Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More
Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

PQ 4. Prime Minister—Statements


[Sitting date: 02 December 2014. Volume:702;Page:4. Text is subject to correction.]

4. Rt Hon WINSTON PETERS (Leader—NZ First) to the Prime Minister : Does he stand by all his statements?

Rt Hon JOHN KEY (Prime Minister): Yes.

Rt Hon Winston Peters : Is it his position that Mr Goff should not have, as the Prime Minister has stated, leaked the Gwyn report? [Interruption]

Mr SPEAKER : Order! Could we ask the Rt Hon Winston Peters to repeat the question?

Rt Hon Winston Peters : Is it his position that Mr Goff should not have, as the Prime Minister has stated, leaked the Gwyn report?

Rt Hon JOHN KEY : Yes, that would be my view, because that was the confidentiality agreement that surrounded it.

Rt Hon Winston Peters : Is it his position that this alleged leak is a matter for police investigation; if so, why?

Rt Hon JOHN KEY : No, it is a matter for the inspector-general.

Rt Hon Winston Peters : If that is the case, why, then, was he prepared as Prime Minister to again take on a Minister who had been stood down, namely Peter Dunne, who leaked four times from the Intelligence and Security Committee?

Rt Hon JOHN KEY : That is not proven. The member is making it up, as he often does. [Interruption]

Mr SPEAKER : Order! We are breaking for Christmas next week, not this week.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Rt Hon Winston Peters : If that is a fact, then is it not also true that he has one set of standards for him and his colleagues and an entirely different and higher one for everybody else?

Rt Hon JOHN KEY : No, I have the same set of standards. What is quite clear is that Mr Goff leaked the report. In fact, he did not own up to that on day one. He forgot that, but he eventually remembered it a day later. He did that, as the inspector-general herself has said, because he wanted to get a favourable spin or coverage—those were the words. Unfair coverage was put on this side of the House. See, it is an interesting scenario, is it not? It is an interesting scenario when you go out and leak a report before it is due out to try to get favourable coverage because you know it will not stack up. Unfortunately, it backfired.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.