Army Center for Substance Abuse Programs: Bankrupt at the Top, Ignoring Soldier Needs
August 26, 2013
“Products are supposed to be based on valid scientific data. Strong Choices and the Universal Prevention Model are based
on perceptions and opinions.”
In March of 2012 an article was published outlining some of the allegations of fraud, waste and abuse within the US Army’s Center for Substance Abuse Programs (ACSAP)
. Since the publication of that piece, sources say, only minor changes were made: one employee resigned, another was
Indeed, sources now report that the ACSAP program has become a lucrative for-profit business operating within the US
Federal government (ostensibly a non-profit operation). ACSAP management
there, Leslie McFarling and Rhonda Earl, appear to be heading a Tammany Hall operation whose focus is securing positions for close comrades and relatives, not the health of the US military
personnel and, of course, their families/communities who ultimately must care for the active or returning soldier.
If the allegations are correct, then the fault for this ultimately rests with uniformed US Army commanders. They are
responsible for overseeing private contractors and/or revolving door personnel whose loyalty is to profit, not military
personnel or the US Constitution.
Sources claim that ACSAP leadership (McFarling and Earl) are “unethical and corrupt.” They say that personnel brought
into the program are unqualified. Moreover, they claim that the products and services that are offered to US military
personnel are of low quality and, hence, do not “meet the needs of the military personnel.”
At least $17 million dollars (US) was awarded to a contractor known as Windwalker. Sources claim that Windwalker has
delivered “nothing” to ACSAP that truly serves the needs of US military personnel. Instead, the $17 million was used by
McFarling to hire friends-in-need. Meanwhile work orders within the contract were not satisfactorily completed and yet
the ACSAP contractors still received unearned payments. Contractors also were rewarded with exclusive ownership of
products paid for by taxpayers. These products can be used to rake in more cash from, say, state and local organizations
not savvy enough to get past the smoke and mirrors of a marketing campaign.
MyPRIME, for example, would end up costing the US Army/US Federal government nearly $6 million dollars. That product is
owned by Prevention Research Institute (PRI) who happens to be closely linked to the ACSAP director. The US Army/US
Federal government has to pay PRI a license fee to run a program that was paid for by taxpayers.
ASCAP leadership appears to be allergic to performing research that involves “measure of effectiveness” for the products
and services aimed at US military personnel. The reason for that, according to sources, is that the output from
Windwalker and PRI is not measurable. One source said that the “US Army has been using the MyPrime product for nearly a
decade and no one knows if it is meeting the needs of the population or not.”
It’s all about personal gain and profit, not the suffering personnel or the families.
Inspect an Installation for Vacation
ACSAP apparently has been a funding source for the director’s pet programs that have dubious motives.
Sources indicate that the “That Guy Campaign” is one such program. “’That Guy’ glamorizes drinking…most installations
don’t support the campaign...there is no data to support its effectiveness…It is offensive and degrading…”
Allegations have surfaced that travel to inspect installations for compliance with US Army Regulation 600-85 was done,
in part, to coincide with staff vacations. Sources claim that the ACSAP deputy director took her family to Hawaii during
one installation inspection. When the installation there failed to pass inspection, ACSAP did not follow up to correct
deficiencies found. Instead, the Inspection as Vacation Program continued on.
According to sources, more contractors are being hired than are actually needed. Performance work statements (PWS) are
being generated just to bring on board relatives and friends. “The husband of one Department of the Army civilian was
hired…the fact is that contractor’s like this have nothing to do because most of the work on the PWS is made up to
justify a contract.”
In the end, said a source, ACSAP is more like a promotional organization for Windwalker and PRI. ACSAP is now viewed as
a bankrupt organization that does not serve the needs of its clients: the men and women of the US Army and their
John Stanton is a Virginia based writer.