Aotearoa: Socialist solutions needed to fix housing crisis
Aotearoa/NZ: Socialist solutions needed to address housing crisis
November 9, 2013
http://fightback.org.nz/2013/11/09/aotearoanz-socialist-solutions-needed-to-address-housing-crisis/
The following article by CWI reporters in Aotearoa/New Zealand first appeared in the Australian magazine The Socialist.
New Zealand is in the midst of a housing crisis. This crisis was created by decades of neo-liberal policy including the deregulation of housing consent and planning, the sell-off of state housing stock, and the failure to close tax loop-holes. These loop-holes have enabled a thin layer of people to create wealth out of property speculation while others struggle to meet rental payments in substandard housing.
The absence of a capital gains tax has led many investors to see property as a means to make easy profits. This has exacerbated inequality with a smaller number of people owning an increasing number of property assets to the exclusion of others.
An OECD 2011 report on New Zealand noted that: “Wealth is concentrated to a greater extent in property compared to most other OECD countries…Supply rigidities and tax incentives that bias savings decisions towards property investment have amplified the increase in house prices, widening wealth inequalities in the form of larger homes for those who can afford them, but deteriorating affordability for the rest of the population.”
The gaps in the tax system have helped create a boom in the property sector. This has left many young families unable to purchase a home. Between 1991 and 2012 home ownership fell to a 50 year low and is forecast to continue falling.
Since 1991 the government’s main intervention in the housing market has been the provision of the Accommodation Supplement to low income earners. This payment effectively operates as a landlord-subsidy ensuring landlords continue to gain a profit from their property investments. At the same time it sends a message to employers that they do not have to pay a living wage. Since 1991, the growth of this subsidy has been enormous and yet it does nothing to treat the underlying reasons for why housing is unaffordable for so many families.
The
privatisation of state housing
In 1991, with the
incoming National government, New Zealand saw the “mother
of all budgets” which included the selling-off of state
housing and the introduction of market rents for state
housing.
While the policy of market rents was eventually reversed with the introduction of Income Rent Subsidies, New Zealand continues to live with the legacy of a severely depleted state housing stock. State housing is now seen as only an option for the poorest families – only those classed as “high priority” are placed on waiting lists.
According to the Housing New Zealand Annual Report 2011/2012: “Under the new criteria, only new applicants with high-priority needs are eligible for state rentals, with moderate and low-priority applicants no longer being placed on the waiting list.”
The government has meanwhile earmarked $46.8 million during 2015/16 and 2016/17 for Housing New Zealand to provide additional rent subsidies for those tenants forced to move into market rentals.
The most recent legislation to pass on state housing does nothing to address the housing short fall. Instead it allows private organisations to bid for tenders to provide social housing. This will only make access to affordable housing more difficult. The false idea being pushed is that the ‘market’ is the best mechanism to deliver social services. The truth is it’s an attempt to open new areas of the economy for exploitation.
Recently Housing New Zealand has also been through a process of “reconfiguring its portfolio”. This is code for selling off properties which have increased in value. In Auckland this has occurred most controversially in Glenn Innes under the “The Tamaki Transformation Project”.
Under the plan, Housing New Zealand has been evicting tenants and selling properties which have increased in value. State assets are not immune to the imperative that they deliver a profit, or as Housing New Zealand put it, an “acceptable return to the Crown”.
The Tamaki Redevelopment Company has been formed as a joint Council/Government agency to oversee the development of the remaining properties into one of Auckland’s largest housing projects. Under the plan, houses will be built under public-private partnerships, with a mix of state and market housing. The purpose of the Tamaki Redevelopment Company is to oversee the transfer of assets away from Housing New Zealand and to implement the management of them by private organisations. Essentially this is a stage of further privatising state housing.
Market rents
While the government is
intent on pushing more families out of state housing and
into market rentals, current laws provide little security
for renters. There are very few provisions to address tenure
security and housing that meets health standards and the
differing mobility requirements of tenants.
The Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) notes that despite the well-documented relationship between health problems and housing quality, there has been complete neglect from the government on ensuring dwellings meet basic standards.
While the government has committed an additional $102 million over the next four years on housing, none of it will go towards improving rental conditions. Most of this expenditure is needed to cover the increased demand for the Income Rent Subsidy and Accommodation Supplement.
Auckland housing issues even more
acute
In Auckland there is an estimated shortfall of
15,000 dwellings and this is expected to worsen. The
Auckland City Council is acting at the behest of property
developers and is pushing for deregulated zoning and size
restrictions so that developers can build more dwellings on
less land. While there are increased rules around some
visual aspects, such as how developments will fit with the
heritage values of an area, they do not address the most
serious problems around low-quality unsafe housing.
The Salvation Army’s 2012 report on Auckland housing is damning, not just on the lack of government response to the crisis, but it also points to the governments role in facilitating the crisis through bad legislation that has benefited property speculators and developers above families forced to live in increasingly unaffordable and unhealthy housing.
The report said: “We have developed, supported and nurtured systems that have sustained and even expanded inequality. These systems have allowed some Aucklanders to grow rich through property speculation and have allowed some Aucklanders to develop poor-quality housing that not only leaks, but is ugly and unliveable. These systems have allowed some Aucklanders to occupy larger and larger houses, while other Aucklanders live in more crowded houses and in sheds, garages and caravans. These systems have biased our tax system so that not only are house prices excessively inflated but now higher and higher public subsidies are required for modest-income households to be able to afford any housing”
Socialists fight for immediate reforms to provide some relief to people suffering from housing stress and to address the root causes of the crisis.
We call for:
• Housing to be provided to all as a basic
human right
• A massive public works program to build
thousands of new state homes to wipe out the waiting lists
and create much needed construction jobs
• Tax reform
that will eliminate the ability of speculators to make
profits out of housing
• The introduction of strict
regulation for rental properties that requires all housing
to meet standards on liveability, mobility, health and
safety
• A cap on private rents to limit landlords
profiteering
A lasting solution
The
commodification of housing is a perversity. We should not
have a situation where some profit and others struggle to
find a decent affordable place to live. The only way to
change this once and for all is to change the profit driven
system that creates this scenario. A socialist system based
on public ownership, democratic control and sustainable
planning would prioritise people’s needs and ensure that
the basics of life, like a roof over your head, were
provided to
all.
ENDS