'The Destruction of the World Trade Center:
Why the Official Account of 911 Cannot Be True' – and
watch these videos, featuring Prof Dr Niels Harrit and architect Richard Gage For evidence
indicating an Israeli role, see the book 'Solving 9-11: The
Deception That Changed the World' reviewed here .
Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
Apart from 911,
however, there are many other well-known historical
incidents in which a thorough analysis of the evidence
points to a different explanation to the official one that
is now widely believed. See, for example, the explanation of
James Douglass for the assassination of US President Kennedy
in 'JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and
Why It Matters'.
Moreover, irrespective of your
beliefs in relation to historically notable events, there is
an endless sequence of other points, from the trivial to the
profound, about which you are being systematically misled.
'There is no cure for cancer', we are told. And yet Gerson Therapy
has been curing cancer patients for nearly 100
years!
But my intention in this article is not to send you
off researching a multitude of historical incidents or even
to point out where and why we are all being misled. Instead,
I want to ask you three questions: Are you scared to make
your own judgment (irrespective of the number of others,
including experts, who make a similar judgment)? Are you
scared to be labelled a 'conspiracy theorist' if you believe
something contrary to the official (that is, the elite)
narrative? And why?
When we are young, we are all exposed
to a wide range of people, each of whom has a limited amount
of knowledge, as well as beliefs and an opinion, about a
wide range of issues. Whether these adults are our parents,
teachers, religious figures or simply other people with whom
we interact, most of them are unconsciously engaged in
trying to persuade us to see things from their perspective.
This happens because they are scared when people do not
agree with them and so they tend to spend time with people
whose perspective they share.
If some of the people with
whom we interact are particularly scared when people
disagree with them, then they will tend to be more
forthright in seeking our 'agreement' (especially, perhaps,
in particular contexts). And they will do this in a variety
of ways, subtle and otherwise. In many contexts, for
example, people will attempt to impose 'agreement' as a way
of avoiding feeling their own fear (such as the fear of
being wrong). For instance, if a parent wants their child to
attend school, they are unlikely to listen well to a child
explain why they do not want to do so, either today or
permanently.
So, if the parent is scared to listen to a
child, and the child becomes scared by the parental failure
to listen, the child might simply learn to do what they are
told because this is less frightening than standing up to
their parent. This will certainly be the case if early
experiences of being assertive are met with violence
(euphemistically called 'punishment').
Similarly, if a
teacher is scared to listen to a child, and the child is
frightened by the teacher's failure to listen, the child
might simply learn to do what they are told because this is
less frightening than confronting the teacher.
Before
long, as you can see, the child will become afraid to
challenge any authority figure under any circumstance and
the belief, opinion or command of the parent, teacher or
other authority figure will become 'the (unchallengable)
truth', even if there are some (vague unconscious)
misgivings (which are easily suppressed). For a full
explanation of the 'invisible' violence which causes this,
see and 'Fearless Psychology and Fearful Psychology:
Principles and Practice'
So here are the key
questions. Did your parents and teachers encourage you to
question and seek answers for yourself (rather than simply
believe what was presented by them)? Did they encourage you
to challenge their authority (when you felt you had
legitimate cause)? Or did they punish you for
questioning/disobeying them? What do you do with your
children?
And how much time do you spend investigating,
for yourself, the major issues of our day – in relation to
wars, the environment and a variety of social justice and
health issues, for example – and then courageously
standing up for the viewpoint that you develop based on the
evidence that you have considered and evaluated
personally?
If you are already inclined to question and
challenge authority, you might want to sign the online
pledge of 'The People's Charter to Create a Nonviolent
World'
In essence, a key factor in the elite strategy
to maintain social control is to endlessly disparage, and
try to frighten people out of considering for themselves,
the evidence on any given issue. So next time you are
reading, watching or listening to a presentation of the
'official' view, ask yourself 'What is the truth here?' and,
when you judge it really matters, check out the evidence for
yourself.
************* Biodata: Robert J. Burrowes has a lifetime
commitment to understanding and ending human violence. He
has done extensive research since 1966 in an effort to
understand why human beings are violent and has been a
nonviolent activist since 1981. He is the author of 'Why
Violence?' His email address is flametree@riseup.net and his website is
at http://robertjburrowes.wordpress.com
© Scoop Media
Using Scoop for work?
Scoop is free for personal use, but you’ll need a licence for work use. This is part of our Ethical Paywall and how we fund Scoop. Join today with plans starting from less than $3 per week, plus gain access to exclusive Pro features.
Join Pro Individual
Find out more