Dunne: drug law reversing onus of proof on way
Test change
Hon Peter
Dunne
Associate Minister of
Health
Monday 16 July 2012 Media
Release
Dunne: drug law reversing onus of proof
on way
Cabinet has agreed key details of new psychoactive substances drug legislation that will require distributors and producers of party pills and other legal highs to prove they are safe before they can sell them, Associate Health Minister Peter Dunne announced today.
“As promised, we are reversing the onus of proof. If they cannot prove that a product is safe, then it is not going anywhere near the marketplace,” Mr Dunne said.
“The legislation will be introduced to Parliament later this year and be in force by around the middle of next year.
‘In the meantime, the Temporary Class Drug Notices – the holding measure we have successfully put in place – will be rolled over as required so there is no window of opportunity for any banned substances to come back on the market before the permanent law comes in,” he said.
“The new law means the game of ‘catch up’ with the legal highs industry will be over once and for all.
“I have been driving this for a considerable time. None of these products will come to market if they have not been proven safe – and the cost of proving that will be on those who make and sell them, as it should be,” he said.
“Quite simply they will now have to do what any manufacturer of any product that is consumed or ingested already has to do – make sure it is safe.”
Mr Dunne said that in the past year the Government had put a serious dent in the synthetic cannabis market with the Temporary Class Drug Notices.
“We have seen a 75 percent fall in the number of emergency call incidents around synthetic cannabis products according to National Poisons Centre data.
“That decline began the very month the Notices came into effect,” he said.
“We have banned more than 28 substances and effectively taken more than 50 products that contain them off the market. The latest four substances were just banned on Friday.
“We are winning the battle and we are about to deliver the knockout blow with this legislation,” he said.
Mr Dunne said Cabinet has agreed to establish a new regulator within the Ministry of Health which will be responsible for issuing approvals.
“Companies wishing to sell these products will need to apply to this regulator with scientific data similar to that which is required for the assessment of new medicines.
“For example, they would need to provide toxicology data and results of human clinical trials,” Mr Dunne said.
These tests will prevent products which cause common adverse reactions from being approved for legal sale.
“However, in the end these are pharmacologically active substances, and there is always some degree of risk in taking such products because people can have varying reactions to them,” he said.
Even once approved, any such products are likely to be subject to retail restrictions which will further reduce their potential to cause harm, he said.
“The details of these restrictions have not yet been agreed, but I fully expect that they will involve a legal minimum purchase age and restrictions on the types of premises where they can be sold.
“The legislation will be introduced later this year and will be in place by August 2013. In the meantime all of the existing Temporary Class Drug Notices will be rolled over for a further 12 months so there will be no slippage between them and the coming legislation,” Mr Dunne said.
The Cabinet paper and the regulatory
impact statement can be found at
www.health.govt.nz/about-ministry/legislation-and-regulation/regulatory-impact-statements/new-regulatory-regime-psychoactive-substances
Ends.
Questions and
Answers
What are low risk
psychoactive substances?
This refers to new psychoactive substances for
which the risks are low enough that they meet the approval
criteria set by the regulatory. We say 'low-risk' to avoid
implying that they will be entirely safe, as there will
always be some risk. This is because different people have
different reactions to pharmacologically active
substances.
Why are we doing
this?
We are doing this
because the current situation is untenable. Current
legislation is ineffective in dealing with the rapid growth
in synthetic psychoactive substances which can be tweaked to
be one step ahead of controls. Products are being sold
without any controls over their ingredients, without testing
requirements, or controls over where they can be sold. The
government must prove a risk of harm before controlling a
substance. The new regime will require a supplier or
manufacturer to apply to a regulator for a safety assessment
before any product can be sold.
Are we
legalising drugs?
No. The
regime will provide stronger controls over psychoactive
substances. At the moment, these products are unregulated,
with no control over ingredients, place of sale, or who they
can be sold to. Because they are synthetic substances, there
are a huge number of potential ingredients, which makes it
unfeasible to deal with them individually.
It will be
illegal to sell any product which has not been through an
assessment. There will be strict restrictions on where
products can be sold, the purchase age, and marketing
restrictions.
What would it cost a manufacturer
to take a product through the approval process, and how long
would it take?
Based on
initial proposals, it is estimated that the cost of testing
any product will be in the range of $1 million to $2 million
and will take between one and two years.
What will the implications of the new
regime be for cannabis?
The legal status of
cannabis will not change. This is because the regime will
only cover new psychoactive substances that are not already
classified under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975.
Why don’t you just ban
everything?
Legislation should not be used to
restrict behaviour that cannot be proved to be harmful.
Products that meet the approval criteria will be approved.
However, our position will still be that not using these
products is the safest option.
Is this a
stealth way of banning everything and never approving any
product?
No. Clear testing
requirements are being established to determine the risks of
psychoactive products. Products that meet the approval
criteria will be approved.
How will risk/safety be determined?
Consistent toxicological and behavioural testing will be required for every product seeking approval. A new regulator will be established to consider the data from this testing for each product. Products that meet the approval criteria will be approved.
What do you mean by the
regulator?
A regulator
will need to be established for psychoactive substances.
This regulator will oversee the approval of products,
monitor for compliance with post market restrictions, and
reassess products in light of any new evidence of harm that
might arise.
How many
drugs will get approved?
We don’t know this yet. Products that meet
the approval criteria will be approved. This will require
toxicological and behavioural testing.
How much will this
cost?
Modelling of the
start-up costs for the new regime is currently being worked
on. A detailed report on fee-setting and costing will be
provided to Cabinet by 1 October 2012.
We expect
that over time, the costs of this regime will be recuperated
through applications fees paid by industry.
Who will do the risk
assessments?
The new
regulator will consider toxicological and clinical data for
each product.
Does this mean the Government
is endorsing drugs?
No. At
the moment these products are available without any
information regarding their risks to health. We are
changing the system to require industry to prove they do not
pose a greater than a low risk of health before they may be
sold.
Will there be controls to stop children
buying these drugs from
dairies?
Yes, it is
intended that there will be restrictions on where substances
can be sold and a minimum purchase age. I will provide
Cabinet with full details of these restrictions by 1 October
2012.
What happens when the legislation
comes into force? Will everything be pulled from the
shelves?
Decisions have
not been made on this yet but there will likely be a lead in
time for industry to obtain the testing results needed.
Will this just backfire
and create a bigger black market?
No. We expect that having low risk psychoactive
products legally available will discourage consumers from
using the black market.