The Tragedy Of James Whakaruru
The death of four year old James Whakaruru is a grim
reminder of the dangers
facing children who grow up in
s severely dysfunctional families. In most of
these
families, education achievement is minimal, violence is
rife, drug and
alcohol dependency is part of the daily
lifestyle, and parental responsibility
is negligible.
These are the families where children are maimed and
murdered,
not by violent strangers, but by their own
family.
According to the Minister of Social welfare,
over the last five years, 13
children are known to
have died as a result of homicide. Of these only
two
died at the hands of a non-family person. Most
of these children had been
subjected to what amounts
to prolonged torture by the very people in their
lives
who should have protected, loved and nurtured them.
The
Government's response to this latest death has been a
welcome call for an
inquiry into why this little
boy, who had been known to the authorities
previously
as the victim of earlier violence by his mother's partner,
had not
been kept safe. But the Government and all
of the other political parties,
except ACT, appear to be
reluctant to look at the deeper issues.
Research has now
established a clear link between family breakdown and
child
abuse and between family breakdown and crime. Yet
we fail to look seriously at
policies, which are
clearly contributing to family breakdown - we fail
to
address the underlying causes of these disastrous
outcomes for children.
According to the Children and
Young Person's Service, 17 children a day are
seriously
abused in this country, with some 90,0000 children a year
being at
risk. This is not a small problem we face but
a massive one. Such statistics
paints New Zealand as
one of the western world's most dangerous countries
in
which to bring up children.
Until we look at the
underlying incentives that operate in the
legislative
framework of social policy, we will never
get on top of this problem. We have
a situation where
the benefit has produced third generation benefit
dependency.
When a system pays people to do
nothing, it destroys the sense of
responsibility
that goes hand in hand with working for a living and
striving to
make a better life for your children.
When
a benefit system pays families if they split apart, we
wonder why we have
the highest percentage of sole
parents in the western world. When a benefit
system
pays the mother more if she has more babies then she
will have more
babies. According to an answer this week
from the Associate Minister of Social
Services, Work
and Income, a few women on the DPB have had eight
additional
babies. This situations is not right and
it was never the intention of the
DPB.
Women on the
DPB are unsupported as they bring up their children and
their
children are often denied regular access to their
father. In fact, in the case
of little James, his
own father was denied access, while the man who
killed
him had free access.
The ACT Party believes it
is time that the New Zealand Parliament undertook
a
comprehensive review of all laws relating to the
family. The Australian
Parliament has carried out
such a review and produced a series
of
recommendations to their Parliament of ways to
strengthen the family unit.
If New Zealanders believe
that a strong and loving family, committed
to
building a decent life for themselves is the best
and safest environment in
which to raise children,
then it is time to support the family instead
of
weakening it and producing the sort of welfare
dependency dysfunction that has
contributed to the death
of James
Whakaruru.
ENDS