Gordon Campbell on refugees, the flag and Bo Diddley
Gordon Campbell on refugees, the flag and Bo Diddley
There’s a simple statistical reason why New Zealand should increase its refugee intake. Our UN quota has remained static – or fallen slightly – over the past 30 years. Over the same period, both our economy and our population has grown substantially – which means the burden imposed on New Zealand by this static number of refugees has steadily fallen in relative terms over the past several decades. It also means that if New Zealand’s capacity to support an expansion of its UN quota intake is currently a problem – which it apparently is – then this should be taken as an indication of the systematic neglect of refugee needs by a series of National and Labour governments.
Currently, the main driver of the refugee tide into Europe is the war in Syria, where the Assad regime is steadily losing its battle for survival against Islamic State and other fundamentalist Islamic forces. Governments in Europe and elsewhere have been able to slow down the military advance of IS, but the refugee exodus from the region is only likely to increase, for the foreseeable. New Zealand has to be part of the international response. Yet until now, Prime Minister John Key has put this country in the same despicable camp as the Australia of Tony Abbott and the Britain of David Cameron. Like them, we’ve been content to put up the shutters and to refuse any substantial help to the Europeans in their time of need. As pointed out in this column yesterday, this is hardly the kind of response we like to honour on Anzac Day. Meanwhile, Europe is splintering between compassion and hostility towards the refugees.
What can a small island nation do, when its government offers only a token response – at best– to an overwhelming humanitarian crisis ? Well, people can mount their own protests in order to spur their deadshit government to do more. That’s what has happened in Iceland when the country’s government said it would take in only 50 refugees.
The ordinary people of Iceland made their feelings clear:
Ten thousand Icelanders have offered to welcome Syrian refugees into their homes, as part of a Facebook campaign launched by a prominent author after the government said it would take in only a handful.
After the Icelandic government announced last month that it would only accept 50 humanitarian refugees from Syria, Bryndis Bjorgvinsdottir encouraged fellow citizens to speak out in favour of those in need of asylum. In the space of 24 hours, 10,000 Icelanders – the country’s population is 300,000 – took to Facebook to offer up their homes and urge their government to do more.
"I'm a single mother with a 6-year-old son... We can take a child in need. I'm a teacher and would teach the child to speak, read and write Icelandic and adjust to Icelandic society. We have clothes, a bed, toys and everything a child needs. I would of course pay for the airplane ticket," wrote Hekla Stefansdottir in a post.
Lets see: 10,000 offers of asylum in an Icelandic population of 300,000. In a population the same size as New Zealand, that would translate to 148,500, which would be considerably more than our current UN quota intake of 750 refugees.
Flag It
And a nation yawned in boredom – and bowed their heads down instead to the Hypnoflag.
Yep, the four semi-final flag contenders chosen by the panel could hardly be less inspirational. On the other hand, incompetence of the selection panel has been truly awe-inspiring. (Did it really not matter to them that two of the contenders are the same design with different colours? Obviously not.) Besides, several of these designs will pose problems of (a) the black or (b) the white components bleeding into their surrounds when they’re put on a black jersey, or on a white page. Since this exercise began and seems likely to end with putting a rugby logo on our flag, that should be considered relevant.
The blurring of our national identity with
rugby reached its logical conclusion this week, when the All
Black team for the Rugby World Cup was announced at
Parliament. Here’s the quote by Key on why he felt
that was appropriate: “The reason why they wanted to
do it and the reason why its appropriate is that Parliament
is the House of Representatives. It represents every New
Zealander, and actually the All Blacks I think as I said in
my remarks, are admired by every New Zealander. So I think
its appropriate. Its what they wanted….” Just for
the record, some of us don’t admire the All Blacks.
Some of us even feel repelled by the extensive investment by some of them in the ( notoriously
underpaid) aged-care sector. Dan Carter and Richie
McCaw and other name rugby players have together taken a
stake of about 10 per cent in the “boutique” Park Lane
Retirement Village, located a few steps from the new AMI
Stadium. Stage one of the $80 million Park Lane Retirement
Village in Christchurch was opened yesterday by Prime
Minister John Key, at a gathering which included Carter and
fellow investors All Blacks Andy Ellis and Corey
Flynn. Carter said he had invested in seven
retirement villages, including complexes in Blenheim, Nelson
and Christchurch, drawn in by Ben Hurst, the son of 1970s
All Black Ian Hurst, who worked in the sector. Former All
Black Greg Somerville was another one of the early investors
in the retirement sector. Other current or former
All Blacks sharing in the 10 per cent stake in Park Lane
include Kieran Read, Leon MacDonald, Mark Robinson, Aaron
Mauger, and former Crusader and now Scottish international
Sean Maitland. This flag process is something a
country does only every hundred years or so. For no
particular reason – other than John Key’s political need
for a distraction - we’ve spent a ton of taxpayer money
trying to find a better option than the current flag, and
have comprehensively failed to do so. Lets cut our losses,
and save what we can of that $26 million due to be wasted
between now and next March. That money would go a long way
to paying for food and warm home insulation for families in
poverty. It could even pay for the re-settlement needs of
the refugee intake. With his usual acumen, here’s Bo
Diddley expressing what most of us felt when we saw the
final list of contenders chosen…