The ‘Last Martyr’: Who Killed Kamal Al-Assar?
Ramzy Baroud
When I learned of the death of Kamal al-Assar, a few years ago, I was baffled. He was only in his 40s. I remember him in
his prime, a young rebel, leading the neighborhood youth, armed with rocks and slingshots, in a hopeless battle against
the Israeli army. Understandably, we lost, but we won something far more valuable than a military victory. We reclaimed
our identity.
At every anniversary of the First Palestinian Intifada, a popular uprising that placed the Palestinian people firmly on
the map of world consciousness, I think of all the friends and neighbors I have lost, and those I have left behind. The
image of Ra’ed Mu’anis, in particular, haunts me. When an Israeli sniper’s bullet plunged into his throat, he ran across
the neighborhood to find help before he collapsed at the graffiti-washed walls of my house.
“Freedom. Dignity. Revolution,” was written in large red letters on the wall, a pronouncement signed by the Popular
Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
Only later I learned that Kamal was the one who carried Ra’ed out of the firing zone. But it was too late. Ra’ed, a
skinny and feeble teenager, with a distinct black mark on his forehead had bled alone at the steps of my home. When he
was buried, hundreds of refugees descended on the Martyrs Graveyard. They carried Palestinian flags and chanted for the
Intifada and the long-coveted freedom. Ra’ed’s mother was too weakened by her grief to join the procession. His father
tried to stay strong, but wept uncontrollably instead.
Kamal was revitalized by the Intifada. When the uprising broke out, he emerged from his own solitude. Life made sense
once again.
For him, as for me and many of our generation, the Intifada was not a political event. It was an act of personal - as
much as collective - liberation: the ability to articulate who we were at a time when all seemed lost. The Palestinian
Liberation Organization (PLO) languished in Tunisia after being forced to leave Lebanon in 1982. Arab governments seemed to have lost interest in Palestine altogether. Israel emerged triumphant and
invincible.
And we – those living under protracted military occupation – felt completely abandoned.
When, on December 8, 1987, thousands took to the streets of Jabaliya Refugee Camp, the Gaza Strip’s largest and poorest camp, the timing and the location of their uprising was most
fitting, rational and necessary. Earlier on that day, an Israeli truck had run over a row of cars carrying Palestinian
laborers, killing four young men. For Jabaliya, as with the rest of Palestine, it was the last straw.
Responding to the chants and pleas of the Jabaliya mourners, the refugees in my refugee camp – Nuseirat - marched to the
Israeli military barracks, known as the ‘tents’, where hundreds of soldiers had tormented my camp’s residents for years.
In the morning of December 9, thousands of Nuseirat youth took to the streets and vowed to avenge the innocent blood of
the Jabaliya victims of the previous day. They swung large flags made of silky fabric that swayed beautifully in Gaza’s salty air and, as the momentum grew and they became intoxicated by their own collective chants, they marched
to the ‘tents’ where the soldiers were uneasily perched on the tops of watchtowers, hiding behind their binoculars and
automatic machine guns.
Within minutes, a war had started and a third generation of refugee-camp-born fellahin peasants stood fearlessly against
a well-equipped army that was visibly gripped by fear and confusion. The soldiers wounded many that day and several
children were killed.
Kamal was on the frontlines. He waved the largest flag, chanting the loudest, threw rocks the furthest and incessantly
urged young men not to retreat.
Kamal hated school as well as his teachers. To him they seemed so docile, adhering to the rules of the occupier which
decreed that Palestinians not teach their own history, so that the fellahin were denied even the right to remember who
they were or where they came from. The Intifada was the paradigm shift that offered an alternative - however temporary,
however chaotic - to the methodical humiliation of life under occupation.
Within hours, Kamal felt liberated. He was no longer tucked away in a dark room reading the works of Marx and Gramsci.
He was in the streets of Nuseirat fashioning his own utopia.
The Intifada was that transformational period that saved a generation from being entirely lost, and Palestine from being
forgotten. It offered a new world, that of solidarity, camaraderie and wild youth who needed no one to speak on their
behalf.
Within weeks of bloody clashes in which hundreds of youth fell dead or wounded, the nature of the Intifada became
clearer. On one hand, it was a popular struggle of civil disobedience, mass protests, commercial and labor strikes, refusal to pay taxes and so on. On the other hand, militant cells of
refugee youth were beginning to organize and leave their mark, as well.
The militancy of the Intifada did not become apparent until later, when the repression by the Israeli government grew
more violent. Under the banner of the ‘Iron Fist’ campaign, a new Israeli stratagem was devised, that of the ‘broken bones’ policy. Once captured, youth had their hands and legs broken by soldiers in a systematic and heartless manner. In my
neighborhood, children with casts and crutches seemed to outnumber those without.
Kamal was eventually detained from his home. He attempted to escape but the entire neighborhood was teeming with
soldiers, who arrived at night as they always do. They commenced the torturous rite in his living room, as his mother –
the resilient, Tamam – shoved her body between him and the ruthless men.
When Kamal regained consciousness, he found himself in a small cell, with thick, unwashed walls that felt cold and
foreign. He spent most of his prison time in the torture chamber. His survival was itself nothing less than a miracle.
When the Oslo Accords were signed in 1993, officially ending the Intifada, Kamal’s generation felt betrayed. Nothing
good came out of that ‘peace’, except that a few rich Palestinians grew even richer.
Kamal died a few years ago. I learned that his revolution never ceased. He became a teacher, laboring to reconstruct the
history of his people at a local Gaza university. His mother, now an old refugee in Nuseirat is still heartbroken over
her son’s death. She told me that Kamal’s wounds and physical ailments from prison never healed.
Kamal was a martyr, she told me. Perhaps the last martyr in an uprising that was not meant to liberate land, but
liberate people from the idea that they were meant to exist as perpetual victims; and it did.
- Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and editor of Palestine Chronicle. His forthcoming book is ‘The Last Earth: A Palestinian Story’ (Pluto Press, London). Baroud has a Ph.D. in Palestine Studies from the University of Exeter and is a Non-Resident
Scholar at Orfalea Center for Global and International Studies, University of California Santa Barbara. His website is www.ramzybaroud.net.
ends