Duty to Warn:
The Forgotten Christmas Truce of 1914, and the Unlearned Lessons That Could Have Prevented the Century of War 1914 -
2014
by Gary G. Kohls, MD
December 17, 2014
It was exactly 100 years ago this month when the Christmas Truce of 1914 occurred, when Christian soldiers on both sides
of the infamous No Man’s Land of the Western Front, recognized their common humanity, dropped their guns and fraternized
with the so-called enemies that they had been ordered to kill without mercy the day before. As mentioned in last week’s
column, the truth of that remarkable event has since been effectively covered up by state and military authorities (and
the embedded journalists at the time) because they were angered (and embarrassed) by the breakdown of military
discipline.
In the annals of war, such “mutinies” are now unheard of. The generals and (as well as the saber-rattling,
chest-thumping politicians and war profiteers back home) rapidly developed strategies to prevent such behavior from
happening again.
Christmas Eve of 1914 was only 5 months into World War I, and the cold, weary, homesick soldiers found themselves not
heroes, as expected, but rather miserable, frightened and disillusioned wretches living in rat- and louse-infested
trenches. Most of them had dreamed heroic dreams when they had signed up to kill and die for King and Country a few
months earlier, and hey had been fully expecting to be home for the holidays.
Lower echelon officers on both sides of No Man’s Land, who were suffering right along with the troops, allowed a lull in
the war - just for Christmas Eve. Then they allowed the troops to sing Christmas hymns, and many of the not-yet hardened
soldiers started to recognize the humanity of the demonized “other” that had been fingered as sub-humans deserving of
death.
And so the merciful spirit of the season came upon them; and they disobeyed orders that forbade fraternizing with the
enemy by laying down their weapons and mingling with them in the area between the trenches.
Unknown to the higher echelon commanding officers - who were enjoying good food and drink in their warm bunkers out of
the range of the artillery barrages and machine gun bursts - the grunts on either side of the battle line suddenly
sensed the stupidity of killing someone that was just like them and who had never done them any harm.
Many of the men that experienced the moment knew that something deeply profound had happened: a spiritual experience of
mutual respect and love that epitomized their mutual Christian upbringing – and they refused to fight and kill when the
war was ordered to re-start.
Some soldiers were punished for their disobedience and many of them had to be replaced with fresh troops that had been
in the reserve trenches the day before (corporal Adolf Hitler was among the ones who did not experience the front line
fraternization.)
The Christmas Truce of 1914 had come close to ending the futile and ultimately suicidal war that destroyed 4 empires and
an entire generation of young men that had been bamboozled into joining up.
The truce had occurred at various places up and down the triple parallel lines of trenches that stretched through France
for 600 miles from Belgium to Switzerland. The vast majority of the soldier that experienced the unauthorized truce did
not survive the war. Many of them had just experienced a bloody battle that had killed tens of thousands of troops on
either side, with essentially no territory being gained by either side, and they now knew that they were in for a long
war of attrition. They would not be home for Christmas.
The Prelude to “The War to End All Wars”
World War I was referred to in the pre-WWII history books as “The Great War” or, naively and rather laughably, “The War
to End all Wars”. In the centuries before, warfare as a means of settling disputes between nations was often regarded as
a noble undertaking that only involved professional soldiers. Wars in those days were just larger examples of the common
(and equally barbaric) practice of engaging in “honorable” duels (sometimes to the death) when a rival disrespected
another with something as simple as an offhand insult.
European military officers came from the landed aristocracy. The careers of the officer class were so familial that they
almost seemed hereditary. Part of the attraction of being a military officer in Europe was the unquestioning respect
that military officers demanded, not to mention the impressive uniforms and the medals and ribbons that were worn on
them.
Military veterans in Europe were universally honored as heroes, whether dead or alive, no matter if they had
participated in war crimes or acts of torture, rape, murder or pillage. Military shrines, statues, cemeteries and
holidays for “the fallen” are regarded as normal all over the continent. The military service of European veterans seems
to have been regarded as worthy of praise – no questions asked - even if the veteran himself felt unworthy.
What most prospective enlistees or conscripts knew about war was what their fathers and the uber-patriotic war
literature had selectively told them and what they had learned from the censored, palatable version of war that they
read about in their school history books.
Most of the enlistees were looking forward to escaping the boredom of their day-to-day existence and experiencing up
close the exhilaration of playing real war games. These unaware, wet behind the ears young men hadn’t been told about
the dehumanizing verbal and physical abuse that was to be meted out by their drill sergeants in basic training or the
beatings they would suffer later for disobedience or disrespect.
Unbeknownst to the naive grunts on the front line, the ruling elites had ulterior motives. (The kings, queens, emperors,
princes, nobles, kibitzers, veterans, the bankers that financed the wars, the weapons makers and assorted other captains
of industry all felt that they would somehow profit from the war.) These war profiteers, too old or influential to go to
war themselves, knew how much money could be made in wars, and, in addition, they had the assurance that they would be
far from the killing fields.
French and British schoolchildren had been indoctrinated for generations in the belief that the German emperor, Kaiser
Wilhelm, was evil incarnate and therefore, if war were to come, the German soldier who took orders from him was
deserving of death. German schoolchildren were taught the same about the French and the English rulers and killing
soldiers. And each of the leaders, sensing that their honor was at stake, seemed to be spoiling for a fight.
The Powder Keg: Alsace-Lorraine
Most of the civilians living in Europe had very few direct memories of war. The horrors of war had been erased from
their memories but, to the professional warrior class, war was a game that could advance their careers and pay grade.
Times were relatively good for many Europeans, but the military class was more than willing to get into a good war.
Peace in Europe had actually existed since Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo a century earlier, with the exception of
the relatively short Franco-Prussian War of 1870. The 1871 Treaty of Frankfurt that ended that war (with France
surrendering to the Germans) transferred the disputed territory of French-occupied Alsace-Lorraine back to Germany.
Alsace-Lorraine was a rich industrial region located between France and Germany that had alternately been claimed over
the centuries by either Germany or France - depending on which nation had lost the last war.
Before WWI erupted, Alsace-Lorraine was a powder keg ready to be ignited. The two historical enemies “knew” that
Alsace-Lorraine was rightfully theirs, and they were willing to kill for it or die trying – not to mention earning the
right to spell its largest city either Strassburg or Strasbourg.
Authoritarian, Militarized Europe
Most European governments were not democracies. They were authoritarian, paternalistic and anti-democratic, and there
were enormous and often widening gaps between the haves (the 1%) and the have-nots of the lower 99%. Attempts at
instituting socialism or representative democracy had been brutally put down by the conservative ruling elite’s obedient
police and security forces.
Cruelty in child-rearing (and basic training) was the norm in Europe, which contributed heavily to the generational
obedience to authority figures, whether parents, school teachers, clergypersons, drill sergeants, generals, corporations
or political leaders. Most Europeans therefore accepted the rule of the hereditary kings, emperors, princes, nobles and
military generals. And, as is also true of non-democratic institutions, everybody was expected to be obedient to those
above them in the chain of command and to demand obedience from those below. Unconditional obedience to authority makes
it easy to develop efficient killing soldiers for war departments and dictators.
The Divine Right of Kings
For centuries, most European leaders felt that it was their divine right to colonize other nations and enslave the
inhabitants - by any means necessary - especially if those inhabitants were of another color or religion.. Any territory
that had valuable natural resources to steal or workers to exploit, no matter where in the world it was, was considered
a legitimate target especially if it was militarily weaker than the invader and as long as the citizens of their home
nation were uninformed, self-satisfied, arrogant, uber-patriotic, distracted and/or apathetic.
The method of choice for the subjugation of a people targeted for colonization – a la Christopher Columbus - was always
the use of overwhelming military force followed by years of brutal occupation and the afore-mentioned systematic looting
of natural resources or labor. Killing, torturing, intimidating, imprisoning, silencing, exiling or otherwise
“disappearing” the ethical opposition is the norm for empires. The intellectuals, altruists, prophets, poets, artists,
singers, songwriters, investigative journalists and other truth-tellers or resistance movement activists had to be
silenced.
In the century prior to 1914, all European empires had standing armies and military bases both at home and abroad.
Nations often negotiate treaties with potential allies that promise that, if one nation was attacked by another
treaty-signatory, each would come to the other’s aid. This reality resulted in a very complex web of treaties that was
instrumental in starting World War I.
Living by the Sword/Dying by the Sword
The totally avoidable military madness of WWI resulted in the destruction of four empires and the deaths of upwards of
20 million people, most of whom were young naive patriotic men who had, in retrospect, stupidly welcomed the chance to
prove their manhood by engaging in what they thought would be exciting war games. All sides had somehow trusted the
ridiculous assertion that everybody would be home by Christmas - welcomed home as conquering heroes! That myth was
propagated by the press and foolishly believed by those of military age.
When Archduke Ferdinand, the heir-apparent to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian empire, was assassinated in Sarajevo on
June 28, 1914, the century of relative European peace rapidly unraveled in a series of errors of judgment, bureaucratic
snafus, failures of communication and refusals to risk dishonor by “turning the other cheek” or even negotiating in good
faith. Within days of the assassination, the saber-rattling heads of European states began mobilizing for war.
Within a month the dominos fell, with each nation honorably living up to their treaty obligations by declaring war on
one another. And on August 4, 1914, World War I began in earnest when Austria tipped over the first domino by shelling
innocent civilian populations in little Serbia, an action that prompted the declarations of war by Russia, Germany,
Britain and France.
The chest-pounding of the deluded, arrogant, out-of-touch leadership on all sides resulted in a war fever that had
unstoppable momentum. Their indoctrinated testosterone-laden rookie soldiers soon found themselves, as always, to be the
elite’s dutiful trigger-pullers; and an entire generation of young men was wasted in the trenches of the Western Front,
either killed or wounded.
Most of those that survived bodily were rendered insane, criminally psychopathic or otherwise psychologically and/or
spiritually disabled for the rest of their lives. No one, especially the glory- and power-seeking militarists at the
top, had foreseen the coming holocaust or the intolerable stalemates in a new kind of warfare that relied on shovels,
machine guns, artillery and poison gas. Heroic cavalry charges with swords drawn were suddenly obsolete. Everyone,
especially the out-of-touch generals and the clergymen who were supposed to be in charge of the nation’s souls, had been
blinded by the propaganda lie that war was something other than satanic.
As tantalizing as is the story of the Christmas Truce, it is also a reminder of what could have happened if there had
been less obedience to authority and more organized opposition to senseless war in the families, schools and churches.
If the well-meaning Christian boys from England, France, Germany, Russia, Austria, et al (who wound up helplessly
suffering in that demonic war) had been, in their childhoods, thoroughly exposed to the ethical teachings of their Jesus
in the Sermon on the Mount, they might have had the capacity to refuse the invitation to kill their co-religionists on
the other side of the battle lines. In fact, if they had really absorbed the message of their all-merciful God, they
wouldn’t have been able to slaughter anybody at all.
That futile and suicidal war could have ended before it really got up a head of steam if the righteous mutiny had been
more widespread, better organized and well-supported by the chaplains at the front and the heavily propagandized,
flag-waving civilians back home.
Tragically, the anti-Christic propaganda machine prevailed, thanks in part to the censorship of the obedient press (that
still persists today) by refusing to do good investigative journalism by sanitizing the horrors of war.
What turned out to be a mutual mass slaughter of a degree never before seen in the history of warfare could have ended
100 years ago this Christmas if every soldier had experienced the peace that was present in the trenches and
courageously laid down their weapons forever.
One of the lessons of the Christmas Truce story is summarized in the concluding verse of John McCutcheon’s famous song
about the event, “Christmas in the Trenches”:
“My name is Francis Tolliver, in Liverpool I dwell.
Each Christmas come since World War I - I've learned its lessons well:
That the ones who call the shots won't be among the dead and lame
And on each end of the rifle we're the same.”
Check out the video of McCutcheon singing his song at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJi41RWaTCs and, for a good pictorial history of the reality of WWI’s trench warfare, check out: www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTXhZ4uR6rs
The official trailer of “Joyeux Noel” is available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXcseNVZGRM
*************
Gary G. Kohls is a retired physician from Duluth, MN. He has been actively involved in peace, justice and nonviolence
issues for much of his adult life and, since his retirement, has written a weekly column for the Duluth Reader. His
columns mostly deal with the dangers of American fascism, corporatism, militarism, racism and other movements that
threaten American democracy.