Mallard Fails To Give Taxpayers A Straight Answer

Published: Wed 5 May 2021 08:39 AM
Trevor Mallard has confirmed he is unfit to be Parliament’s Speaker by failing to answer several important questions relating to the false rape accusation saga that cost taxpayers more than $330,000, Shadow Leader of the House Chris Bishop says.
“Trevor Mallard failed to justify his actions before Parliament last night. Taxpayers deserved straight answers after he cost them more than $330,000 but those answers never came.
“The big question Trevor Mallard repeatedly dodged is: why did he not just apologise once he knew he had wrongly accused the Parliamentary staffer of rape, which in his own words was within 24 hours, rather than letting this drag for 18 months at taxpayers’ expense?
“Taxpayers are also still in the dark as to how much more Mr Mallard’s subsequent behaviour, including his refusal to apologise and the ‘threats’ that followed, has cost them in damages.”
Other questions that remain unanswered for Mr Mallard, the Prime Minister and Labour are:Why did Mr Mallard’s lawyers tell the plaintiff in the defamation case that he intended to plead truth (ie. prove he was a rapist) when he knew that claim was incorrect?Did Mr Mallard follow through on this threat and plead truth in any statement of defence filed with the court, when he knew that claim was incorrect?Why did Mr Mallard’s lawyers tell the plaintiff in the defamation case that he intended to defend any claim “vigorously”? In particular, why did his lawyers say to the plaintiff that “the question of his reputation, and his conduct, will be very much the centrepiece of any public proceeding”?Was the Prime Minister aware that Mr Mallard knew the rape claim to be false but had threatened the plaintiff that he intended to claim it was true anyway?Did he mislead the Select Committee by stating he had no knowledge of the case when it is apparent he was briefed twice in the issue by his CEO?
“Trevor Mallard behaved in a threatening and bullying way. In any other workplace across New Zealand he would be sacked,” Mr Bishop says.
“The Prime Minister might like to reflect on the fact that if Trevor Mallard was a National MP, she would be the first in line to call for his resignation.”

Next in New Zealand politics

Fair Pay Agreements To Improve Pay And Conditions For Essential Workers
By: New Zealand Government
Government Sets Pay And Workforce Expectations For The Public Sector
By: New Zealand Government
Budget 2021 Reprioritises Nearly $1 Billion
By: New Zealand Government
Statement On The Speaker And Annual Review Debate
By: New Zealand Government
Independent Review To Explore Future For Local Government
By: New Zealand Government
PM Ardern And PM Morrison - Commencement Of Two-way Quarantine-free Travel Between Australia And New Zealand
By: New Zealand Government
Labour Stuck In 1970s With National Awards 2.0
By: New Zealand National Party
ACT Would Repeal Undemocratic Compulsory Unionism
By: ACT New Zealand
Bus Drivers And Supermarket Workers Will Welcome Fair Pay Agreements
By: First Union
E tū Welcomes Next Steps For Fair Pay Agreements
By: E tu
Fair Pay Agreements Should Be Terminated
By: Business NZ
FPAs Have No Place In Modern Workplace - Canterbury Chamber
By: Canterbury Employers' Chamber Of Commerce
No Positive Outcomes From FPA Proposal
Fair Pay Agreements Good News For Employees - Contractors Need Protection Too
By: Public Service Association
Pay Restrictions Punish Public Servants Who Protected Us From Covid-19
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media