The chilling effect of TICs
Posted by Clare Curran on October 14th, 2013
Update: The second reading of TICs is tomorrow. It seems likely the Govt will try to rush through the committee stages and third reading this week.If so, this is an
extraordinary abuse of process, because there is almost no time to consider the impact of the Minister’s SOP and to
undertake the debate that needs to be had. One fo the worst things about this Bill is the refusal to have meaningful and
respectful discussions with the businesses which will be most affected, or to acknowledge the impact on NZ consumers.
Please help to fight this Bill’s passage.
Tell Amy Adams what you think by emailing her at: Amy.Adams@parliament.govt.nz or Selwyn.Office@parliament.govt.nz. You can contact her on twitter @amyadamsMP
Amy Adams tonight released last minute amendments to the Telecommunications Interception Capability and Security Bill
(TICs). The fact that she has introduced an SOP at such a late stage indicates she and her government is concerned that
there are serious deficiencies with the Bill as it came back from the select committee.
However, her amendments are not substantive and appear to be window dressing. They reflect the hurried passage of this
Bill, the lack of consultation with industry and the likely consequences on the privacy of Kiwi citizens and detrimental
impact on NZ tech companies and their ability to innovate.
That she is introducing an SOP at all indicates that the National Govt majority on the committee did not, or would not,
consider the implications of the Bill to NZ-based and internally-based tech companies.
In particular;
Amy Adams has now signalled there will be a more rigorous assessment of the costs and benefits, including the impact of
the cost on the telecommunications company of requirements under the new law. In the Labour minority report we said:
“Labour notes that subsequent submissions to the select committee by several network operators outlined potential
significant annual operating costs and the potential capital expenditure costs. The committee did not seek advice on
these supplementary submissions and the economic impact was therefore not taken into account. In our view this was
negligent and irresponsible.”
The Govt’s majority select ctte refused to take account of the warnings raised by network operators of the impact on
their business by this Bill. While she is now obviously acknowledging that there may well be an impact Amy Adams needs
to specify exactly what a “more rigorous assessment of costs and benefits” will involve and where the Bill will reflect
that.
Read the rest of this post here
ENDS