Michael Geist - Wikileaks on New Zealand
Copyright: US Funds IP Enforcement, Offers to Draft
Legislation
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/5769/125/
Saturday
April 30, 2011
This week I published multiple posts Wikileaks cables revelations on the U.S. lobbying pressure on Canadian copyright including attempts to embarrass Canada, joint efforts with lobby groups such as CRIA, and secret information disclosures from PCO to U.S. embassy personnel (posts here, here, here, here, here, and here). Wikileaks has also just posted hundreds of cables from U.S. personnel in New Zealand that reveal much the same story including regular government lobbying, offers to draft New Zealand three-strikes and you're out legislation, and a recommendation to spend over NZ$500,000 to fund a recording industry-backed IP enforcement initiative. Interestingly, the cables regularly recommend against including New Zealand on the Special 301 list, despite the similarities to Canadian copyright law that always garner vocal criticism.
As New Zealand was
working through its own round of copyright reform in 2008,
the U.S. was actively lobbying several cabinet members. A February 2008 cable
notes:
Post has presented the list of noted
shortfalls in the draft legislation to Minister Tizard
(Consumer Affairs), Minister Goff (Trade) and to officials
within the Ministry of Economic Development, the agency
primarily responsible for drafting legislation and
monitoring IP enforcement. Post remains engaged with Bronwyn
Turley, Senior MED Policy Advisor for IP issues to maintain
a dialogue to address the needed technical corrections.
The copyright bill passed in April 2008 and took effect later that year. In a March 2009 cable, the U.S. embassy recommended that New Zealand not be included on the Special 301 list arguing it would be counterproductive. That recommendation is striking when compared to the regular placement of Canada on the list, despite very similar laws…
An earlier cable similarly recommends not including New Zealand on the Special 301 list despite the fact that NZ had not ratified the WIPO Internet treaties (Canada has been placed on the highest list for the same thing). The cable is notable for the objection to a proposed format shifting provision, similar to that found in Bill C-32 and under U.S. fair use…
The U.S. involvement in New Zealand's ISP liability provisions, which included regulations for terminating subscriber access (three strikes) also comes out in the cables…
Finally, an April 2005 cable reveals the U.S. willingness to pay over NZ$500,000 (US$386,000) to fund a recording industry enforcement initiative. The project was backed by the Recording Industry Association of New Zealand (RIANZ) and the Australasian Mechanical Copyright Owners Society (AMCOS). Performance metrics include:
The
project's performance will be judged by specific milestones,
including increases in the number of enforcement operations
and seizures, with percentages or numerical targets re-set
annually. The unit also will be measured by the number of
reports it submits to the International Federation of the
Phonographic Industry (IFPI) on its contributions to IP
protection and enforcement methodology.
The proposed budget included four salaried positions, legal costs for investigation and prosecution, and training programs. The RIANZ still runs an anti-piracy site, but does not include disclosure about the source of funding. It certainly raises the question of whether New Zealand is aware that local enforcement initiatives have been funded by the U.S. government and whether the same thing is occurring in Canada.