Maxim Institute - real issues 14 December 2006
Maxim Institute - real issues - No 235 14 December 2006
www.maxim.org.nz
Britain's breaking down
Maori
immersion schools deliver good results
A flawed vision of
collective security
IN THE NEWS Treaty claim deadline set Committee recommends Easter Trading Australia lifts ban on cloning
BRITAIN'S BREAKING DOWN
Britain's debate on poverty and family breakdown was electrified this week by a new report into what used to be called "the condition of England"; examining the causes of poverty, crime and addiction, and how to tackle the problem of social disconnection.
The Conservative Party's Social Justice Policy Group, chaired by former Party leader Iain Duncan-Smith, has released a report titled Breakdown Britain; an in-depth analysis of social disconnection and its causes, including family breakdown, addictions, joblessness, educational failure and indebtedness. The report highlights the vital importance of civil society in dealing with these problems and examines the relationship between social policy and its consequences.
The report affirms the central importance of marriage in halting the cycle of family breakdown and producing good outcomes for children. Identifying the "three d's" of dysfunction, dissolution and 'dadlessness', it traces the well-travelled road between family breakdown and poverty, welfare dependency, crime and delinquency. It follows the evidence, stating that politicians can no longer ignore family structure and that marriage is a vital social glue. Recognising that children find their connection in families, the report also flags a move away from "child-centred" policy toward "family-centred" policy and affirms the importance of relational connectedness.
Reports like this affirm what we intuitively know. Family breakdown has a social cost. Marriage is a strong protector against poverty and homelessness and is important for social connection. Young people raised with two parents have better outcomes. And government bureaucracies can't help people as well as families, friends, neighbours, communities and good Samaritans can. Having boldly stated the obvious, the British conservatives now face the challenge of doing something constructive about it.
Read the report,
Breakdown Britain
Write
to the editor
MAORI
IMMERSION SCHOOLS DELIVER GOOD RESULTS The Ministry of
Education has just released a new report, He Kete Raraunga,
describing pupil achievement in reading, writing and
mathematics in Maori Medium Education, drawing on data from
the NCEA and asTTLe (an assessment tool). The report loosely
defines Maori Medium Education as schooling where pupils are
taught in Te Reo Maori for more than half of each teaching
day. One major finding was that pupils with longer periods
of immersion in Te Reo Maori are more likely to have higher
levels of achievement. The report also emphasised the link
to the family, finding that those pupils who speak even
minimal Te Reo Maori at home achieve better than those who
speak none. While there are different vehicles for the
delivery of education to Maori pupils, it appears that
immersion schools are delivering favourable results. This
new report follows previous Ministry of Education research
which has found that Maori pupils in immersion schools
perform well in the NCEA and historically have achieved
better in School Certificate and Sixth Form English,
science, mathematics and Te Reo Maori than pupils in the
English medium classes or immersion classes of mainstream
schools, or in bilingual settings. These early NCEA
results should not be treated as definitive of achievement
at immersion or bilingual schools; the sector is still small
and in its infancy and a handful of pupils or one school
achieving highly can skew results. However, it does show
that immersion schools may be providing a solution to the
problem of under-achievement of Maori pupils. Schools need
to have increased freedom over their operations to enable
them to easily choose to become an immersion or bilingual
school or to offer an alternative curriculum and
examinations to best suit their pupils. It is also critical
to address the problem of teacher retention and supply in
immersion schools and in Maori education generally, by
extending successful professional development programmes and
by introducing flexible pay arrangements to address the
problem in full. Read the report, He Kete Raraunga
Write
to the editor
A
FLAWED VISION OF COLLECTIVE SECURITY Kofi Annan, the
Secretary-General of the United Nations for the past 10
years, is stepping down at the end of 2006. In his last
address to an American audience, he indirectly criticised US
foreign policy and outlined five principles for
international order: collective security; global solidarity;
the rule of law; mutual accountability and multilateralism,
and reaffirmed the role of the UN in fostering global
security and the rule of law. The main idea behind
collective security is that each country opposes acts of
aggression by other countries, knowing that other countries
will oppose any aggressive acts that it commits. This
premise is flawed because it assumes countries will commit
to opposing aggression against the current world order even
when that would be inconsistent with or irrelevant to their
national interests. Screbrinica, Rwanda and Darfur all show
that the collective will of the so-called "international
community" is worth nothing when wilfully opposed. The
internationalist view of collective security espoused by Mr
Annan is overly optimistic about human nature. In reality,
international politics is much more sombre. Optimism must be
grounded in a healthy scepticism of global governance.
Prudent statesmen know that there will be a compromise
between the demands of justice and what can actually be
achieved among countries in any given situation. The demands
of the "international community" always come a distant
second to national interests. Collective security and
multilateralism is an approach to international order that
is very difficult to put into practice. It is a utopian and
unrealisable vision. While in some cases the UN will be the
most appropriate organisation to keep the peace and enforce
law, every country, including a "great state" like the US,
can work just as effectively towards the objectives outlined
by Secretary-General Annan through bilateral negotiation,
alliances and regional organisations. The way to peace does
not of necessity, pass through New York. Write to the
editor
IN
THE NEWS TREATY CLAIM DEADLINE SET A final date for
historical Treaty of Waitangi claims has now been set with
the passage of the Treaty of Waitangi Amendment Act 2006.
Historical claims must be filed with the Waitangi Tribunal
by 1 September 2008. The government says that the deadline
will give greater certainty and facilitate resolution of
claims. Most parties appear to agree; the Bill passed by a
large majority, 104 – 9 votes, on 7 December 2006 Read
the Treaty of Waitangi Amendment Bill
COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDS EASTER TRADING The Commerce Select Committee
reported to Parliament this week on two Bills proposing to
allow trade during Easter. The first would allow
territorial authorities to choose whether to be covered by
the Bill and allow trading on both Good Friday and Easter
Sunday. The second Bill relates only to Easter Sunday and
would give territorial authorities, in consultation with
their community, the option to trade on this day. The Select
Committee recommended that both Bills be passed. Read the
Bills and the Select Committee reports: Shop Trading Hours
Act Repeal (Easter Trading) Amendment Bill
Easter
Sunday Shop Trading Amendment Bill
AUSTRALIA
LIFTS BAN ON CLONING Last week Australia overturned its
ban on therapeutic cloning, despite both the Prime Minister
and leader of the Opposition casting a vote against it. The
passing of this controversial bill will permit scientists to
create cloned human embryos from which stem cells can be
harvested for tissue transplant. The new leader of the Labor
party, Kevin Rudd, was reported as saying he found it very
difficult to support a law that allows human life to be
created for the single and explicit purpose of
experimentation and ultimate destruction. The Bill passed in
the House of Representatives with 82 votes in favor and 62
votes opposed. Read the Prohibition of Human Cloning for
Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research
Amendment Bill 2006
TALKING
POINT "What Samuel Johnson said of a second marriage
should caution those who wish to rely on collective security
as a basis for an enlightened world order: it is a triumph
of hope over experience." Robert G. Kaufman, Professor of
Political Science A registered charitable trust, funded by
donations, Maxim Institute values your interest and
support. ENDS