“The Family Court has been a major contributor to a succession of child murders in New Zealand over recent years”,
Darryl Ward, spokesperson for Families Apart Require Equality (FARE), stated today.
“As a nation we are deeply saddened by the tragic deaths in Nelson on Sunday of Alice, Maria and Cherie Perkin, and
their mother Rosemary Perkin. The Nelson girls were just eight, six and 23 months old respectively. Yet there has been a
succession of such incidents in New Zealand in recent years. In 1995 for instance, Tiffany, Holly and Claudia Bristol
were murdered by their father, who also killed himself at the same time during acrimonious litigation. The Bristol
children were just nine, five and two when they died. The Perkin and Bristol children were young, healthy, and in the
prime of life, till they died at the hands of one of their parents who was locked in a destructive Court battle.”
“In these cases the problem is the Family Court, which almost invariably encourages separating parents to compete with
each other in a winner-takes-all battle to have control of the children. It is the custodial parent who will get
effective ownership and control of the children, and all the benefits that come with them. The Family Court imposes a
win-lose outcome. In this environment parents are driven to fight over the most precious thing in their lives, their
children. Parents become so desperate they become irrational, and faced with potentially losing their children (or
control of their children), the parents can and are driven to the extreme of murdering themselves, and their children.”
“The Family Court urgently needs to change its procedures to prevent more children dying in this way. In the USA, and
many other countries, a far better system known as ‘shared parenting’ has been adopted. Instead of the parents being
forced to compete with each other to be the ‘winner’ or sole physical custodian of the children, they are both made
physical custodians. The parents are encouraged to work together instead of competing with each other. If one parent is
uncooperative, they stand to have the Court remove their joint custodial status. Thus, instead of parents being forced
to fight, they are encouraged to cooperate.”
“The benefits of shared parenting are dramatic. The number of ongoing court cases is halved, as arguing between parents
is greatly reduced. The divorce rate is dramatically reduced, as is the uptake of social welfare benefits. The only
negative outcome is reduced earnings for lawyers, psychologists and others who profit from the suffering endured by
children caused by the current regime”.
“Under current New Zealand family law the Family Court could exercise effective shared parenting, but the Judges for
some inexplicable reason will not consider shared parenting as the preferred outcome to protect the welfare of children.
Earlier this year, ACT MP Dr. Muriel Newman introduced a Private Member’s Bill that aimed to reduce the tensions between
parents by favoring the shared parenting model that has been so successful overseas. The Government rejected Newman’s
Bill outright, and would not even allow it to go to a select committee”.
“In Nelson this weekend children died once again because the Family Court, and the Government, are not fulfilling their
responsibilities to the community, and refuse to use up-to-date and non-adversarial techniques to resolve child custody
and access disputes. The Family Court is breaking the fundamental principles of the laws it is supposed to administer by
consistently not acting in the best interests of children”.
FARE calls on the Principal Family Court Judge, and the Government, to publicly state what they are doing to eliminate
the tensions between divorcing parents and reduce the risk of this latest tragedy in Nelson being repeated yet again,
which will most certainly happen again if nothing is done”, concluded Ward.
ends Enquiries to Darryl Ward 025 230 1667