Horizons Regional Council Proposed ‘One Plan’
PRESS RELEASE
4 July 2008
For immediate
release
Horizons Regional Council Proposed ‘One
Plan’
Rural Women New Zealand is calling for less bureaucracy and a back-to-basics approach in response to Horizons Regional Council’s proposed ‘One Plan’. The Regional Council is currently hearing submissions on the Plan, which could set in place far-reaching restrictions on the use of rural land.
Rural Women New Zealand spokesperson, Margaret Millard says, “If local government wants to be of assistance to rural communities, a less hidebound and wasteful bureaucracy would be a good start.”
Rural Women New Zealand says Horizons
Regional Council’s resources should be focused on basic
infrastructure issues rather than non-specific environmental
outcomes where the costs are clear but the benefits are
not.
“If Horizons Regional Council were to focus on its
core activities, it could substantially cut both expenditure
and rates, which would make the region a more attractive
place for farming families and for the wider community,”
says Millard.
Horizons Regional Council needs to exercise caution and fiscal prudence before implementing any unnecessarily burdensome and impractical regulatory processes and activities, Rural Women New Zealand says.
In its submission, Rural Women New Zealand has called for the proposed One Plan to be amended so that only activities causing significant adverse effects are captured by the regulations.
“For the good of the community, the Council needs to avoid basing its decisions on pessimistic precautionary predictions. It should confine its regulatory controls to actual and demonstrable significant adverse effects.”
In addition Rural Women New Zealand believes Horizons Regional Council does not have the resources to provide practical, cost effective and timely delivery of the Whole Farm Business Plans (WFBP) scheme, which is a cornerstone of the proposed One Plan.
“All references in
the rules that express or imply the compulsory imposition of
WFBPs as a condition of consent need to be deleted,” says
Millard. “Unless the One Plan is amended appropriately,
rural communities are in danger of being stifled by
regulation without knowledge, ending in rhetoric before
results and systems before
people”.
-Ends-