Andrew Little Still Splurging On Consultants For His Poorly-timed Health Restructure
Andrew Little must explain why he continues to splurge on consulting firms for the government’s poorly-timed health restructure instead of focusing on frontline services while we are in the midst of a pandemic, says National’s Health spokesperson, Dr Shane Reti.
In reply to a question from me, Andrew Little has revealed spending of $7 million on consultants in just a year including $6 million on 21 Ernst & Young staff. Not one of these dollars has delivered a single health outcome to date.
“That $ 7 million could have funded nine resourced ICU beds which is more beds than what is currently available in any of Hutt Valley, Lakes, Mid Central, Northland, South Canterbury, Tairawhiti, Wairarapa, West Coast or Whanganui DHBs.
“The government’s costly distraction with restructuring the health system in the middle of a Pandemic may explain why our Intensive Care Units were so unprepared for Delta. New Zealand has around a third of the ICU beds of Great Britain per capita.
“They should have focused on beefing up our ICU capacity instead of consultancy fees but is hardly surprising from a government that has totally failed to prepare our health system for a Delta outbreak
It is incomprehensible that this government thinks it is a good idea to restructure the health system in a pandemic. Put resources where they’re needed!”
The answer to my Written Parliamentary Question on Consultants Fees is copied below.
Reply 39563 (2021) has been answered to
Dr Shane Reti 12 Oct
2021
Portfolio: Health (Hon
Andrew Little)
Question: Which
consulting firms, if any, have advised the health sector
restructuring Transition Unit and how much have each been
paid?
Reply: I am advised that the
following consulting firms have provided advice to the
Health and Disability Transition Unit: • Arkus
Communications Limited • Ernst & Young Limited •
Finora Management Limited • Kāhui Tautoko Consulting •
Korn Ferry • Mischewski Consulting • NZ Institute of
Economic Research • PAAS Partners Limited • Sapere
Research Group • Senate Communications Limited • Shea
Pita & Associates • Sonia Wansbrough & Associates
• Sue Suckling Holdings Limited • Te Amokura Consultants
The total spend (including actual contract fee, expenses,
All of Government fee spend to 30 June 2021, and estimated
spend to 31 August 2021) against the consulting firms listed
above with the Health and Disability Review Transition Unit
is set out in the table attached. Please note that the
financial information for Ernst & Young Limited listed
above differs from my reply to written parliamentary
question 39564 (2021). The information for written
parliamentary question 39564 (2021) is the actual spend at
30 June 2021. The information for written parliamentary
question 39563 (2021) is updated to reflect actual spend at
30 June 2021 and estimated spend to 31 August
2021.
Table 39563: The total spend (including actual contract fee, expenses, All of Government fee spend to 30 June 2021, and estimated spend to 31 August 2021) against the consulting firms that have provided advise to the Health and Disability Review Transition Unit.
Consulting Firm | $, excl. GST |
Arkus Communications Limited | 155,200.00 |
Ernst & Young Limited | 5,722,520.26 |
Finora Management Limited | 324,737.69 |
Kahui Tautoko Consulting | 51,465.56 |
Mischewski Consulting Limited | 2,148.75 |
NZ Institute of Economic Research | 139,887.53 |
PAAS Partners Limited | 4,028.71 |
Sapere Research Group | 244,391.01 |
Senate Communications Limited | 245,000.76 |
Shea Pita & Associates | 29,381.31 |
Sonia Wansbrough & Associates | 67,690.00 |
Sue Suckling Holdings Limited | 205,245.71 |
Te Amokura Consultants Limited | 55,380.00 |