INDEPENDENT NEWS

50/50 split for passenger clearance costs

Published: Wed 15 Dec 2004 11:20 AM
15 December 2004
50/50 split for passenger clearance costs
The funding of passenger clearance services at New Zealand’s seven international airports will be split around 50/50 with the government contributing $55 million and industry contributing $49 million annually.
Announcing the decision today, Finance Minister Michael Cullen said the funding package had been developed after extensive consultations with key users and stakeholders and had won broad support although there were some areas of disagreement.
Raised security concerns and increasing passenger numbers had created pressure for more intensive and more efficient screening techniques which were expected to raise the cost from $55 million a year to $91 million and to raise industry’s costs by another $14 million a year.
“This addition in costs created the opportunity to review the whole funding system as it is inconsistent and ad hoc in nature with the government recovering some costs but not others and with the systems of cost recovery differing in both purpose and application between the different agencies.
“We have adopted a “primary beneficiary model” in which the costs are allocated according to where the principal benefit is derived,” Dr Cullen said.
“The small modification to this rule is that the government will heavily subsidise rather than fully fund biosecurity and customs services at the regional airports [Hamilton, Palmerston North, Dunedin and Queenstown] where the processing costs per passenger are significantly higher than at the larger metropolitan centres.
“The small user pays element is designed to send a pricing signal to the travelling public and will be charged to the airlines in the first instance but passed on to passengers through ticket prices,” Dr Cullen said.
Specific decisions are:
That the full cost of aviation security be met by the airlines and passengers as the prime beneficiaries of the service; That there be further consultation with industry early next year regarding how these costs should be allocated across airports; That the government fully fund current biosecurity and customs services at the metropolitan airports [Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch] and fund them at the regional international airports up to the per passenger rate of the third cheapest metropolitan airport and on a dollar for dollar ratio beyond that; That a cap be put on the industry’s contribution at regional airports equivalent to the per passenger rate of the second most expensive regional airport with the government meeting all costs above that level; That any new airport meet the full costs of government services.
ENDS

Next in New Zealand politics

PM’s Chatham House Speech
By: New Zealand Government
New Zealand Secures Major Free Trade Deal With European Union
By: New Zealand Government
New Measures To Help Manage COVID-19 As Country Stays At Orange
By: New Zealand Government
New Era For Better Health In Aotearoa New Zealand
By: New Zealand Government
Alcohol Harm Minimisation Bill Pulled From Biscuit Tin
By: Green Party
Wellington’s Rapid Transit Option Progresses To Next Stage
By: New Zealand Government
EU Market Remains Largely Closed To NZ Dairy
By: Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand
Winners And Losers In NZ-EU FTA
By: Business NZ
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media