Israeli Response to Rouhani Betrays Its Own Intransigence
September 22, 2013
Israel’s mean-spirited response to Iran’s olive branch actually illuminates its own aggressive posture. Along comes
Hassan Rouhani, the new Iranian president, and instead of applauding his initiatives to meet with President Obama and
resolve outstanding issues by diplomacy, Israeli Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz says “there is no more time for
negotiations.” And although Rouhani only just took office last month, his appeal for negotiations was dismissed by
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu as a deceitful “charm offensive.”
“One must not be fooled by the Iranian president’s fraudulent words,” Netanyahu said. “The Iranians are spinning in the
media so that the centrifuges can keep on spinning.” Yet, as Andrea Germanos of Common Dreams neatly summarized, “Iran has repeatedly said its nuclear program is for civilian purposes, and while the U.S. and
Israel have repeatedly referred to Iran’s ‘nuclear weapons program,’ there is no proof that exists.”
Consequently, we have the spectacle of Israel, atop a veritable mountain of perhaps 300 nuclear weapons that it will not
allow the International Atomic Energy Agency inspect, calling for the U.S. to escalate its threats against Iran, which
has exactly zero nuclear weapons. We also have UN member Israel threatening, and urging the U.S. to threaten, another UN
member with military force, a violation of the UN Charter.
Yet, Rouhani appears to be actively demonstrating he means what he says, and UN members are looking forward to his
speech the day after tomorrow. In yesterday’s editorial, The New York Times noted Iran’s “recent flurry of remarkable gestures: Iran’s leadership has sent Rosh Hashana greetings to Jews worldwide
via Twitter, released political prisoners, exchanged letters through the Swiss with President Obama, praised
‘flexibility’ in negotiations and transferred responsibility for nuclear negotiations from conservatives in the military
to the Foreign Ministry.”
Israel’s response shows how far it has strayed from its own philosophy of non-violence, which dates back to the
Jerusalem Talmud of the third century A.D. As Wikipedia notes, under Jewish doctrine, “the requirement is that one
always seek a just peace before waging war.” Not so today!
While President Obama maintains Iran’s unproven nuclear military buildup may threaten Israel, the fact is that, compared
to Israel and America, Iran is a peace-loving society that has not attacked another nation in hundreds of years. Since
WWII alone, the U.S. has struck militarily, or overthrown by force and violence, some 50 nations. One of them, of
course, was our unprovoked CIA overthrow of Iran in 1953. And where the U.S. spends about $700 billion a year on the
military and Israel spends $14 billion, Iran spends $9 billion, yet the U.S. and Israel, projecting their own instincts,
claim it is a military menace. A bit more objectively, Professor “Juan” Cole, the University of Michigan historian and
Middle East authority, points out that Iran has not attacked another nation in modern times.
The U.S. today has emerged as the world’s most dangerous country. What other nation is making drone strikes across the
Middle East, Africa and even in the Philippines, killing “terror suspects” and civilians alike without a pretense of
legality? (President Obama openly says he takes responsibility for these atrocities as if this admission alone does not
qualify him as a war criminal.) It is the U.S., that has surrounded Iran with military bases, not the other way around,
just as it is the U.S. that operates more than a thousand bases globally while Iran has none. It is the U.S. that has
spread its atomic arsenal around the globe. It is the U.S. that used radioactive ammunition in its wars against Iraq,
just as it used Agent Orange in its war against Viet Nam. And, according to recently declassified CIA files, the U.S.
even played a role in Iraq’s chemical attacks on Iran during their bloody war.
The American public has a vital stake in the outcome of any peace negotiations that may follow President Rouhani’s UN
speech Tuesday. Reducing tensions in the Middle East could deprive the Pentagon of the rationale for its horrendous
spending and allow taxpayers to divert their money to their needed domestic agenda. Instead of senseless killing, it
might even save some lives for a change. Fancy that!
*************
Sherwood Ross is an American public relations consultant who formerly reported for the Chicago Daily News and Reuters.