The Tragic Truth about the State of Israel
By Luke Hiken
November 20, 2012
In the 1940s and 50s, I was raised on the North Shore of Chicago, in a suburb named Glencoe. The town was at least 95%
Jewish, and everyone knew who the 3 black families were, knew the handful of Christians and “others” who resided near
us. We understood that we comprised one of the wealthiest, fanciest Jewish ghettos in the United States, and perhaps the
world. The great majority of us went to temple at the North Shore Congregation Israel, and donated $5.00 a shot for
stickers to purchase “trees” to plant in the new State of Israel. We were going to transform the desert into a promised
land and help the oppressed Jews of Europe to create a homeland where pogroms, ghettos and the Holocaust were a thing of
the past. For literally decades, Zionists had perpetuated the myth that the territory that would become the State of
Israel was “a land without a people, for a people without a land.” How noble and just it all seemed.
If anyone would have asked us why we were planting trees in Israel, when the Holy Land was already covered with Olive
trees planted by Arab families for more than 5 centuries, we would have accused them of rank anti-semitism. If someone
had suggested that we were purchasing guns, and missiles, instead of agricultural tools, we would have fought them on
the spot. Yet history judges us harshly and we now have a reckoning to deal with.
I represented men and women on death row in California for over 25 years. All of the defendants on death row, without
exception, were brutalized as young children, either by their parents, or their community. The great majority of
prisoners were victims of brutality, and they responded to the society that brutalized them by killing in return.
One would have expected that those who were brutalized as children would have recognized how horrible the experience was
and rejected such behavior when it was their turn to have authority over others. But that is simply not so. Humans,
unfortunately, by and large, grow up to perpetrate the same atrocities that were perpetrated upon them against those
they are close to. While this phenomenon is not universal, it is so common as to be the expectation for law enforcement
and the society at large. Children of convicts are expected to become criminals when they grow up, and the society does
everything in its power to ensure that that expectation is met. Young black children in this country have to be saints
to stay out of reformatories and prisons. One out of three black people in the United States are in prison or on parole.
So, too, do we watch this phenomenon being tragically repeated in the State of Israel. One would expect that a people
who had been subjected to the atrocities of World War II, to the Holocaust, to the discrimination and slaughter
perpetrated against the Jews, would be the first nation on earth to oppose a similar oppression against others. Yet, the
sad reality is that the racism and violence perpetrated against Palestinians in the State of Israel is outlandish and
inexcusable.
Gaza is nothing short of a concentration camp. Children are starving there and Israel will kill any individual or group
that attempts to bring food or water into that land. Israel is the last country on the face of the earth that has dared
to impose a formal state of apartheid against an indigenous population. Israeli checkpoints are the precise duplicates
of what the Nazi checkpoints at the borders of the ghettos looked like in 1938 Germany. The excuses and rationalizations
used by Israel to perpetuate this oppression against the Palestinian people are precisely those used by the Nazis:
Palestinians pose a threat to the security of the nation; they will steal jobs and security from the rightful people of
the nation; they are untrustworthy, and owe no allegiance to the nation. The parallels are terrifying.
That this should be the situation in 2012 is so pathetic as to be comical in an historical context. The anti-semitism of
the prevailing nations of World War II, the United States and Great Britain was so profound as to obviate the
possibility that Jews would be permitted to immigrate or seek sanctuary in either of those victorious countries. The
Christian majorities of those countries so hated the Jews that allowing them to seek sanctuary in either country was out
of the question.
Instead, anti-semitic nations decided to give the Jews who survived the Holocaust land that belonged to the
Palestinians. Kill two birds with one stone. Keep Jews out of the U.S. and Great Britain, and give them the land of a
bunch of Muslims that, according to the U.S. and Great Britain, were little more than savages. Certainly, the Western
powers could control any opposition the local population might put up to prevent the Jews from entering the new state of
Israel. It would be a walk in the park for these countries to disenfranchise the Palestinian people, who had lived on
the land for centuries. The fact that Jews had lived in Palestine for centuries without undergoing the sort of
atrocities perpetrated by European Christians upon them was quickly overlooked. Give us our land, said the Zionists, and
we will take care of the rest.
So now, we are confronted with the situation where there is not a Muslim on the face of the earth that does not see
Israel’s occupation of the Holy Land as an unjustified invasion of their land. The only difference between this and the
initial colonization of the United States of America, is that, unlike what happened to the American Indians, Caucasians,
whether Christian or Jewish, have not been able to eradicate sufficient numbers of indigenous people to take over the
land without opposition. The Muslims have not acceded to the colonial expansion of the “settlers” in Israel, to the U.S.
demand for expansion of the militarist Israeli state, or to the eradication of those who inhabited the land before the
Jews arrived.
In virtually every temple and Jewish Community Center in the United States, Israel is seen as “the good guy” in the
Middle East, and the Arabs are seen as devils. The impact this has had on Jews in the United States is to divide the
community into two totally distinct communities: those who are Zionists and those who identify with being Jewish, but
reject the racism and violence perpetrated by Israel against the entire Muslim world. It is impossible for Jews who take
pride in their heritage, to participate in their own communities without endorsing the atrocities perpetrated by Israel
against Arabs throughout the world. Jews who reject Zionism are outcasts in the established Jewish communities. They
have no base and no community. We are either anti-Muslim or invisible. We are left with no alternatives within the
broader community.
The U.S. is perfectly content to let Israel serve as the buffer between hostile Arab nations and U.S. imperialism. After
all, it is the Jews who are fighting Muslims on a daily basis, not Americans. But once the State of Israel is defeated
because of its bellicose intransigence and intolerance to those with whom they should be sharing the land, Jews
everywhere will suffer the consequences and be at risk. One could not write a more ironical conclusion. Non-Zionist Jews
are like the non-existent Left in the United States – we are simply not included in the debates of our nation or among
our people; and, because Zionists permit no rational debates or discussions, they are without a clue as to the
international implications of their cruelty toward the Palestinian peoples. The world will not put up with this
indefinitely. It is just a matter of time.
*************
Luke Hiken is an attorney who has engaged in the practice of criminal, military, immigration, and appellate law.