Excerpted from 20 Dictators Currently Supported by the U.S. by David Swanson, March 19, 2020
A dictator is a single individual who possesses such extreme power over a government that some people refer to it as
“absolute power.” There are degrees of dictatorship, or — if you prefer — individuals who are partially dictators or
somewhat dictatorial. Oppressive governments that restrict liberties, deny participation, and abuse human rights overlap
considerably, but not entirely, with dictatorships. Because there are more studies and rankings of oppressive
governments than of dictatorships, and because the problem is the oppression, not who does it, I’m going to look for a
moment at some lists of oppressive governments, before turning to the subject of the dictators who run many of them.
In 2017, Rich Whitney wrote an article for Truthout.org called “U.S. Provides Military Assistance to 73 Percent of
World’s Dictatorships.”
Whitney was using the word “dictatorships” as a rough approximation of “oppressive governments.” His source for a list
of the oppressive governments of the world was Freedom House. He intentionally chose this U.S.-based and
U.S.-government-funded organization despite the clear U.S.-government bias in some of its decisions. Freedom House has
been widely criticized, not merely for being funded by one government (plus funding from a few allied governments) while
producing rankings of governments, and not merely for slanting its criticism against U.S.-designated enemies and in
favor of U.S.-designated allies, but also for taking U.S. funding to engage in secretive activities in Iran and to
support a chosen candidate in Ukraine. These are all good reasons to look at Freedom House’s list of the nations that it
labels “not free.” This is as nearly as possible the United States government’s own view of other countries, even as it
includes very restrained criticism of the United States’ own domestic policies. A list from Freedom House can be
augmented, and is below, with the U.S. State Department’s own description of each country’s human rights abuses.
Freedom House ranks nations as “free,” “partly free,” and “not free.” These rankings are supposedly based on civil
liberties and political rights within a country, with apparently no consideration of a country’s impact on the rest of
the world. That is to say, a country could be spreading freedom across the globe and score very low, or be spreading
oppression around the globe and score very high, based purely on its domestic policies.
Freedom House does not, however, limit itself to dictatorships. Some of the factors it considers involve the legitimacy
and power of a national leader, but if a government fully controlled by a large body severely oppresses the public, then
that government ought to be labeled “Not Free” by Freedom House despite not being a dictatorship in the sense of being
dominated by a single person.
Freedom House deems the following 50 countries (taking from Freedom House’s list only countries and not territories) to
be “not free”: Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Belarus, Brunei, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Central
African Republic, Chad, China, Democratic Republic of Congo (Kinshasa), Republic of Congo (Brazzaville), Cuba, Djibouti,
Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Iran, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Laos, Libya, Mauritania,
Nicaragua, North Korea, Oman, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan,
Thailand, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen.
The U.S. government allows, arranges for, or in some cases even provides the funding for, U.S. weapons sales to 41 of
these countries. That’s 82 percent. To produce this figure, I have looked at U.S. weapons sales between 2010 and 2019 as
documented by either the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Arms Trade Database, or by the U.S. military
in a document titled “Foreign Military Sales, Foreign Military Construction Sales And Other Security Cooperation
Historical Facts: As of September 30, 2017.” Here are the 41: Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Brunei,
Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, China, Democratic Republic of Congo (Kinshasa), Republic of
Congo (Brazzaville), Djibouti, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Eswatini (formerly Swaziland), Ethiopia, Gabon, Iraq,
Kazakhstan, Libya, Mauritania, Nicaragua, Oman, Qatar, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan, Thailand, Turkey,
Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Yemen.
Remember, this is a list of nations that an organization funded by the U.S. government designates “not free” but to
which the United States is shipping deadly weapons. And this is 82% of the “not free” nations, which hardly looks like a
case of a few “bad apples.” On the contrary, it almost looks like a consistent policy. One is more inclined to look for
an explanation of why the 82% is not 100% than why it’s not 0%. In fact, of the nine “not free” nations to which the
United States is not shipping weapons, the majority of them (Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela) are nations
commonly designated as enemies by the U.S. government, offered as justifications for budget increases by the Pentagon,
demonized by the U.S. media, and targeted with significant sanctions (and in some cases attempted coups and threats of
war). These countries’ status as designated enemies also, in the view of some critics of Freedom House, has a lot to do
with how some of them got onto the list of “not free” rather than “partly free” nations.
Beyond selling and giving weapons to oppressive governments, the U.S. government also shares with them advanced weapons
technology. This includes such extreme examples as the CIA giving nuclear bomb plans to Iran, the Trump Administration
seeking to share nuclear technology with Saudi Arabia, and the U.S. military basing nuclear weapons in Turkey even as
Turkey fights against U.S.-backed fighters in Syria and threatens to close NATO bases, as well as spreading drone
technology around the world.
Now, let’s take the list of 50 oppressive governments and check which ones the United States government provides
military training to. There are varying levels of such support, ranging from teaching a single course for four students
to providing numerous courses for thousands of trainees. The United States provides military training of one sort or
another to 44 out of 50, or 88 percent. I base this on finding such trainings listed in either 2017 or 2018 in one or
both of these sources: The U.S. State Department’s Foreign Military Training Report: Fiscal Years 2017 and 2018: Joint
Report to Congress Volumes I and II, and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)’s Congressional
Budget Justification: FOREIGN ASSISTANCE: SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES: Fiscal Year 2018. Here are the 44: Afghanistan, Algeria,
Angola, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Belarus, Brunei, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, China,
Democratic Republic of Congo (Kinshasa), Republic of Congo (Brazzaville), Djibouti, Egypt, Eswatini (formerly
Swaziland), Ethiopia, Gabon, Iran, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Laos, Libya, Mauritania, Nicaragua, Oman, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda,
Saudi Arabia, Somalia, South Sudan, Tajikistan, Thailand, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Arab Emirates,
Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen.
Once again, this list does not seem like a few statistical oddities, but more like an established policy. The handful of
exceptions again include Cuba and North Korea for obvious reasons. The reason they include Syria in this case and not in
the case of weapons sales is because of the dates I restricted this search to. The United States went from arming and
working with the Syrian government to trying to overthrow it (by arming and working with rebels in Syria rather than
with the government).
I suspect that many in the United States did not know that in 2019, these many years after September 11, 2001, the U.S.
military was training Saudi fighters to fly airplanes in Florida until one of them made the news by shooting up a
classroom.
In addition, the history of U.S.-provided military training to foreign soldiers, through facilities like the School of
the Americas (renamed Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation) provides an established pattern of not just
supporting oppressive governments, but of helping to bring them into being through coups.
Now let’s take one more run through the list of 50 oppressive governments, because in addition to selling (or giving)
them weapons and training them, the U.S. government also provides funding directly to foreign militaries. Of the 50
oppressive governments, as listed by Freedom House, 32 receive “foreign military financing” or other funding for
military activities from the U.S. government, with — it’s extremely safe to say — less outrage in the U.S. media or from
U.S. tax payers than we hear over providing food to people in the United States who are hungry. I base this list on the
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)’s Congressional Budget Justification: FOREIGN ASSISTANCE:
SUMMARY TABLES: Fiscal Year 2017, and Congressional Budget Justification: FOREIGN ASSISTANCE: SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES:
Fiscal Year 2018. Here are the 33: Afghanistan, Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Belarus, Cambodia, Central African
Republic, China, Democratic Republic of Congo (Kinshasa), Djibouti, Egypt, Eswatini (formerly Swaziland), Ethiopia,
Iraq, Kazakhstan, Laos, Libya, Mauritania, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan, Thailand,
Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Yemen.
Out of 50 oppressive governments, the United States militarily supports in at least one of the three ways discussed
above 48 of them or 96 percent, all but the tiny designated enemies of Cuba and North Korea. With some of them, the U.S.
military goes further than we have yet discussed in its relations and support for these oppressive regimes. In these
countries, the United States bases a significant number of its own troops (i.e. over 100): Afghanistan, Bahrain, Cuba*,
Egypt, Iraq, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Thailand, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. Technically Cuba is in this
list, but it is a different case from the others. The United States keeps troops in Cuba in defiance of Cuban opposition
and decidedly not in support of the Cuban government. Of course, Iraq has now asked the U.S. troops to leave, putting it
in a position closer to Cuba’s.
In some cases, the military engagement goes further. The U.S. military is fighting a war in partnership with Saudi
Arabia against the people of Yemen, and fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in support of oppressive governments (as
described by Freedom House and by the U.S. State Department) that were created by U.S.-led wars. Governments created by
foreign occupations are oppressive and corrupt and tend to have an interest in keeping wars going in order to keep arms
and dollars and troops flowing their way from the United States. Yet, the Iraqi government has asked the U.S. military
to get out, and talks of a possible peace agreement in Afghanistan continue to percolate.
At the same time, the United States enacts Trump’s Muslim ban, restricting travel from numerous nations that the United
States arms, including Eritrea, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. One wouldn’t want any dangerously armed people
traveling.
Another source for a list of dictatorships is the CIA-funded Political Instability Task Force. As of 2018, this group
identified 21 nations as autocracies, 23 as closed anocracies (anocracies being mixtures of autocracy and democracy),
and the rest as open anocracies, democracies, or full democracies. The 21 autocracies are: Azerbaijan, Bahrain,
Bangladesh, Belarus, China, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Laos, North Korea, Oman, Qatar, Saudi
Arabia, Eswatini (formerly Swaziland), Syria, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vietnam. This adds
Bangladesh and Kuwait to the list of nations we are looking at. The U.S. military supports those two and all of the
others listed here, except North Korea.
So we’re looking at a list of 50 oppressive governments. Is it the right list? Should some nations be removed and others
added? And which are dictatorships, and who are the dictators?
Continued in 20 Dictators Currently Supported by the U.S.
--
David Swanson is an author, activist, journalist, and radio host. He is executive director of WorldBeyondWar.org and campaign
coordinator for RootsAction.org. Swanson's books include War Is A Lie. He blogs at DavidSwanson.org and WarIsACrime.org. He hosts Talk Nation Radio. He is a 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 Nobel Peace Prize Nominee.
Follow him on Twitter: @davidcnswanson and FaceBook.
Help support DavidSwanson.org, WarIsACrime.org, and TalkNationRadio.org by clicking here:
http://davidswanson.org/donate.
Sign up for these emails at https://actionnetwork.org/forms/articles-from-david-swanson.