LINZ reviews the Rules for Cadastral Survey
19 October 2007
Media Release
LINZ reviews the Rules for Cadastral Survey
The Surveyor-General has released for public consultation proposed new Rules for Cadastral Survey. [1]
Surveyor-General Dr Don Grant says the current Rules were derived from the Survey Regulations 1998 which don't fully reflect changes made in the Cadastral Survey Act 2002.
"The proposed new Rules are designed to better reflect these changes and have been reviewed in line with Land Information New Zealand's wider regulatory move to optimal regulation (see explanation below)," said Dr Grant.
The
Rules are the primary tools for setting standards
for:
• defining the boundaries of rights and
interests in land
• marking these
boundaries
• creating parcels (and their
appellations)
• cadastral survey plans and
datasets that are lodged with Land Information New
Zealand.
Proposed changes to the current Rules
include:
• boundary marking often not required
• new boundary accuracy standards.
To read the proposed new Rules and background information, go to www.linz.govt.nz and see "Consulting on" on the home page.
Feedback is invited from land owners, surveyors, those transacting or registering land, land developers, Territorial Authorities and others involved or interested in cadastral surveying.
Consultation on the proposed new Rules for Cadastral Survey started on 15 October 2007 and feedback to LINZ must be received by 1 February 2008.
Background information - What is optimal regulation?
Over the past three years, LINZ has been changing the way its regulators determine when and how to intervene in the market.
"We are not focussed on telling suppliers how to do something. Instead, we are concentrating on what should be delivered so that we only intervene where necessary," said General Manager of Regulatory Warwick Quinn.
A number of other government agencies are doing similar work. "The common theme we are all working towards is ensuring a good outcome - identifying risks and mitigating them at the right levels. Generally, the higher the risk, the higher the level of intervention. On the other hand, if a risk is low, it may be best to do nothing," said Mr Quinn.
More information about LINZ's move towards optimal regulation is available in Landscan on the LINZ website (www.linz.govt.nz).
ends