Briefing to Incoming Ministers
Import News from the Importers Institute:
Briefing to
Incoming Ministers
The Importers Institute provides a
briefing to new Ministers Maurice
Williamson (Customs)
and David Carter (Bisosecurity).
The good news is that you
have inherited a top-notch Customs department.
That is
not just flannel produced by the department's PR, it is a
fact
established by reputable international surveys and
it is also our
observation. Customs protects the border
and collects duties efficiently
and with minimum
disruption to trade.
The bad news is that the Ministry of
Agriculture and Forestry (MAF)
continues to encroach on
the border protection work of Customs. Other
agencies,
like Immigration, are quite happy to delegate
front-line
duties to border protection professionals. But
not MAF.
Have you noticed that, these days, after going
through the Customs queue
and waiting for your baggage to
come out of the belt, you have to go
through another
lengthy queue? You hand out a form to a MAF official
who
then decides, based largely on intuition, whether or
not to screen you.
The people from Customs upstairs,
whose job is to detect drug smugglers
and illegal
immigrants are apparently not to be trusted with
figuring
out whether you are likely to be trying to
smuggle apples.
When MAF officials find bugs in
containers, they promise to stop every
shipment for the
importer in question (or for other companies
importing
from the same supplier) for the next five
shipments or the next twelve
months, whichever occurs
first. These stops are to be accompanied by
charges of
$100 an hour and the intention appears to be
clearly
punitive. Notice that they are not punishing an
accredited operator for
failing to detect risks and to
alert MAF, they are punishing importers
whose suppliers
may not have done the right thing.
In reality, this is
not going to work. They just don't have the manpower
to
inspect so many low-risk containers - a typical case of
bureaucratic
over-reach. Some importers will be put
through a lot of inconvenience
and expense and MAF will,
no doubt, be asking you for more 'resources'
(a.k.a.
money). This tactic seemed to work a treat with the
last
government: just have a look at MAF staffing levels
in 1999 and in 2009.
We suspect that you and your
colleagues aren't quite so gullible.
Now, this has been
going on for a very long time. About twenty years
ago,
Sir Jeffrey Palmer asked Gerald Hensley to look at
border
protection agencies and he recommended setting up
a single agency. Ten
years later, a National government
asked Sir Ron Carter to do a similar
review and his
recommendation was essentially the same: form a
single
border protection agency.
The government changed
before a decision was made and the new Labour
ministers,
Phillida Bunkle and Marion Hobbs, dismissed
the
recommendation on the grounds that Labour had
promised the Greens that
it would maintain a border
agency dedicated to 'biosecurity'. The
Ministers said
that they would get Customs and MAF to work
better
together.
Ten years on, the departments have
come up with a proposal for something
called a "Trade
Single Window". All they need is $120 million, more
or
less. We consider this proposal to be an answer in
search of a question.
You really should dust up the old
reports. A single organisation will,
of necessity,
provide a single window. Customs use a modern
relational
database and we see no need to spend huge
amounts of money on another
big computer project.
There
is also some unfinished business that you may want to turn
your
attention to: (1) a Law Commission report to do away
with excessive
departmental powers of seizure was
dismissed by the previous government
on spurious grounds;
(2) Customs gave a monopoly to an outfit called ECN
to
clip the ticket on every import and export and, despite
Ministerial
promises to the contrary, this profitable
contract was never put up for
public tender; and (3) New
Zealand importers still have to go through
the absurdity
of paying GST to Customs only to claim it back from
the
Inland Revenue a month or two later, while in
Australia they are treated
as a simple balancing debit
and credit on the same statement.
The current recession
means that you need to raise the bar on the
quality of
government's spending. Importers expect our border
protection
agencies to continue to improve services and
reduce red tape. The only
significant change in this area
that the last government managed to make
during the nine
years that it was in power was the creation of an
import
transaction tax. We expect much better from you.
Let us know if we
can
help.
ENDS