Cabinet Paper shows NZ not ready for marijuana referendum
A Cabinet Paper leaked to National which will be considered by the Government tomorrow shows New Zealand will head into
the recreational marijuana referendum with many unanswered questions, National’s Drug Reform spokesperson Paula Bennett
says.
“Cabinet will tomorrow consider four different options for the referendum but no matter which option it choses, there
are huge holes.
“The Cabinet Paper is clear that smoking marijuana when you’re under the age of 25 is detrimental for development of the
brain, and yet it recommends that the legal age should be 20. The legal age seems to have been plucked out of thin air.
“The paper acknowledges that regular marijuana use increases the risk of developing depression, psychosis and
schizophrenia and is especially harmful to those under 25-years-old. It also acknowledges that there is a one in six
chance of young people becoming dependent. This would result in further demand for mental health services.
“There is no mention about what level of tax will be imposed on marijuana, will it be the same as tobacco and alcohol?
Will it really get rid of the illicit market if it’s taxed at 40 or 50 per cent? Will a much higher tax rate be needed
if they will test 10 per cent of the product to ensure THC levels are low?
“The Government hasn’t identified any budget for ensuring the public knows about the pros and cons of legalisation in
the lead up to the referendum. Given how much this would impact our communities, New Zealanders need to know what they
are voting for.
“Only one of the options being considered will give New Zealanders some certainty about what they’re voting for – the
other options will mean a huge lack of information.
“Every option takes us straight to legalisation instead of decriminalisation. Many other countries consider
decriminalisation first before leaping straight to legalisation.
“National understands that as usual with this Government, the coalition has been unable to reach a consensus and the
decision around which option they will choose has been holding up the process.
“The problem with that is there isn’t time for yet more coalition disagreements on an issue this important.”
Notes to editors: Below are the four options presented in the Cabinet Paper:
The 2020 Cannabis Referendum proposals outline four options including;
• A general question consistent with the undertaking in the Confidence and Supply agreement: “Do you support legalising
the personal use of recreational cannabis?” This would not be accompanied by any legal framework or other policy
decisions and it would be left to a subsequent Parliament to determine what to do in the event of a ‘yes’ vote.
• A questions referring to a specific policy framework document setting out the basic principles of what legalisation
for personal use of recreational cannabis in New Zealand would entail: “Do you support legalising recreational cannabis
in accordance with [published policy document]?” A ‘yes’ vote would result in the duly elected government and Parliament
having some moral imperative, but no obligation, to enact law changes consistent with that policy document;
• A question referring to draft legislation that outlines the regulatory model for cannabis: ‘Do you support legalising
the personal use of recreational cannabis in accordance with [published draft legislation]?” Similar to option 2, a
‘yes’ vote would result in the duly elected government and Parliament having some moral imperative, but no obligation,
to enact the legislation.
• A question referring to legislation already enacted but conditional on an affirmative vote on the referendum: “Do you
support legalising recreational cannabis in accordance with the [Drug Reform] Act 20XX?” A ‘yes’ vote would trigger the
legislation coming into effect.