Te Papa expert made redundant gets offered new role at museum
Te Papa has backtracked on its decision to make a fish expert redundant.
Photo: RNZ / Richard Tindiller
A source within Te Papa has confirmed that Andrew Stewart has now been offered an assistant curator role, after he
lodged an appeal against his redundancy.
Mr Stewart was set to be made redundant alongside his colleague
, world-renowned mollusc expert Dr Bruce Marshall, as part of a restructure
of the museum's natural history team.
News of the restructure caused a backlash among the science community
both in New Zealand, and overseas, when it was revealed last year.
University of Otago palaeogenetics lab director Nic Rawlence said the restructure should have never happened.
"It's basically a massive backdown and defeat for Te Papa ... they've finally admitted that the grounds they used to get
rid of Andrew Stewart did not stand-up to scrutiny, and they should be congratulated on the fact that they're finally
doing what's right, but at the same time it should have never actually come to this in the first place," Dr Rawlence
"I personally think that Bruce and Andrew were one of the most productive and well-respected scientists within the
Andrew Stewart holds a daggertooth from the Te Papa
fish collection. Photo: RNZ / Alison Ballance Marine expert Dr Steve O'Shea, who is famous for his work with Te Papa's colossal squid, says Mr Stewart's job offer was
a partial win considering Dr Marshall's position.
"I am of course still concerned that Bruce hasn't been offered a position, that they are still advertising Bruce's
position and that that new position, applications for that close tomorrow so, we have called for a moratorium on
restructuring and staff redundancies and appointments at Te Papa - that moratorium we don't have yet."
"So Andrew has secured his position, Bruce [has] not, so it's a partial win for the small guys."
Dr O'Shea wanted there to an independent audit of Te Papa, so those behind the restructure can be held to account.
"I think that audit should look at the people behind the proposed redundancies and restructuring, it should look at the
policies that have been used that have enabled this restructure to occur because legally Te Papa didn't have a leg to
"[We're looking for] these people to be identified and for these people to be removed from the positions that they've
been promoted to that they're clearly incompetent to do."
A Te Papa spokesperson said that they would not be commenting further, as the process was confidential and it was
"working to find the best possible outcome."
Previously, Te Papa director of strategy Dean Peterson defended the restructure, saying the museum was making changes to
keep up with the fast-changing areas of biodiversity and biosecurity.
"We're doing that by changing some of the roles on the team. We're not actually changing the size," Dr Peterson said.
"It is about expertise and it's also about relevance to the science community and to the government agencies that are
dealing with all of this work.
"We really need some new people in there. We need to have a career path for these individuals and that's why we're
putting together the structure we have."
Mr Stewart has been approached for comment.