Israel’s manipulation of UK politics: time for zero-tolerance
But don’t rely on the foreign secretary… or the prime minister… or the speaker to take action. And especially not the
Standards Committee.
Both the Foreign Office and Boris Johnson, the UK’s foreign secretary, have declared the Shai Masot affair “closed”
after Masot, an employee of the Israeli embassy and probably a Mossad asset, plotted with gullible British MPs and
political hangers-on to “take down” senior government figures, including Johnson’s deputy, Alan Duncan. “The UK has a
strong relationship with Israel and we consider the matter closed,” they announced. The Speaker of the House of Commons,
John Bercow, who is Jewish, has also declined to investigate.
Sorry, Boris. It isn’t closed – hell no. It’s just opening and it’ll run and run. You and your fellow stooges can be
sure of it.
According to some reports, Masot served in the Israeli navy in Palestinian waters off Gaza. Given the many atrocities
committed by Israel’s gunboats against Gaza’s fishermen, and children playing on Gaza’s beach, and even peaceful unarmed
humanitarian vessels bringing relief to the sick and starving there, he may well be on a wanted list for questioning
about war crimes. Masot’s damning comments were captured and revealed in an undercover investigation by Aljazeera and not, as one might have hoped, by Britain’s own beloved press barons.
Masot’s hostile conniving was going on under the eye of a recently arrived ambassador, the loathsome Mark Regev, ace propagandist, mastermind of the Israeli lie machine and personal spokesman for the Zionist regime’s chief thug,
Binyamiin Netanyahu.
Emily Thornberry, the Labour Party’s shadow foreign secretary, called Masot’s activities “extremely disturbing” and has
demanded a probe into the potential extent of political “interference” in the United Kingdom. There are calls for Regev
to be packed off back to Tel Aviv.
A petition demanding a public inquiry can be found here.
Are British parliamentarians at last waking up? Are those who wave the flag of a nasty, murderous foreign military power
about to feel the heat from an increasingly furious public? They should be very afraid.
Watch George Galloway’s devastating summing-up.
Nothing new
The realisation that we are in the grip of great evil has been slow in coming. Nine years ago 20 senior professionals
wrote to the Committee on Standards in Public Life about the undue influence of the Israel lobby at the heart of British
government and their deep concern about the appalling conditions forced on the civilian population in the occupied
territories, particularly Gaza, by the Israeli blockade and called-for sanctions to be imposed by Britain and the
European Union.
A letter had earlier been delivered to the Foreign Office minister then responsible for the Middle East, Kim Howells,
suggesting that Britain consider suspending the EU-Israel Association Agreement. The rules provide for this sanction if
Israel’s conduct towards its neighbours falls short of what is required under the UN Charter and other obligations.
Howells replied:
We consider that the Association Agreement is a key tool for the EU to both enhance cooperation with Israel but also to
raise any concerns. We do not support suspension of that agreement, which would limit how we could put our viewpoint
across to the Israeli government.
When the EU demanded an end to the emergency in Gaza and the military occupation of the West Bank, Israel responded with
an even tighter lockdown, so another letter was sent to Howells. He replied:
The UK… has strong relationships with Israel on a number of fronts… We do not consider it would be in the best interests
of the UK, or the European Union, to end this relationship.
Howells was a former chairman of Labour Friends of Israel (LFI). His opposition shadow at the time was a member of
Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI).
The minister was then asked to explain what “viewpoint” Her Majesty’s Government had put to the Israeli government
regarding the medieval-style siege of Gaza and the collective punishment inflicted on its already impoverished civilians
in flagrant breach of the UN Charter and every conceivable code of conduct. What action had he and his department taken
to alleviate the suffering in this former British mandate? What was the status of the coastal waters off Gaza? How could
Israel maintain a sea blockade lawfully and deny Gazan fishermen their livelihood?
And how did continuing the association agreement in these cruel circumstances “enhance cooperation” with Israel?
No answers to these questions were ever received.
So the 20 signatories reminded the Standards Committee how the lobby group, Friends of Israel, had embedded itself in
the British political establishment with the stated purpose of promoting Israel’s interests in our Parliament and bend
British policy.
British MPs eating out of the Israeli government’s hand
It was put to the committee that MPs are surely not at liberty to act for a foreign military power at the expense of our
own national interests, or to let foreign influence cloud their judgement. Such conduct breached the second of the Seven Principles of Public Life, namely Integrity – “Holders of public office should not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or
organisations that might seek to influence them in the performance of their official duties.”
The various Friends of Israel organisations had gone to great lengths to influence those in power. A good many of them,
it seemed, reached their high positions with Friends of Israel help. The network acted as a sort of parliamentary
freemasonry. The political director of Conservative Friends of Israel claimed that with over 2,000 members and
registered supporters alongside 80 per cent of the Conservative MPs, CFI was the largest affiliated group in the party.
Its website stated that the CFI
strives to support the Conservative Party at all available opportunities. In the run up to the 2005 General Election…
CFI supported candidates up and down the country. As candidates are now being continuously selected for target seats,
CFI has developed a special programme of weekly briefings, events with speakers and a chance to participate in
delegations to Israel. CFI encourages all members to help campaign for parliamentary candidates and also for local
council, London and European elections.
It also had a “Fast Track” group for Conservative parliamentary candidates fighting target marginal seats at the next
election. The political director himself was seeking election to Parliament. If successful where would his loyalty lie?
Senior Conservatives tried to justify these activities by insisting that Israel was “a force for good in the world” and
“in the battle for the values that we stand for, for democracy against theocracy, for democratic liberal values against
repression – Israel’s enemies are our enemies and this is a battle in which we all stand together”.
The danger of inappropriate “friendships” with foreign regimes had become blazingly obvious a few days earlier when
Tzipi Livni, Israel’s foreign minister, was reported to have twice asked David Miliband, our foreign secretary, to scrap
the law that authorised magistrates to issue arrest warrants for suspected war criminals who set foot in the UK, she
being a particularly blood-soaked example. Avi Dichter, a former director of the Shin Bet spy service and involved in
the Shehadeh assassination in which 14 Palestianian civilians, including children, were killed by an Israeli air strike,
had to cancel a trip to London for fear of being arrested.
Doron Almog, a former Israeli general, also involved in the Shehadeh affair, narrowly avoided arrest when he landed at
Heathrow in 2005. Israel wished the UK to change its laws to protect alleged war criminals. So, we did so just to oblige
them, in the name of “enhanced cooperation”, as Howells might have put it.
The Standards Committee was also told bluntly:
It is especially disconcerting to discover that at least two members of your committee, which is pledged to uphold the
Principles of Public Life, are Friends of Israel [one the president of Conservative Friends of Israel and the other a
member of Labour Friends of Israel]… Given that Israel’s deep penetration of our political system apparently prevents
Britain from taking a principled stand on Middle East matters, including the violations of Palestinian human rights, we
invite your committee – minus those with an interest – to uphold the Principles of Public Life and consider the
activities of the Friends of Israel as a matter for urgent investigation.
But the Standards Committee refused to look into it. The chairman’s reply, sent in a note from a member of his office
staff, said: “I regret that the Committee on Standards in Public Life has no remit to help you in this matter.”
So, the public’s watchdog – the Standards Committee – which was formed specifically to uphold those Seven Principles,
wasn’t playing ball. Its published remit called on it
to examine current concerns about standards of conduct of all holders of public office, including arrangements relating
to financial and commercial activities and make recommendations as to any changes in present arrangements which might be
required to ensure the highest standards of propriety in public life.
Wasn’t this the kind of plain English even dyed-in-the-wool bureaucrats like the committee’s chairman could understand?
Apparently not. He added:
This Committee commented on lobbying in their first report in 1995 and re-addressed the issue, including the changes
instigated by their first report, in a review in 2001. The committee has no plans to review this area again in the near
future.
The angry 20 pointed out there was nothing in the 1995 report relating to MPs and legislators representing the interests
of foreign countries within Parliament or placing themselves under the influence of a foreign country’s political lobby.
Nor could they find any mention of it in the 2001 report. They asked for chapter and verse. No reply.
And there the matter has rested for nine years.
Tarnished watchdog
Fast-forward to the present day and we find it’s now the Anglo-Israel Association (AIA) casting a shadow over the
Standards Committee. “The Association’s primary purpose is to promote wider and better understanding of Israel in the
UK; to encourage exchanges between both countries at every level and generally to support activities which foster good
will between British and Israeli citizens,” says the website. But its programme is skewed mainly towards “educating”
Britons, including our clergy, about Israel.
The honorary president of the AIA is the ambassador of Israel himself. The chairman of the AIA’s Executive Committee is
none other than Lord Bew, also chair of the Committee on Standards in Public Life. And its council includes the Earl of
Balfour – the fifth earl, that is – related of course to the first earl, that nincompoop Arthur Balfour whose infamous Declaration in 1917 paved the way for the shameful handover of the Palestinians’ homeland – and Christianity’s homeland – to
Zionist Jews. “What we have done, by concessions not to the Jewish people but to a Zionist extreme section,” warned Lord
Sydenham at the time, “is to start a running sore in the East, and no-one can tell how far that sore will extend.”
The centenary of Balfour’s Declaration will be joyously celebrated this year by Israel’s many Westminster stooges
including Theresa May if her sucking-up speech to the Israel lobby last month is anything to go by.
So there’s a lot of weeding-out to do.
Those disgruntled 20 could easily become 2 million if the BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) movement, the PSC (Palestine Solidarity Campaign), the unions and other activist groups got together.
The sinister machinations of Masot and Regev have presented them an open goal. And we have Aljazeera to thank for the
brilliant exposé where our own security services failed.
ends