by Steve Weissman,
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
In 1964, Sen. Barry Goldwater of Arizona ran for president as a rock-ribbed conservative who yearned to roll back both
the Soviet Empire and FDR's New Deal. He carried only six states with 52 electoral votes, and Lyndon Johnson remained
the commander-in-chief that an entire generation loved to hate. Yet, even after suffering a stunning defeat, the rabidly
anti-New Deal Republicans, ultra-right-wing millionaires, evangelical Christian preachers, John Birchers and other
extreme anti-communists who backed Barry Goldwater went on to build the modern conservative movement that propelled
Ronald Reagan into the White House.
In 2008, one of Goldwater's proteges is running for president with the same kind of backers and a similar agenda
updated to account for the fall of the Soviet Union, the rise of Islamist jihadists, and unbelievable persistence of the
neocons, who are now trying to sell us a new war on Iran.
Short of a major terrorist attack or worse, John McCain seems likely to go down to a humiliating defeat. But, as in the
1960's, today's anti-New Deal Republicans, ultra-right wing billionaires, right-wing evangelical preachers, and neocon
ideologues will not run off with their tails between their legs. They have no shame, not even after the endless
embarrassment of the Bush presidency, Wall Street's worst crisis since the Great Depression, and colonial wars we can
never win in Iraq, Afghanistan and now Pakistan.
The right-wing zealots will, in fact, ratchet up the cliched mantras that led us into most of the current ca-ca. We all
know the routine:
Leave the free market free of government oversight and regulation.
Privatize Social Security and government services.
Pursue free trade with no protection for workers or the environment.
Expand American control of the world's oil and natural gas, both to benefit Big Oil and as a political weapon to control
the behavior of other nations, friend and foe.
Talk of spreading democracy while propping up dictators.
Give the Pentagon a budget every year the size of the hopefully one-time Wall Street bailout.
Leave the military as the heart and soul of our response to militant Islam.
Continually break down our constitutionally-mandated separation between government and militant Christianity.
These imperatives are the holy writ of the radical Republican revolution once preached by Ronald Reagan and now pursued
by John McCain and Sarah Palin. But, sadly, many of the same notions have become the song and dance of prominent
Democrats as well - in the Clinton administration, in Congress, and among a large number of advisers now surrounding
Barack Obama.
How, then, do the rest of us have any chance to make real the hope that Obama has inspired? I wish I had an easy
answer, but reality is far too nuanced.
In terms of policy, the old certainties make no sense. The free market never would have created the Internet.
Government did that, ironically enough, through the Pentagon's Advanced Research Projects Agency. But government never
would have turned the Internet into the liberating force it has become. Independent capitalists and free-lance bloggers
did that, though many on the business side are now trying to restrict the promise of "the freedom monster" they helped
to create.
Government regulation is a similarly mixed bag. Wise regulations could have prevented the crap-shoot capitalism that is
now bringing down the world's financial system. Stupid regulations, by contrast, long preserved monopolistic control of
global telecommunications. In much the same way, balanced budgets sometimes make sense, and other times - like now -
deeper deficits seem a far better way to go.
From passing future appropriations to creating a new regulatory framework, the devil we face will be in the details,
which right-wing zealots and the vested interests they serve have learned to manipulate with earmarks and loopholes.
Progressive public interest groups have also learned to play the game, but we badly need tighter regulation of lobbyists
and the threat of criminal penalties to enforce absolute transparency.
One quick fix is to require regulatory agencies, cabinet departments, Congress and the White House to put onto the
Internet any input from interest groups and industry lobbyists. No more secret confabs, like Vice President Dick
Cheney's early meeting with top energy tycoons.
In terms of our own participation, good citizens of a progressive persuasion can no longer leave governing even to the
best of those we elect. Like the right-wing zealots we oppose, we must pursue a permanent campaign, but free of
knee-jerk ideologies and party-line talking points. When the bad guys do what we think is good, we should praise them.
When the good guys do what we think is bad, we should tell them - all loudly and very much in public. This will keep us
honest and maintain our political integrity - characteristics that count more than cynics expect, as John McCain and
Sarah Palin will soon learn to their chagrin.
Those who practice politics in the footsteps of Lenin, Goebbels or Karl Rove will, no doubt, find all this naive,
undisciplined and even wacky. But what can I tell you? The approach I suggest is more in the spirit of what my
generation of activists called participatory democracy. Now turbo-charged by the Internet, it is the best way I know to
build the kind of free-wheeling progressive movement that will have the punch to keep today's hope alive.
Freedom is contagious. Try it, you'll like it.
*************
A veteran of the Berkeley Free Speech Movement and the New Left monthly Ramparts, Steve Weissman lived for many years in London, working as a magazine writer and television producer. He now lives and works in France.