine interest.”

The High Court also quoted Environment Minister Nick Smith from a 1996 select committee (2) discussing ERMA’s role, “Neither this Parliament nor the community should want an airy-fairy authority that will make decisions on the whim of the politics of the day. We want an authority

that will base its decisions on rigour and science.”

Minister of the day, Simon Upton was quoted from the same select committee notes, “So the likelihood of the authority making a mistake in terms of the facts of a particular approval is very remote. It is more likely that any mistake will be the result of inadequate or inaccurate information being provided by the application.”

“Soil & Health hopes that the current Environment Minister will ensure that New Zealand follows a clean green Brand New Zealand vision that has no GE in the environment, and that regulatory authorities are robust, making decisions on rigour and science, that are also precautionary and don’t allow high risk activities. AgResearch, Scion and Plant & Food Research seem hell-bent on continuing down a GE path, yet have demonstrably shown a lack of responsibility or capacity to manage,” said Mr Browning.

“Science is showing repeatedly that GE is not safe and the economic risk has not been taken into account correctly by ERMA. As shown by Scion and Plant & Food, Mr Upton’s vision has failed and the likelihood of the Authority making mistakes is no longer ‘remote’ but standard.”

There are no legally operating GE field tests in New Zealand currently with Plant & Food’s previously approved GE alliums on hold while the investigation of the failed GE brassica trial continues, and AgResearch’s GE cattle are unable to be experimented on as the trial consent has expired and now their next applications have been shown to be seriously wanting.

ERMA has indicated to Soil & Health that the penalty for Plant & Food’s serious breach is unlikely to be as severe as we would hope for.

“The consistent mess from the GE community and risks to our clean green image should ensure that Plant & Food do not proceed with any GE field trials. Euthanasia of AgResearch’s current GE herd and elimination of all GE field tests will be better for New Zealand’s environmental and economic future,” says Mr Browning.

 
ends
 
                 

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.