Trajectory of Middle East Conflict

Trajectory of Middle East Conflict

By Dan Lieberman

October 19, 2011

Israelis and Palestinians placed themselves in no-win situations, proceeded to lose-lose situations, and remain in an intense conflict. Institutions and agencies who gather data and predict trends must know that the conflict's monotonic trajectory of violence forecasts disaster and its citizens will suffer greatly from the fallout in which Israelis and Palestinians have trapped one another. Yet, policies don't seem to consider the ominous signs - just the opposite - the rhetoric pardons, the direction plods, and illegal actions draw only mild rebuke.

The more publicized reports shape the Israeli/Palestinian conflict as an embattled Israel that struggles for security by repelling attacks from antagonists. By removing ourselves from the cinematic Exodus perspective, another dimension to the struggles is revealed; the world misperceived each crisis, which allowed Israel to extend its territory and guide the Middle East conflict in its own direction. Recognition of the other dimension is a preliminary step to calculating the trajectory of the Israeli/Palestinian crisis.

A brief summary, from another perspective, of the wars fought by Israelis presented below. A more detailed report can be read at Israel's Wars.

In the 1948 war, the Arab forces did not have the military strength to “throw the Israelis into the sea.” Egyptian troop movements indicate a defense of the new Palestinian state rather than intent to occupy the new Israeli state.

It is no coincidence that Israel invaded and occupied the Sinai in 1956 before French and British coordinated attacks against Nasser's Egypt. Rarely mentioned is a controversial meeting, known as the Protocol of Sèvres, which describes Israel Prime Minister David ben Gurion's proposed invasion plan to Great Britain and France.

At the start of the 1967 war, Israel claimed that Arab armies had prepared an attack, which forced Israel to defend itself. The media didn't accurately portray the hostilities that preceded the battle. Israel reacted to events with its own provocative behavior and initiated the offensive that started the six-day war.

The first Lebanon war (1982-1985) commenced from Israel's assertion that the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) had violated a ceasefire agreement. President Johnson's UN ambassador George Ball contradicted Israel and stated that the PLO had observed the ceasefire agreement. He also wrote in his memoirs, "Israel continued looking for the internationally recognized provocation that Secretary of State Alexander Haig said would be necessary to obtain American support for an Israeli invasion of Lebanon."

The second Intifada (2000-2004) and its suicide bombings erupted from Israel's aggressive tactics. Statistics from Israel Human rights organization, B'Tselem, show that from the date of Ariel Sharon's unnecessary excursion on the Temple Mount/Haram al Sharif in September 29, 2000 until the beginning of the year 2001 Israeli forces killed 237 Palestinian civilians in the occupied territories. More than 100 Palestinian civilians, of which about 1/2 were minors under 18 years of age, had already been killed before two terrorist bombings killed four civilians in Israel.

In December 2006, by killing several Israeli soldiers and abducting two of them, while firing mortars at the Israel town of Shlomi, Hezbollah started an unjustified skirmish. Israel, after learning it could not use a ground campaign to retrieve its military personnel, escalated hostilities that could have and should have been contained, initiated a pulverizing war. Hezbollah started a low-level conflict and Israel propelled the skirmish into a violent war with the intent of rousing the Lebanese against Hezbollah and destroying the Shiite militia.

Operation "Cast Lead" (December 2008 to January 2009) ostensibly resulted from Israel's attempt to silence rocket fire from Gaza. Ignored were Israel's punishing tactics against the Gazans, which provoked the rocket attacks, and that, in the three months preceding the invasion, the rockets did no damage. "Cast Lead' managed to kill many Palestinians and destroy Gaza infrastructure but did not end hostilities between Israel and the rocket firers. Since Israel did not satisfy its stated objective for its attack, which was to "stop the rocket firing," other reasons and objectives prevail. One objective - to test new invasion strategies and weapons for future wars.

Since the world allowed one-sided and horrific wars, Israel has an incentive to continue its drive towards a Greater Israel. After suffering casualties during the Second Lebanon War, and in order to prevent damage to its citizens in the coming wars, Israel modified military strategy and exposed its intentions. All rockets fired from Gaza now serve to test the new Iron Dome anti-ballistic missile weapon system. Robotic armaments (Israel eyes futuristic robot army August 29, 2011, Ryan Jones, Israel Today Magazine) are being designed to replace the warring foot soldiers.

Israel has de facto control of the West Bank. Its next step is to achieve de jure recognition. Once that occurs, the new Israel emerges with a likelihood of giving attention to only citizens of the Jewish faith, adding another flame to a burning situation.

Evidence - The discrimination against Israeli Arabs has existed for decades and no positive changes are being offered. The status of Israel's Palestinian citizens compares to that of the African Americans in the United States in the years before 1950. While being almost 20% of the population, only 13 of the 120 members of the Israeli Parliament are Arab citizens, and they are powerless. At the end of 2010, 7.5% % Israeli civil servants were Arab with mostly serving Arab communities. Laws that discriminate against Palestinian citizens of Israel are summarized in War in Context - Discrimination against Palestinian citizens of Israel.

The future continues the past.

No strong Israeli movement protests the exclusions of Israeli Palestinians from society. This attitude permits future Israeli governments to accelerate a downward drift in rights for the Palestinian Israelis. As both ethnic populations grow and seek more space, the room for the Palestinians, who cannot purchase land or move to new communities, will shrink. Noting the escalating ethnocentric and virulent nationalism of the Jewish Israelis, the future of the Israeli Arabs is that of benign neglect and pressure to move away, with < a href=http://english.aljazeera.net/palestinepapers/2011/01/2011124105622779946.html> some talk of expulsion. That trajectory has started,

JERUSALEM (Reuters) Oct. 5, 2011 -- "Following a recent increase in 'Price tag' attacks on Palestinian holy sites, former high-ranking Israeli security officials warned of the risk of a surge in violence across the region. The attack this week on a mosque in the village of Tuba-Zangariya in northern Israel, where the interior prayer hall and religious emblems were set on fire, was the most recent in a series of attacks that Jewish settlers label 'Price Tag' attacks, signifying payback for any Israeli curbs on settlements in the West Bank. By spreading a year long trail of torched mosques and vehicles from occupied territory into Israel, the elusive militants now threaten not only peacemaking with Palestinians but an already strained coexistence between Israel's Jewish and minority Palestinian citizens."

The trajectory is worse for the Palestinians living in the West Bank. With no rights, no economic stability, no relief from movement restrictions, and continuous harassment and encroachment by Israeli settlers, these Palestinians awake on a reservation, and have two choices - bear it or leave it. Settler-related incidents resulting in Palestinian injuries and damage to property are up more than 50 percent this year, according to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, which documents violence in the Palestinian territories.

With Egypt moving away from Mubarak’s policy of catering to Israel, and the Muslim Brotherhoods entering governments of Egypt, Libya and Tunisia, the Gazans will finally have a window into the world and companions in their struggle. Hamas, an offshoot of the Brotherhood, and Hezbollah, who shares the fundamentalist Islam attitude towards Israel, will be more emboldened. If the present windowless and helpless Gazans receive constant attacks from Israel, what will their hopeful and renewed energy bring from their powerful neighbor?

Jerusalem's political fate brings the conflict into a new arena. Muslim anxiety over East Jerusalem and Haram al-Sharif destinies will bring Iran and other Muslim nations to react aggressively at Israeli moves to modify Wafq control of its Holy Sites. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu already announced in 2010 that two Jewish holy sites in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, Hebron's Ibrahimi Mosque and Bethlehem's Rachel's Tomb, none of which contain proven remains of Abraham or Rachel, and both revered by Muslims, are to be Israeli national monuments. The moves to rewrite history and redefine religious sites are certain to bring violent reactions from the Muslim world, who will view these actions as additional steps to degrade Islam and limit its authority.

Put it all together and we have an alignment of forces that completely, except for Jordan for the time being, surround Israel and contain aggressive militants, willing to fight vociferously for Arab and Muslim causes. These forces will have more access to heavy weapons, no unified command, fewer restrictions and less control of their actions. Random attacks on Israel over a wide front will escalate. Punishing revengeful attacks by Israel will occur. Similarly to how Israel augmented its disputes with the PLO and Hezbollah to include Lebanon and its dispute with some rocket firers to include all of Gaza, the IDF will include in their bomb sights Arab nations that contain antagonists. There will be mounting death totals, infrastructure destruction, and no end to the hostilities.

If Israel finds itself in a losing situation, it will assuredly turn to the nuclear option. Iran and Egypt's large territories can be blasted without radioactivity escaping to neighboring nations. Not so with Israel. The tiny nation borders with Arab nations, and a nuclear strike on Israel will affect the bordering nations. But who knows? In a berserk world anything can happen.

PRETORIA, South Africa (AFP) Oct. 5, 2011-- "I right now see Israel as a threat for its region, because it has the atomic bomb," Erdogan said in a foreign policy speech during an official visit to South Africa. He also accused Israel of committing "state terrorism."

Aftenposten, Norway’s largest newspaper, reported it has all 250,000 secret US diplomatic cables that were obtained by WikiLeaks. One cable from the US Embassy in Tel Aviv to the State Department in Washington recounts a meeting between the visiting American congressional delegation headed by former Democratic Representative Ike Skelton, (the head of the House Armed Services Committee, who was defeated for re-election last November) and Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi, the Israeli chief of staff, which took place on November 15, 2009.

"The Israeli military preparations for a new war in the Middle East are in full swing. General Ashkenazi is quoted in the November 2009 cable as saying that the Israeli military is preparing to wage the next war 'in the same areas where the previous wars took place, namely in Lebanon and the Gaza Strip.' He told the visiting members of the US Congress: 'I’m preparing the Israeli army for a major war since it is easier to scale down to a smaller operation than to do the opposite.”’

If the previous arguments are insufficient to predict havoc, other arguments over water rights will fuel a conflagration.

Ilan Berman and Paul Michael Wihbey, The New Water Politics of the Middle East, Strategic Review, Summer 1999.

According to the Lebanese Water Ministry, 30-40 percent of the River Dan’s water flows into it through underground supplies originating in the Shebaa. “Israel is worried that if Lebanon gains control of the Shebaa, it can then control the flow to the Dan River."

Can there be any doubt that an ongoing and huge Middle East conflict will spill over into the western world?

As Radical Islam grows and flexes its muscles, those who sense that western assistance to Israel has handicapped their battle will react aggressively. Expansions of the scope, boldness, numbers, weapons, destruction, and audacity of present terrorism are probable. New weapons that kill, without danger of a retaliatory kill, are being made available to all. As one example, drones of all sizes are becoming widely produced and prominently marketed at air shows. Iran, an often mentioned future combatant, has an unmanned aerial vehicle that is capable of carrying out bombing missions against ground targets and flying long distances at a high speed.

The final blow hits the western world in its most sensitive feature - the gushing oil that lubricates its economy. Sabotaging oil fields and restricting exports will affect world economies and intensify western involvement in the conflict.

This is the trajectory of the Middle East conflict, and probably, but not necessarily the outcome. Probably, because once the U.S. or Israel contemplate or face war, the battle occurs with no consideration of compromise and with terrible ferocity. Note Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and Israel's constant wars; all combats with no decided outcome except to proceed to the next war. If the present perspective of the conflict changes from: "Will the peace process be harmed if Israel increases its settlements?" to "Can we permit destruction of vast areas of the world because Israel continually increases settlements and control of the West Bank?" then the seriousness will move the world to more accurately evaluate situations and provide direction towards preventing the catastrophe. Just ask some questions.

• Who talks from history and archaeology and who talks from unverified Biblical stories?

• Who has legal right to the land and who bases claims on an incomprehensible "given by God, to me" story?

• What will happen if Israel is forced to depart from its goal of being an expanded "Jewish state?" How many persons in the world will be disappointed? How much of the world, including Jews who sense they are being co-opted by Israel's maneuvers to include them, will feel relief?

• What will happen if Israel is not forced to depart from its goal of being an expanded "Jewish state?" Won't we have mass killings and destruction between those who favor the "Jewish only state" and those of several Arab nations? Won’t we have massive mass terrorism, and economic collapse of the western world?

• - Why is a relatively small group in a small nation, with designs that come from schemes and spurious dreams, allowed to push the world into catastrophe?

When Jack Nicholson, in the film A Few Good Men, shouted at Tom Cruise, "You can't handle the truth," he might have been speaking to a disillusioned world. He could have added, "and unable to face reality."

*************

Dan Lieberman is the editor of Alternative Insight, a monthly web based newsletter. His website articles have been read in more than 150 nations, while articles written for other websites have either appeared or been linked in online journals throughout the world. Many have served as teaching resources in several universities and several have become Internet classics, each attracting about ten thousand readers annually.