The Anti-Empire Report #123
By William Blum
December 3rd, 2013
“If nature were a bank, they would have already rescued it.” – Eduardo Galeano
What do you think of this as an argument to use when speaking to those who don’t accept the idea that extreme weather
phenomena are man-made?
Well, we can proceed in one of two ways:
1. We can do our best to limit the greenhouse effect by curtailing greenhouse gas emissions (carbon dioxide,
methane, and nitrous oxide) into the atmosphere, and if it turns out that these emissions were not in fact the cause of
all the extreme weather phenomena, then we’ve wasted a lot of time, effort and money (although other benefits to the
ecosystem would still accrue).
2. We can do nothing at all to curtail the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, and if it turns out
that these emissions were in fact the cause of all the extreme weather phenomena (not simply extreme, but getting
downright freaky), then we’ve lost the earth and life as we know it.
So, are you a gambler?
Whatever we do on a purely personal level to try and curtail greenhouse gas emissions cannot of course compare to what
corporations could do; but it’s inevitable that the process will impinge upon the bottom line of one corporation or
another, who can be relied upon to put optimization of profit before societal good; corporate “personhood” before human
personhood. This is a barrier faced by any environmentalist or social movement, and is the reason why I don’t subscribe
to the frequently-voiced idea that “Left vs. Right” is an obsolete concept; that we’re all together in a common movement
against corporate and government abuse regardless of where we fall on the ideological spectrum.
It’s only the Left that maintains as a bedrock principle: People before Profit, which can serve as a very concise
definition of socialism, an ideology anathema to the Right and libertarians, who fervently believe, against all
evidence, in the rationality of a free market. I personally favor the idea of a centralized, planned economy.
Holy Lenin, Batman! This guy’s a Damn Commie!
Is it the terminology that bothers you? Because Americans are raised to be dedicated anti-communists and
anti-socialists, and to equate a “planned economy” with the worst excesses of Stalinism? Okay, forget the scary labels;
let’s describe it as people sitting down and discussing what the most serious problems facing society are; and which
institutions and forces in the society have the best access, experience, and resources to offer a solution to those
problems. So, the idea is to enable these institutions and forces to deal with the problems in a highly organized and
efficient manner. All this is usually called “planning”, and if the organization of it all generally stems from the
government it can be called “centralized”. The alternative to this is called either anarchy or free enterprise.
I don’t place much weight on the idea of “libertarian socialism”. That to me is an oxymoron. The key questions to be
considered are: Who will make the decisions on a daily basis to run the society? For whose benefit will those decisions
be made. It’s easy to speak of “economic democracy” that comes from “the people”, and is “locally controlled”, not by
the government. But is every town and village going to manufacture automobiles, trains and airplanes? Will every city of
any size have an airport? Will each one oversee its own food and drug inspections? Maintain all the roads passing
through? Protect the environment within the city boundary only? Such questions are obviously without limit. I’m just
suggesting that we shouldn’t have stars in our eyes about local control or be paranoid about central planning.
“We are all ready to be savage in some cause. The difference between a good man and a bad one is the choice of the
cause.” – William James (1842-1910)
So, George W. Bush is now a painter. He tells his art teacher that “there’s a Rembrandt trapped inside this body”. Ah,
so Georgie is more than just a painter. He’s an artiste.
And we all know that artistes are very special people. They’re never to be confused with mass murderers, war criminals, merciless torturers or
inveterate liars. Neither are they ever to be accused of dullness of wit or incoherence of thought.
Artistes are not the only special people. Devout people are also special: Josef Stalin studied for the priesthood. Osama bin
Laden prayed five times a day.
And animal lovers: Herman Goering, while his Luftwaffe rained death upon Europe, kept a sign in his office that read: “He who tortures animals wounds the feelings of the
German people.” Adolf Hitler was also an animal lover and had long periods of being a vegetarian and anti-smoking.
Charles Manson was a staunch anti-vivisectionist.
And cultured people: This fact Elie Wiesel called the greatest discovery of the war: that Adolf Eichmann was cultured,
read deeply, played the violin. Mussolini also played the violin. Some Nazi concentration camp commanders listened to
Mozart to drown out the cries of the inmates.
Former Bosnian Serb politician Radovan Karadzic, on trial now before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former
Yugoslavia, charged with war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity, was a psychiatrist, specializing in
depression; a practitioner of alternative medicine; published a book of poetry and books for children.
Al Qaeda and other suicide bombers are genuinely and sincerely convinced that they are doing the right thing. That
doesn’t make them less evil; in fact it makes them more terrifying, since they force us to face the scary reality of a
world in which sincerity and morality do not necessarily have anything to do with each other.
Getting your history from Hollywood
Imagine a documentary film about the Holocaust which makes no mention of Nazi Germany.
Imagine a documentary film about the 1965-66 slaughter of as many as a million “communists” in Indonesia which makes no
mention of the key role in the killing played by the United States.
But there’s no need to imagine it. It’s been made, and was released this past summer. It’s called “The Act of Killing”
and makes no mention of the American role. Two articles in the Washington Post about the film made no such mention either. The Indonesian massacre, along with the jailing without trial of about a
million others and the widespread use of torture and rape, ranks as one of the great crimes of the twentieth century and
is certainly well known amongst those with at least a modest interest in modern history.
Here’s an email I sent to the Washington Post writer who reviewed the film:
“The fact that you can write about this historical event and not mention a word about the US government role is a sad
commentary on your intellect and social conscience. If the film itself omits any serious mention of the US role, that is
a condemnation of the filmmaker, and of you for not pointing this out. So the ignorance and brainwashing of the American
people about their country’s foreign policy (i.e., holocaust) continues decade after decade, thanks to media people like
Mr. Oppenheimer [one of the filmmakers] and yourself.”
The Post reviewer, rather than being offended by my intemperate language, was actually taken with what I said and she asked me
to send her an article outlining the US role in Indonesia, which she would try to get published in the Post as an op-ed. I did so and she wrote me that she very much appreciated what I had sent her. But – as I was pretty sure
would happen – the Post did not print what I wrote. So this incident may have had the sole saving grace of enlightening a Washington Post writer about the journalistic standards and politics of her own newspaper.
And now, just out, we have the film “Long Walk to Freedom” based on Nelson Mandela’s 1994 autobiography of the same
name. The heroic Mandela spent close to 28 years in prison at the hands of the apartheid South African government. His
arrest and imprisonment were the direct result of a CIA operation. But the film makes no mention of the role played by
the CIA or any other agency of the United States.
In fairness to the makers of the film, Mandela himself, in his book, declined to accuse the CIA for his imprisonment,
writing: “The story has never been confirmed and I have never seen any reliable evidence as to the truth of it.”
Well, Mr. Mandela and the filmmaker should read what I wrote and documented on the subject some years after Mandela’s
book came out, in my own book: Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower (2000). It’s not quite a “smoking gun”, but I think it convinces almost all readers that what happened in South Africa
in 1962 was another of the CIA operations we’ve all come to know and love. And almost all my sources were available to
Mandela at the time he wrote his autobiography. There has been speculation about what finally led to Mandela’s release
from prison; perhaps a deal was made concerning his post-prison behavior.
From a purely educational point of view, seeing films such as the two discussed here may well be worse than not exposing
your mind at all to any pop culture treatment of American history or foreign policy.
Getting your history from the American daily press
During the US federal government shutdown in October over a budgetary dispute,Washington Post columnist Max Fisher wondered if there had ever been anything like this in another country. He decided that “there
actually is one foreign precedent: Australia did this once. In 1975, the Australian government shut down because the
legislature had failed to fund it, deadlocked by a budgetary squabble. It looked a lot like the U.S. shutdown of today,
or the 17 previous U.S. shutdowns.”
Except for what Fisher fails to tell us: that it strongly appears that the CIA used the occasion to force a regime
change in Australia, whereby the Governor General, John Kerr – a man who had been intimately involved with CIA fronts
for a number of years – discharged Edward Gough Whitlam, the democratically-elected prime minister whose various
policies had been a thorn in the side of the United States, and the CIA in particular.
I must again cite my own writing, for the story of the CIA coup in Australia – as far as I know – is not described in
any kind of detail anywhere other than in my book Killing Hope: U.S. Military and C.I.A. Interventions Since World War II (2004).
Americans are living in an Orwellian police state. Either that, or the greatest democracy ever.
There are those in the United States and Germany these days who insist that the National Security Agency is no match for
the East German Ministry for State Security, or Stasi, which, during the Cold War, employed an estimated 190,000
part-time secret informants, and an additional 90,000 officers full time, in a spying operation that permeated both East
and West Germany. Since the end of the Cold War, revelations from the Stasi files have led to thousands of collaborators
being chased from public life. Even now, new accusations of a Stasi association can hound politicians and celebrities in
All that of course stems from an era before almost all information and secrets became electronic. It was largely labor
intensive. In the digital age, the NSA has very little need for individuals to spy on their friends, acquaintances, and
co-workers. (In any event, the FBI takes care of that department very well.)
Can we ever expect that NSA employees will suffer public disgrace as numerous Stasi employees and informants have? No
more than war criminals Bush and Cheney have been punished in any way. Only those who have exposed NSA crimes have been
punished, like Edward Snowden and several other whistleblowers.