Maharey Announces 'First Principles' Review
Maharey Announces 'First Principles' Review Of Training Opportunities And Youth Training Programmes
The Government is to review the Training Opportunities and Youth Training programmes Social Services and Employment Minister Steve Maharey announced today.
"Together Training Opportunities and Youth Training presently account for over $188 million of government expenditure. It is important that we ensure a quality spend, and quality outcomes.
"The objective is to undertake a 'first principles' review to establish future objectives for these programmes, and ensure that they meet the educational and employment needs of those people with significant histories of unemployment and/or no or low qualifications.
"The purpose of the review is to establish the appropriate future objectives for these programmes, and how we can improve their contribution in meeting the educational and employment needs of people with significant histories of unemployment and/or no or low qualifications. In the eight years since the Training Opportunities programme was established there have been many developments both within the community and government that have affected the way in which services are provided to such people.
"The Government considers it timely to consider the effect of these changes on these programmes. It is important to ensure, given our current understanding, that these programmes are best meeting the needs of this group.
"I have appointed a team to lead the review, comprising both experts from the education, and the training for employment sector, and representatives of key Government agencies. The terms of reference for the review, which I am also releasing today, were drawn up following consultations with stakeholders. I am confident that this review, led by a group of people bringing such expertise and knowledge about the issues facing the target groups for Youth Training and Youth training, will produce positive recommendations for the Government to consider," Steve Maharey said.
REVIEW OF YOUTH TRAINING AND TRAINING
OPPORTUNITIES –
TERMS OF REFERENCE
Context
1 The
Training Opportunities Programme (TOP) was established in
1993 to assist people with low qualifications or limited
skills to gain recognised qualifications (or credit towards
them), and to move into further education and training, or
employment.
2 Prior to the establishment of TOP,
during the 1980s and early 1990s, the Government funded
programmes to facilitate the entry or re-entry of youth and
long-term unemployed into the labour market in the form of
ACCESS and MACCESS. ACCESS had mainstream training
objectives, and MACCESS focused specifically on Mäori, and
was largely delivered through Mäori providers.
3 Since
its inception, the Training Opportunities Programme has been
based on the following premises about participation in the
labour market by unemployed people –
a skill deficits
are a major barrier to labour market participation;
b
there is a wide range of personal, social and economic
barriers that prevent unemployed people from entering or
re-entering the labour market;
c structured training,
based on the needs of the individual, plays an important
role in addressing such barriers and developing skills;
d
it is not only important for unemployed people to gain
skills, but also to have those skills formally recognised in
a way that employers acknowledge. Such recognition enhances
an individual’s prospects of gaining employment.
4 The
Training Opportunities Programme has been the single largest
employment intervention, with funding of $186 million in
1997/98 (its last year as a consolidated pool of funding).
As well as being targeted towards specific eligibility
groups, the programme has further participation goals for
particular groups (Mäori, Pacific people and women), and
outcome goals (qualifications attained, and subsequent
employment or education achieved).
5 Until 1998, TOP was
administered by Skill New Zealand and funded through Vote:
Education. From 1 July 1998 the funding was separated out
in the following way. Sixty-five percent of the total
funding of $186m ($121m) was transferred from Vote:
Education to Vote: Work and Income to allow the Department
of Work and Income (DWI) more flexibility in the use of
those funds associated with their clients. This was known
as Training Opportunities. The remaining thirty-five
percent ($65m) remained within Vote: Education and became
Youth Training. Eligibility for the programmes was divided
by age: Youth Training caters to 16 and 17 year olds,
Training Opportunities is for those aged 18 and over.
6
Skill New Zealand continues to manage the delivery of both
schemes, through contracts with both DWI and the Minister of
Education. Skill New Zealand undertakes an annual planning
process in each region on the trainee and labour market
needs of that area, and then purchases courses on a
contestable and/or negotiated basis against specified
outcomes. Skill New Zealand purchases most Training
Opportunities and Youth Training courses from private
education providers, with some polytechnics and wänanga also
contracted.
7 From 1 January 1999, twenty percent of the
Vote: Work and Income funding ($24m) was unconstrained to
enable this funding to be spent on employment related
initiatives other than Training Opportunities. This money
was removed from Training Opportunities and became part of
the DWI baseline contracted services budget. It is used by
Regional Commissioners to purchase a wide range of
employment and training related initiatives. The remaining
$97m is available for Training Opportunities.
8 This
review is concerned with both the Training Opportunities
scheme funded through Vote: Work and Income, and the Youth
Training scheme funded through Vote: Education. In addition
the approach taken by DWI to employment training assistance
since 1997 will need to be considered as part of the
assessment of the future objectives for Training
Opportunities and Youth Training.
Youth Training
9
Youth Training currently provides targeted training
opportunities for around 13,000 students (over 5,000 at any
one time) aged between 15 and 17 each year. There are about
334 providers of Youth Training. Around 80 percent of
trainees had no qualification prior to entering Youth
Training and 87 percent had never been in full-time
employment. In 2000, 44 percent of Youth Training
participants were women, 48 percent of trainees were Mäori,
and 10 percent of trainees were Pacific peoples.
10
Students undertake study at National Qualifications
Framework (NQF) levels 1 to 3 in generic skills and in a
range of industry areas. Targets for Youth Training are
based on entry to further education or employment. For the
twelve month period to 30 November 2000, two months after
leaving the course 23 percent of students were in to further
education and training courses, and 42 percent were in
employment. While many of the courses provide a vocational
context, they also include considerable generic education
components.
Training Opportunities
11 Training
Opportunities aims to assist long-term unemployed and some
other beneficiaries who also have low levels of
qualifications (no more than two School Certificate subjects
or equivalent. During 2000 there were 21,965 trainees, of
whom 70 percent had no qualification and 50 percent had
never been in full-time employment before entering the
programme. In 1999, 42 percent of trainees were Mäori and
11 percent were Pacific peoples. Women made up 49 percent
of the trainees. There are about 408 providers delivering
at least 1,400 Training Opportunities courses
nation-wide.
12 As for Youth Training, students undertake
study at NQF levels 1 to 3 and targets are based on entry to
further education or employment. In the twelve month period
to 30 November 2000, two months after leaving the programme
50 percent of trainees were in employment and 11 percent
were in further education. There was an average credit
achievement of 23 credits.
Objective of the review
13
Currently the government contributes to meeting the
educational and employment needs of those with significant
histories of unemployment and/or no or low qualifications
through Training Opportunities and Youth Training. A review
is to be undertaken of these interventions, which will focus
on consideration of the key policy issues and the
exploration of the high level operational implications of
those possible policy directions.
The objective is
to:
a undertake a ‘first principles’ review that will
establish the appropriate future objectives for these
programmes, and their contribution to meeting the
educational and employment needs of those people with
significant histories of unemployment and/or no or low
qualifications, and
b in so doing, the review will
examine the effectiveness of current Youth Training and
Training Opportunities programmes in the light of ongoing
changes within the labour market and the education and
training sector, and evaluate the various options for best
meeting those educational and employment needs in the
future.
Scope
14 In examining how Government should
best meet the needs of people with significant histories of
unemployment and/or no or low qualifications, the review
will also give consideration to how these programmes can
better assist:
a in developing the mix of skills training
required to assist people in obtaining sustainable
employment;
b in helping people gain qualifications, and
providing the essential skills for lifelong learning;
c
in developing literacy skills;
d in increasing positive
outcomes for Mäori, Pacific people, youth, people with
disabilities and other people who experience persistent
disadvantage in the community and labour market; and
e
whether the criteria for access to these programmes should
be altered.
15 In addition the review will consider
the broad implications of the proposed future objectives for
the:
a funding, purchasing, contracting models,
accountability, quality assurance, student support, and
administrative arrangements to support the delivery of these
programmes;
b future roles and responsibilities of and
relationships between government agencies, education and
training providers, employers, job seekers and
trainees;
c application of National Qualifications
Framework with regard to such programmes;
d future
programme performance requirements, and the associated
information/data gathering, monitoring, research and
evaluation systems.
Interface with other policy
initiatives
16 The review will be linked with other
policy developments and initiatives to avoid duplication of
effort and inconsistent policy development. In particular,
it will take account of:
a Current policy work, including
the industry training review, adult literacy strategy,
benefit reform, workforce 2010, report of the adult
education and community learning working group, work on the
Secondary Tertiary Alignment Resource (STAR) and Gateway
pilots, and an education and training strategy for 16-19
year olds.
b In addition the review should take account
of work on the development of the National Certificate of
Educational Achievement, on Modern Apprenticeships, on the
development of the voluntary and community sector, on
literacy qualifications development, alternative education
initiatives, work by the Maori adult literacy working group,
and work on a Maori Education Authority.
c Ongoing work
by the Tertiary Education Advisory Commission (TEAC) on the
future strategic direction of the tertiary education system.
d The Hui Taumata Mätauranga recently provided a forum
for Mäori to comment on the aspirations of Mäori in
education, and the review needs to be informed by the work
resulting from the Hui. Key recommendations to Ministers
from the Hui were for increased Mäori authority in
education, and improved Government capability and
responsiveness to Mäori needs and aspirations
e From an
employment perspective there is a need to determine whether
programmes such as Training Opportunities should continue to
sit outside the Cabinet employment guidelines administered
by the Department of Work and Income (DWI), or whether they
should be incorporated within them.
f Cabinet agreed in
1997 to ‘ring fence’ Training Opportunities funding within
Vote: DWI until an evaluation of the effectiveness of
various employment assistance training programmes has been
completed. The premise behind this decision was the desire
in time to review whether Training Opportunities funding
should be further unconstrained within Vote: Department of
Work and Income and in time be integrated more closely
within employment assistance programmes generally. The
approach taken by DWI to employment training assistance
since 1997 will need to be considered as part of the
assessment of the future objectives for Training
Opportunities and Youth Training.
g A general context of
providing more flexibility for DWI Regional Commissioners to
achieve specified employment outcomes within a climate of
rapidly changing labour market conditions. A key objective
has been to ensure plans of action for obtaining employment
for an individual job seeker are more based on individual
needs and aspirations and less on the range of programmes
available to help them. Pilot schemes are being developed
to test outcomes-based funding within Vote: DWI. Such
schemes would establish varying levels of financial
incentive for providers to achieve employment outcomes for
job seekers based on an assessment of how job ready that job
seeker is.
h Te Puni Kökiri’s effectiveness audit of
Training Opportunities and Youth Training will be concluded
and reported on in June 2001, and will include
recommendations on how the programmes could better meet the
needs of Mäori learners.
i The government's sustainable
development goals, which imply the integration of social,
environmental and economic issues, and the critical role of
policies relating to human capability and employment in
meeting these goals.
j A number of related Government
initiatives including the youth development, disability,
positive ageing, Pacific and Mäori capacity building
strategies.
Process and Accountability
17 The review
will be led by a mixed review team of 5 sector experts and 2
senior officials (one from Department of Labour, one from
Ministry of Education). The review team will be accountable
to the Associate Minister of Education (Tertiary Education)
for delivering on the review.
18 This leadership team
will be supported by officials from the Department of Labour
and Ministry of Education. Close consultation will also
occur between the review team and officials from Skill New
Zealand and Department of Work and Income.
19 A
high-level advisory group of stakeholders (including
providers, industry, Mäori and Pacific peoples) will provide
additional formal input into the review process. This
advisory group will advise on process and content at key
stages of the project before the review team reports to
Government.
20 A group of officials from government
departments with an interest in the review will also have
input into the review process.
Deliverables
21 The
Government has directed that the review be concluded in
early 2002, to enable its findings to inform Budget 2002.
The review begins formally in July 2001, with the release of
terms of reference and establishment of the review team to
lead the review.
22 The first phase of the review
includes an environmental scan, a stock take of the existing
operations in New Zealand, a literature review and a review
of overseas systems. It also includes ‘field work’, meeting
with and discussing the issues with stakeholders in a large
urban area and a regional centre. Phase one will conclude
with a paper analysing the key issues being submitted by the
review team to the Minister of Social Services and
Employment and Associate Minister of Education (Tertiary
Education) by 30 September 2001.
23 The second phase of
the review will build on the issues identified as key to
meeting the education and employment needs of those with
no/low qualifications who are also unemployed, and develop
broad options for the future. A paper will be submitted to
the Minister by the review team on the options by 15
November 2001. After consideration by the Minister and
other key Ministers, a consultation document will be
released by 7 December 2001 to provide an opportunity for
public comment. That public comment will need to be
received by 7 February 2002. A final report will then be
submitted to the Minister by the review team by 28 February
2002.
Consultation
24 Stakeholder input is critical to
the success of the review. Several processes will ensure
stakeholders are involved in the review, including the mixed
review team (including sector experts), the high-level
advisory body (made up of stakeholders), wider consultation
with key sector bodies, and through the public consultation
document and consultation meetings.
25 The purpose of
these processes is to exchange information and discuss ideas
with key stakeholders. These stakeholders include employers,
trainees, job seekers, training providers and Mäori and
Pacific peoples/provider groups, youth and people with
disability interest groups.
BRIEF RESUMES OF YOUTH
TRAINING/TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES REVIEW TEAM
MEMBERS
Sally Munro is Executive Director, Munro
Duigan Ltd. She has been involved in policy reviews in the
education, employment and social development sectors. She
has held General Manager positions in both strategic policy
and business operations. As General Manager of New Zealand
Employment Service (1992/6) she was responsible for managing
and leading a national network of more than 70 Employment
Centres, with approximately 1000 staff. Prior to this she
held a range of positions, including Chief Labour Market
Advisor (1990/2), Executive Officer for the Commission for
the Future (19976/8), and Researcher at the University of
Surrey (1981/3). She was an advisor within the Policy
Advisory Group, DPMC (1996/2000)
She is also involved in assisting with the set-up of a film company and business development initiatives for an internet based company focussed on global marketing of NZ stitch designers.
Geoff Woolford is Chief Executive of the National Council of YMCAs. He has extensive experience working with youth at risk including managing a national organisation concerned with improving outcomes for youth, including through providing training programmes. He has amongst other things worked previously as a youth worker. He has been involved with a range of national professional organisations whose objective is related to furthering the aims of youth at risk.
He has been or is a member of a variety national community organisations including the Community sector Round Table, NZ Federation of National Youth Organisations, NZ Association of Private Education Providers, NZ Federation of Voluntary Welfare Organisations and AA Drivers Education Foundation.
Ngapo (Bub) Wehi is founder and has been
leader/tutor with the Te Waka Huia Maori Cultural Club since
1981. The club has been winner of Aotearoa Traditional Maori
Performing Arts Festivals and has represented NZ at South
Pacific Festivals. He was a lecturer in Maori studies and
education at AIT and UNITEC from 1984 to 1996. He is
currently a lecturer at Auckland University in Maori
Studies.
He has a long history of training rangitahi and
has strong tikanga and te reo skills.
Amongst other
things he is or has been a JP; Managing Director, Pounamu
Ventures Ltd and Pounamu Training Systems; Chair, Te Waka
Toi Arts Council and Pounamu Maori Development Authority; a
Member of Tourism Auckland, the Aotearoa Tourism Assoc., the
Chamber of Commerce, and Auckland Maori Competitions
Committee.
Tina Olsen-Ratana is Manager of the Kokiri Marae Keriana Olsen Trust which amongst other matters provides education, training and employment services to at risk Maori. She is a former National co-ordinator for the Aotearoa Maori Providers of Training, Education and Employment (AMPTEE) and contractor to NZQA and ETSA. Since 1999 she has been a Board member of NZQA.
She is a founder of , and national executive spokesperson for, AMPTEE and is on the Board of Trustees for Te Ara Whanui Kura Kaupapa Maori.
Liz Tanielu has provided advice on the delivery of
programmes to Pacific people in the education, health and
employment areas. From 1996 to 2000 she was a senior
adviser with the Community Employment Group leading the
implementation and delivery of community employment
initiatives. Has also been a tutor with the Victoria
University Department of Education (1995/96) and worked as a
programme manager in the State Services Commission
(1991/94). She is currently chair
of the Board of
Trustees at Porirua College.
The Review Team will also include officials from the Department of Labour and the Ministry of Education, and will work in close consultation with Skill New Zealand and the Department of Work and Income.